2016-10-20T18:03:00+00:00

Washington D.C., Oct 20, 2016 / 12:03 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- For decades, there's been concern in many corners of the Church that Catholic music is in crisis. The 1992 book “Why Catholics Can't Sing” outlined a history of modern Catholic Liturgical music and a rapid shift away from traditional chants and hymns in the later part of the 20th Century. Writer Damian Thompson decried “Bad Catholic Music,” such as folk-and-jazz-inspired “worship songs” in a 2015 essay in the British publication the Catholic Herald. Most recently, in a February column for Aleteia, Tommy Tighe raises concerns that some common Catholic hymns are not only musically lacking, but doctrinally questionable. Much of the critique of contemporary liturgical music lies in the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, and how they were carried out. Critics attest that when interpreting the changes of Vatican II, many dioceses and parishes cut out important parts of the Church’s liturgical heritage, displaced the rich history of chant with other forms of music, and substituted suggested sung prayers with hymns resembling popular performance songs. While this may certainly be the case in many places, other musical scholars affirm that it is actually the reforms of Vatican II that not only preserve the rich liturgical history the Roman Catholic Church has used for centuries, but allow that tradition to grow. While they may share many of the same critiques of some popular works and trends in certain kinds of liturgical music, they also say that Mass music is getting better – and that it is getting better because the Church has preserved what is good from centuries past and is also providing avenues for worthwhile contributions from other traditions and the modern day. Rather than detract from the Church’s musical heritage, the Church is now in a place to restore and add to it. “The abundance of music composed over the centuries and still apt for the liturgy is staggering,” Catholic University director of Sacred Music, Leo Nestor, told CNA. “It is a sign of the Holy Spirit's continuing inspiration to artists throughout human history.” In the tradition and with the help of guidelines laid down in the Second Vatican Council, the Church has all it needs for beautiful liturgical music. New music, scholars say, is an important part of this revival of musical traditions the Church has saved.   “The Church admits all worthy art into Her liturgy and the Second Vatican Council makes that clear,”  said Fr. Vincent Ferrer Bagan, OP, Choir Director for the Dominican House of Studies in Washington, D.C. “New compositions have always come into the Church.” But in order to see where liturgical music is going, it's important to understand where it came from.The roots of sacred music Music isn't just an important addition to the liturgy, added as an extension of praise and worship. For much of the Church’s history, music has been an essential part of the liturgy itself. The inclusion goes back to the very earliest days of the Church – to the Last Supper, Nestor said. “We know that Christ and his disciples sang a hymn at the Last Supper,” he told CNA. Singing quickly was “mandated” during many parts of early Church celebrations. Over the centuries, Catholic theology developed to explain why the union of sacred music and text was such an important element of worship that arose from these early traditions. The Roman Catholic Church also continued to intertwine music and prayer into nearly every part of its liturgy. Within the Roman Catholic Church, there are sung elements that change to reflect both daily prayers and readings and set elements of the liturgy that remains steady throughout the year, Nestor said. The parts that change daily are called the “Proper,” and the elements which remain the same are called “the Ordinary.” Yet, within recent decades, some of these elements are rarely heard because their use is highly suggested, but not mandatory. While the parts of the Mass Ordinary, such as the Kyrie, Sanctus or Agnus Dei, remain largely constant and cannot be omitted from the Liturgy except under specific circumstances, many parts of the proper have fallen from daily use.  When these elements from the propers are dropped, parishes leave out important music that has special relevance to the prayers of the day. And these propers are “the words the Church wants us to hear sung today,” Nestor said. “The specificity and messages of these texts and their accompanying psalms is mirrored in every other proper text of the liturgy.” While many parishes neglected the propers after the reforms of Vatican II, many churches are starting to bring them back into popular use. “In our day, the propers, specifically the Entrance and Communion Antiphons, are making a very strong return, not only in the major churches, but in many parishes.”Evolving Traditions While the Church proscribes that some parts of the liturgy should be sung when possible, how a congregation places these parts to music can vary by a parish's cultural and its own liturgical traditions. “The Church in her rites accommodates the languages and select elements specific to individual cultures, a custom extending back to the early Church,” Nestor said. The practice of incorporating appropriate cultural elements into the liturgy, also called “inculturation,” is “a two-way street,” he said. In the process, authentic cultural values and traditions are integrated into Christianity and Christianity impacts culture. Authentic accommodation of culture and tradition must respect the essential unity of the liturgy, and the balance between culture and liturgy must be done carefully Nestor cautioned. When this respect for both liturgy and culture takes root, however, it “can be a manifestation of the Church's universality.” Nestor recalled the example of a friend who was active both at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception and at a local African-American parish, St. Augustine's Church, in Washington D.C. Her advice, he said, encapsulated the Church's guidance on the integration and respect for various cultural traditions. “In her maternal wisdom, she said, 'I want my son to be comfortable at St. Augustine's, here at the Shrine, at Notre Dame in Paris and at St. Peter's in Rome,'” Nestor relayed. This attitude, he said, strikes at the heart of the universality of the Church. Various cultures and peoples are no the only ones with their distinct traditions within the Church; many religious orders also have their own liturgical and musical traditions. Fr. Bagan directs the choir at the Dominican House of Studies in Washington, D.C., where student brothers prepare for religious vocations with the Dominican order. He told CNA that in the brothers' latest musical album seeks to illuminate the unique musical tradition of their religious order.   When the Dominican order was founded and its liturgy formed, there was no standard liturgy for the whole Church, Fr. Bagan explained. When the order organized its own liturgy, the Dominicans began their own independent liturgical tradition that is “slightly different” from the Mass and liturgy prayed in the rest of the Roman Catholic Church. From this quirk of liturgical history, Dominican chant also evolved into its own distinct tradition. Like the relationship between the Roman rite and the Dominican rite of the liturgy, the Dominican chants for Mass parts and prayers are only “slightly different” from other chants used within the Roman Catholic Church, like Gregorian chant, even though they developed separately. While the Dominicans now use of the Roman Rite for the ordinary celebration of the Mass and Liturgy of the Hours after the Second Vatican Council, the order still maintains the right to celebrate its own rite and incorporate elements of its own tradition  – such as some of its unique chants and propers –  into its celebrations. “The Church, I think, was happy to say, 'Yes, Dominicans, you have these traditions and they are beautiful. Yes, let’s keep them alive,'” Fr. Bagan said. The brothers' projects, like its album, are opportunities for the Dominicans to share both the richness of the tradition as well as the message of the Gospel with others, said Fr. Bagan. “In the end, we’re really happy to be able to do this because it’s very important to get all of these treasures from the Church’s musical tradition into people’s hands.”Moving Music Forward While eight hundred years old, the Dominican musical tradition is still an evolving one. This fact is an element which the student brothers recording tried to bring forward through new compositions on the album, Fr. Bagan said. Among the older works are new pieces written by brothers, which range in style. Among the new works are more traditional hymn-like settings as well as pieces that include “wilder” harmonies and musical tension and other elements from 20th century music. In his view, Fr. Bagan says that modern liturgical pieces, such as the ones the brothers sing, “take what’s best in the music in our own time and what can be made fitting for the Temple of God and Divine Worship.” “Generally of course, music for Church needs to be a bit more stylistically timeless than music for the secular sphere,” he stipulated, “not to say that good things can’t be brought in.” In addition, he clarified, music intended for the liturgy should remain focused on its purpose and role. “They can be challenging of course, but should never be jarring or distract from the meaning of the divine text or from the purpose of worship for which music is made.” Chris Mueller, a contemporary Catholic composer, also seeks to incorporate modern musical elements into appropriate liturgical settings. Mueller, who has a background in jazz music, has written numerous liturgical pieces, including his “Missa pro editione tertia,” a setting of the 2011 English translation of the Mass, which has been used by parishes around the world. In writing his Mass for the 2011 translation, his goal was to create a piece that was singable and was clearly liturgical, and yet was in conversation with he current state of the musical world.   “I was trying to write in a way that was modern and contemporary, but also liturgically appropriate,” Mueller reflected. While he's “not trying to write music that sounds like Mozart or Bach, I'm trying to write music that sounds modern,” he also doesn't want his music to sound just like secular jazz or modern music played in concert halls or jazz clubs. Finding the “balance” between modern elements and liturgical music, Mueller said, is “an interesting challenge.” The key in writing the “Missa pro editione tertia” and other liturgical pieces has been using modern elements and tones as “part of my palette of approaches,” he commented. For Mueller, drawing on jazz music for inspiration means using “surprising” turns and harmonies that don’t “really sound like anything else” It’s important, Mueller said, for Mass music to sound different from other kinds of music we may hear. “What happens at the Mass when God becomes present at the altar is not something that happens in any part of the rest of your life. The truth of what’s happening at Mass is so different than everything else that the music needs to be reflect that somehow.” For Mueller, creating these works is ultimately about giving his gifts back to God. “In Vatican II it says that sacred music is the most valuable treasure of all the artistic treasures the Church has, then if I can be a small part of that, then what better use of my skills could there be?” But as Church music moves forward in the third millennium, how does all of this translate for the average parish? For Thomas Stehle, how to choose good liturgical music is not only a theoretical issue but a practical one. As director of music for St. Matthew’s Cathedral in Washington D.C, Stehle is in charge of planning liturgies for six English and Latin-language Masses for a diverse community within the Archdiocese. For him, Stehle told CNA, the challenge – as it would be at any parish – is balancing music that is both of quality and liturgically appropriate as well as easily accessible for prayer. He said there's a “legitimate question” not only about a given piece’s quality but also its style. Not every pleasant piece is appropriate for Mass, he cautioned, and this guideline cuts across genres of music. On the other hand, he noted, many pieces that are not considered “high art” are worthy of being sung at Mass. “Does it get beyond, 'oh I love this' to 'I can pray with this?'” Steel said. The approach he's settled on when searching for music is to look for “really legitimate things that come from people's culture, but do it very carefully and as high-quality as possible, within the style,” he said. Stehle also added that music directors should consider both the liturgical season and the Church’s daily readings, propers and prayers in order to create the “highest degree” of unity between liturgy, prayer and music. “It’s important when we’re asking people to embody that prayer in song that it’s coming from very informed choices.” “(T)hat is the goal; that what you put in people’s mouths is worthy, is appropriate, is liturgically appropriate, is pastorally appropriate and is musically appropriate.”  This article was originally published March 4, 2016. Read more

2016-03-04T07:25:00+00:00

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Mar 4, 2016 / 12:25 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The majority of Brazilians are opposed to abortion in cases where the baby exhibits microcephaly, a new survey finds. The poll comes amid continued concerns over the possible role of Zika virus in causing microcephaly. Released by Brazil’s Datafolha Institute, the survey indicates that 58 percent of Brazilians reject the practice of abortion in cases of pregnant women infected with the Zika virus. Just 32 percent think the woman should have an abortion and 10 percent had no opinion. Even in cases where it is confirmed that the baby will be born with microcephaly, 51 percent of respondents were against ending the baby’s life. About 39 percent approved of an abortion. The first case of the Zika virus in the Americas was recorded in Brazil in May 2015. Since then, the virus has spread through half of South America, much of Central America and Mexico. Some cases have been reported in the southern United States. The Zika virus is most often transmitted by a certain species of mosquito. Usually infection does not cause serious illness. However, some reports from Brazil suggest a connection between virus infections and microcephaly in babies developing in the womb. The infection appears to be passed from a pregnant mother to her unborn child. The Centers for Disease Control in its Feb. 26 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, has said “laboratory evidence from a limited number of cases with microcephaly” has supported a link between virus infection and microcephaly. Microcephaly is a medical condition in which babies have small heads. Accompanying conditions can range from mild to severe. Severe problems may include seizures, vision or hearing problems, and developmental disabilities, the Centers for Disease Control said.   Abortion advocates have used the virus’ possible connection with microcephaly to push for expanded legal abortion in South and Central America. On Feb. 5, the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner of Human Rights, headed by Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein of Jordan, released a statement urging countries suffering from the epidemic to provide women “quality sexual and reproductive health services and information.” This included “safe abortion services.” Pope Francis, on his return flight from Mexico to the Vatican, rejected this push. He said that abortion is “a crime” since it means “throwing one out to save another.” “That's what the mafia does. It's a crime, an absolute evil,” the Pope said Feb. 18. Several Latin American countries with laws restricting abortion rejected demand for abortion, including Brazil. The Brazilian Secretary of Health, Marcelo Castro, said that the position of his office is “upholding the law.” “Brazilian legislation only allows abortion in three cases, and they don’t include (microcephaly),” he said. Fernando Llorca Castro, Costa Rica’s Secretary of Health, took a similar position. In a statement to the Costa Rican daily La Nación, he explained that the country is considering legal abortion “when the mother is at risk, which is not the case for babies with microcephaly.” He added that “there’s not even any convincing evidence that Zika is causing microcephaly.” Last month, a Brazilian journalist with microcephaly slammed the push for abortion, explaining that some people with the condition – including herself – are able to live normal lives.   Read more

2016-03-04T04:01:00+00:00

Rome, Italy, Mar 3, 2016 / 09:01 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Cardinal George Pell and a dozen survivors of clerical sex abuse met in Rome on Thursday, where they shared an emotional encounter and drafted a joint statement committing to work toward peace and healing. “I just met with about a dozen of the Ballarat survivors, support people and officials and heard each of their stories and of their sufferings. It was hard; an honest and occasionally emotional meeting,” Cardinal Pell, who is prefect of the Vatican's Secretariat for the Economy, said in the March 3 statement. Cardinal Pell read the statement aloud to reporters outside Rome’s Hotel Quirinale, where for the past four days he has been giving his testimony before Australia's Royal Commission investigating institutional responses to child sex abuse cases. He assured his commitment to working with members of the survivors group, many of whose families he knows from his time as a priest in Ballarat, a city in Australia's state of Victoria. “I know the goodness of so many people in Catholic Bellarat; a goodness which is not extinguished by the evil that was done.” It is everyone’s desire to make things better on the ground, he said, and promised his personal commitment in helping the survivors to work effectively with the various agencies in Rome dedicated to fighting clerical sexual abuse, particularly the recently-established Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors. At the hearing the cardinal testified on claims which resurfaced last year accusing him of transferring notorious abuser Gerald Ridsdale; of attempting to bribe David Ridsdale, a victim and nephew of the later-defrocked priest; and of failing to act on victims’ complaints. Despite having testified before the commission twice before on the same charges, Pell offered to testify again and was summoned to return to Australia for deposition in December. However, the cardinal’s doctor advised against the long flight due to health issues. As a result, Cardinal Pell volunteered to appear by way of video conference from Rome, which took place Feb. 28 – March 3. David Ridsdale was present in Rome for the cardinal’s hearing alongside 14 other abuse survivors from Australia and their families, who launched a crowdfunding campaign in order to raise the money to send them, so that Cardinal Pell would have the same sort of public hearing as he would have in Sydney. Cardinal Pell arranged for the group to meet with Fr. Hans Zollner, SJ, president of the Pontifical Gregorian University’s Center for Child Protection and a member of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, after the hearing finished. After talking to Fr. Zollner, the survivors returned to Hotel Quirinale for their meeting with Cardinal Pell. In comments to the media after the encounter, David Ridsdale described it as “extremely emotional,” but was happy they were able to meet “on a level playing field; we met as people from Bellarat.” Cardinal Pell was ordained a priest of the Diocese of Ballarat in 1966, where many of the abuse survivors in Rome are from and where he served as a priest and later as a consulter to Bishop Ronald Mulkearns, who oversaw the diocese from 1971-1997. Among the many survivors present were Anthony and Chrissie Foster, the parents of two clerical abuse victims. After two of the Fosters’ three daughters were abused by Fr. Kevin O’Donnell, one committed suicide, while the other became an alcoholic and was struck by a car while intoxicated, leaving her severely disabled.      Suicide has been common among victims of clerical sex abuse in Ballarat, and is something both Cardinal Pell and the survivors spoke out against in their statement. “One suicide is too many. There have been many such tragic suicides,” Cardinal Pell said while reading it aloud. He committed to working with the survivor group to try to stop suicides after abuse, and to make it so that “suicide is not seen as an option for those who are suffering.” Despite the vast distance between Rome and Ballarat, the cardinal said he wants to continue contributing to making the city a model and a place of healing and peace. He voiced his support to begin investigating the feasibility of creating a research center dedicated to enhancing the healing of abuse survivors and to improving the protection of youth, and expressed his faith in the loyalty and charity of the church-going community in Ballarat. “I urge them to continue to cooperate with the survivors to improve the situation,” he said, and noted how much he owes on a personal level to the Ballarat community.   “It would be marvelous if our city became well-known as an effective center and the example of practical help for all those wounded by the scourge of sexual abuse,” he said. Read more

2016-03-03T23:30:00+00:00

Cologne, Germany, Mar 3, 2016 / 04:30 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A focus on the reception of Holy Communion by the divorced-and-remarried misses the larger point of pastoral care: participation in the Church's whole life, Cardinal Gerhard Müller said in an interview on Tuesday. “The Pope always says that it is not about Holy Communion alone, but about integration within the life of the Church,” Cardinal Müller, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, told German daily Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger in an interview published March 1. The final step of this process, he said, may be the reception of Holy Communion, “after a process of conversion and repentance, if the generally valid prerequisites for this are fulfilled.” “A second marriage or a second spouse, as long as the rightful spouse is still alive, is not possible according to the Catholic interpretation of the words of Jesus.” “The Pope and all of us however want to carefully avoid people ‘drifting away’ from the Church as community of salvation,” he reflected. There are other forms of participation in the life of the Church that are “valuable and legitimate,” the cardinal noted. “Community with God and the Church is not only constituted in the oral reception of Holy Communion.” In addition to discussing pastoral care of the divorced-and-remarried, the interview touched on Islam, the persecution of Christians in the Middle East, the United States presidential election, clerical sex abuse, and the cardinal's relationship with Pope Francis. Concluding with a discussion of divorce-and-remarriage and the reception of Holy Communion, Cardinal Müller acknowledged that “one may indeed struggle with the best way of handling a difficult situation.” “But what certainly is not possible is putting the teaching of Jesus Christ up for negotiation,” he said. “And that teaching is, after all: 'What God therefore has joined together, let no man separate'. There can be no compromise there, by which we as humans would turn the clear word of God into something vague. A sound pastoral approach is the opposite of relativizing the words of Christ.” The cardinal defended the role of bishops in ensuring clear teaching. He compared this to motor vehicle inspections to ensure cars are roadworthy “so as to avoid accidents with serious consequences.” “If the matter at stake is the salvation of humans and endangering eternal life, then bishops have an even bigger responsibility. And the word of God is in fact very clear. There is but one faith, even if there are legitimately different schools of theology.” The Cologne newspaper asked the cardinal whether his explanation of the teaching on marriage and Holy Communion was a step back from the German bishops’ position at the 2015 Synod on the Family,  characterizing it as finding participation in Communion being conceivable for the divorced-and-remarried after a discussion with a priest in the internal forum. In response Cardinal Müller noted that this is possible only if the divorced-and-remarried take on the duty to live in complete continence. He said this citing St. John Paul II's reminder “regarding the perennially valid teaching of the Church on marriage in his apostolic exhortation Familiaris Consortio.” He added that reception of Holy Communion by the divorced-and-remarried must also take “into consideration the manifold situations upon which the process of reconciliation is predicated.” “The Church is not able to dissolve or suspend a valid and truly sacramental marriage.” One of the German leaders at the center of the remarriage controversy is Cardinal Walter Kasper, president emeritus of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. The Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger noted Cardinal Kasper’s description of a “battle” in the Vatican over the future of the Church. Cardinal Müller responded: “He retracted that problematic metaphor.” “A battle is aimed at destroying the enemy. But this is neither about the subjugation of others nor certainly about enmities. The subject was the teaching on marriage,” he explained. The interviewer cited Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Munich and Freising, who, he said, considers unrealistic the expectation of sexual abstinence in an irregular union. Cardinal Müller commented: “That is also what the apostles thought, when Jesus explained to them the indissolubility of marriage (cf. Matthew 19:10). But what seems to us human beings to be impossible, is made possible by the grace of God.” Read more

2016-03-03T22:35:00+00:00

Phoenix, Ariz., Mar 3, 2016 / 03:35 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- After a heated debate last month, the decision to replace public prayer with a moment of silence at Phoenix City Council meetings has been reversed. Yesterday, the city council voted 7-2 to allo... Read more

2016-03-03T17:13:00+00:00

Rome, Italy, Mar 3, 2016 / 10:13 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Speaking to an Australian committee investigating institutional responses to child sex abuse cases, Cardinal George Pell has expressed his regret for failing to take more action against abusive priests in the 1970s and '80s. One of the things Cardinal Pell has most lamented throughout the process is that he “should have done more” as a priest-advisor to his bishop, and as an auxiliary bishop. He expressed regret “that I didn’t do more at that stage,” adding that “in retrospect I might have been a little more pushy” when issues came up and he didn’t seem to have all the facts. On March 3 Cardinal Pell completed the fourth and final day of his hearing before Australia's Royal Commission, facing a six hour cross-examination by 11 legal counsels, including his own. The other counsels represented victims who had been abused by Catholic priests in both Ballarat and Melbourne in the 1970s and '80s. He was confronted with evidence brought by the commission earlier in the hearing that as a priest in 1974, he had received information from a student at St. Patrick’s College in the Diocese of Ballarat that Br. Edward Dowlan, who taught at the school, was “misbehaving with boys.” The cardinal said that the comment was not confided, but was “casually mentioned,” and that the student never asked him to do anything. Although he went to the school’s chaplain about the incident shortly after, Cardinal Pell never followed up, since the chaplain told him the issue was being looked into and “I believed him.” Cardinal Pell maintained that had “no idea” abuse was being covered up the way it was at the school, and that the accusation he could have stopped hundreds of other abuses had he been more vocal was a “vast overstatement” given the “meager evidence” he received, and which he never withheld. However, “with the experience of 40 years later,” and after learning that Br. Dowlan’s transfer later that year was made to cover up his abuse, Cartinal Pell said he couldn’t dispute his own “comparative inaction,” and confessed that “certainly I would agree that I should have done more.” He said the consciousness of his own personal responsibility and obligations in such situations grew as he continued through his priesthood, becoming an adviser to the Ballarat bishop, then later as both auxiliary bishop and Archbishop of Melbourne. Cardinal Pell is now prefect of the Secretariat for the Economy, which oversees Vatican finances, and is a member of the Council of Cardinals advising Pope Francis on reform of the Roman Curia. March 3 marked his final appearance before Australia's Royal Commission regarding claims accusing the cardinal of moving “known pedophile” Gerald Ridsdale; of bribing David Ridsdale, a victim and nephew of the later-defrocked priest; and of ignoring a victim's complaints. Established in 2013, the commission is dedicated to investigating institutional responses to child sexual abuse. Despite having testified before the commission twice before on the same charges, Cardinal Pell offered to testify again and was summoned to return to Australia for deposition in December. However, the cardinal’s doctor advised against the long flight due to health issues. As a result, Cardinal Pell volunteered to appear by way of video conference from Rome, which took place Feb. 28 – March 3. A group of 15 abuse survivors and their family members traveled from Australia to Rome in order to be present for the hearing. The hearing largely focused on Cardinal Pell’s time as a priest in Ballarat and how the Melbourne archdiocese responded to abuse accusations, including during the time that the cardinal served as its auxiliary bishop. Cardinal Pell was ordained a prest of the Diocese of Ballarat in 1966, later serving as a consulter to Bishop Ronald Mulkearns, who oversaw the diocese from 1971-1997. He was appointed auxiliary bishop for the Archdiocese of Melbourne in 1987, and was named its archbishop in 1996. Cases touched on throughout the four-day hearing were those of Gerald Ridsdale; Fr. Paul David Ryan, who in 2006 was imprisoned for three charges of indecent assault; Fr. Bill Baker; Fr. Peter Searson; and on numerous accusations against members of the Christian Brothers who were teaching in Catholic schools at the time, including Br. Dowlan and Br. Leo Fitzgerald. Pell began the hearing by stressing, “I'm not here to defend the indefensible,” and acknowledging that the Church “has made enormous mistakes and is working to remedy those.” He stressed throughout the hearing that in each case he had acted in accordance with the expectations that came with his responsibilities, and that abuse cases in both Ballarat and Melbourne had been hidden from him by his superiors. On the second day he maintained that though he had been an adviser to Bishop Mulkearns in the 1970s and was aware that Gerald Ridsdale had changed parishes more than was usual, the bishop had not told him the moves were made due to allegations of pedophilia. Pell said the situation was similar as auxiliary bishop in Melbourne, and that while accusations of pedophilia had been made against Fr. Searson to the Catholic Education office in the diocese, neither the office nor Archbishop Little told him the allegations were of that nature when he was briefed. “In both cases for some reason, they were covering up,” the cardinal said March 2, explaining that he was under the impression the accusations were related to other topics. “People did not want the status quo to be disturbed,” he said, suggesting that one reason he was kept in the dark could be “because they would have feared that I would not accept the status quo.” Cardinal Pell said he was “not cut from the same cloth,” and that as a bishop who was known for being outspoken, he would have gone against the expectation to cover up at the time. With hindsight, he expressed regret “that I didn’t do more at that stage,” adding that “in retrospect I might have been a little more pushy” when issues came up and he didn’t seem to have all the facts.      On the last day of the hearing Cardinal Pell denied accusations that he had attempted to bribe David Ridsdale to stay quiet. Ridsdale has alleged that when he phoned Pell, then auxiliary bishop of Melbourne, for help in 1993, Pell attempted to bribe him not to go to the police. Cardinal Pell insisted that compensation never came up in the conversation but that David had confided that he had been abused by his uncle and wanted help from the Church. He maintained that David asked for a “quiet process” within the Church, due to the stress a public investigation would place on his grandmother when she found out about her son Gerald Ridsdale’s crimes. The cardinal said he was “eager to help” David in any way he needed and that the topic of financial difficulties arose, but wasn't discussed at length. Cardinal Pell also said that after that initial phone call, David never called back. He said he made a few calls to David’s house to check on how he was doing, but that the youth never responded. Cardinal Pell’s own lawyer spoke last, pointing out that when he was an auxiliary bishop in Melbourne, he pushed for the resignation of Fr. Peter Searson, about whom the archdiocese had received numerous complaints of abuse and violent behavior.   Cardinal Pell approached Searson with an official letter requesting his resignation, the lawyer said. Searson fought the request in a case that went all the way to Rome. Although Rome initially ruled in favor of Searson, Cardinal Pell said, “I just ignored the Roman decision, and Rome didn't push the point.” He voiced his sorrow for the effect of clerical abuse on victims and their families, many of whom now have difficulty setting foot in either a Church or confessional. “One of the things I regret as a Catholic priest is the damage that these crimes do to the faith of survivors, of the victims, and their friends and family, and generally throughout the society,” he said. Before the hearing began, Cardinal Pell expressed his willingness to meet with the abuse survivors who traveled from Australia to be present at the hearing. He met with them collectively on March 3 after the hearing had concluded, and drafted a joint statement with them condemning clerical abuse and promising to continue assisting the recovery process of victims in both Ballarat and Melbourne. The survivors also requested a meeting with Pope Francis, though there has been no confirmation of a time. Cardinal Pell met with the Pope on Monday, and arranged for him to receive a summary of the contents of each day’s hearing sessions. He is the highest ranking Vatican official to have testified before a legal body on clerical sex abuse. Although the Royal Commission can’t bring any charges against the cardinal, they may give their opinion when presenting their findings to judicial bodies. Read more

2016-03-03T17:13:00+00:00

Rome, Italy, Mar 3, 2016 / 10:13 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Speaking to an Australian committee investigating institutional responses to child sex abuse cases, Cardinal George Pell has expressed his regret for failing to take more action against abusive priests in the 1970s and '80s. One of the things Cardinal Pell has most lamented throughout the process is that he “should have done more” as a priest-advisor to his bishop, and as an auxiliary bishop. He expressed regret “that I didn’t do more at that stage,” adding that “in retrospect I might have been a little more pushy” when issues came up and he didn’t seem to have all the facts. On March 3 Cardinal Pell completed the fourth and final day of his hearing before Australia's Royal Commission, facing a six hour cross-examination by 11 legal counsels, including his own. The other counsels represented victims who had been abused by Catholic priests in both Ballarat and Melbourne in the 1970s and '80s. He was confronted with evidence brought by the commission earlier in the hearing that as a priest in 1974, he had received information from a student at St. Patrick’s College in the Diocese of Ballarat that Br. Edward Dowlan, who taught at the school, was “misbehaving with boys.” The cardinal said that the comment was not confided, but was “casually mentioned,” and that the student never asked him to do anything. Although he went to the school’s chaplain about the incident shortly after, Cardinal Pell never followed up, since the chaplain told him the issue was being looked into and “I believed him.” Cardinal Pell maintained that had “no idea” abuse was being covered up the way it was at the school, and that the accusation he could have stopped hundreds of other abuses had he been more vocal was a “vast overstatement” given the “meager evidence” he received, and which he never withheld. However, “with the experience of 40 years later,” and after learning that Br. Dowlan’s transfer later that year was made to cover up his abuse, Cartinal Pell said he couldn’t dispute his own “comparative inaction,” and confessed that “certainly I would agree that I should have done more.” He said the consciousness of his own personal responsibility and obligations in such situations grew as he continued through his priesthood, becoming an adviser to the Ballarat bishop, then later as both auxiliary bishop and Archbishop of Melbourne. Cardinal Pell is now prefect of the Secretariat for the Economy, which oversees Vatican finances, and is a member of the Council of Cardinals advising Pope Francis on reform of the Roman Curia. March 3 marked his final appearance before Australia's Royal Commission regarding claims accusing the cardinal of moving “known pedophile” Gerald Ridsdale; of bribing David Ridsdale, a victim and nephew of the later-defrocked priest; and of ignoring a victim's complaints. Established in 2013, the commission is dedicated to investigating institutional responses to child sexual abuse. Despite having testified before the commission twice before on the same charges, Cardinal Pell offered to testify again and was summoned to return to Australia for deposition in December. However, the cardinal’s doctor advised against the long flight due to health issues. As a result, Cardinal Pell volunteered to appear by way of video conference from Rome, which took place Feb. 28 – March 3. A group of 15 abuse survivors and their family members traveled from Australia to Rome in order to be present for the hearing. The hearing largely focused on Cardinal Pell’s time as a priest in Ballarat and how the Melbourne archdiocese responded to abuse accusations, including during the time that the cardinal served as its auxiliary bishop. Cardinal Pell was ordained a prest of the Diocese of Ballarat in 1966, later serving as a consulter to Bishop Ronald Mulkearns, who oversaw the diocese from 1971-1997. He was appointed auxiliary bishop for the Archdiocese of Melbourne in 1987, and was named its archbishop in 1996. Cases touched on throughout the four-day hearing were those of Gerald Ridsdale; Fr. Paul David Ryan, who in 2006 was imprisoned for three charges of indecent assault; Fr. Bill Baker; Fr. Peter Searson; and on numerous accusations against members of the Christian Brothers who were teaching in Catholic schools at the time, including Br. Dowlan and Br. Leo Fitzgerald. Pell began the hearing by stressing, “I'm not here to defend the indefensible,” and acknowledging that the Church “has made enormous mistakes and is working to remedy those.” He stressed throughout the hearing that in each case he had acted in accordance with the expectations that came with his responsibilities, and that abuse cases in both Ballarat and Melbourne had been hidden from him by his superiors. On the second day he maintained that though he had been an adviser to Bishop Mulkearns in the 1970s and was aware that Gerald Ridsdale had changed parishes more than was usual, the bishop had not told him the moves were made due to allegations of pedophilia. Pell said the situation was similar as auxiliary bishop in Melbourne, and that while accusations of pedophilia had been made against Fr. Searson to the Catholic Education office in the diocese, neither the office nor Archbishop Little told him the allegations were of that nature when he was briefed. “In both cases for some reason, they were covering up,” the cardinal said March 2, explaining that he was under the impression the accusations were related to other topics. “People did not want the status quo to be disturbed,” he said, suggesting that one reason he was kept in the dark could be “because they would have feared that I would not accept the status quo.” Cardinal Pell said he was “not cut from the same cloth,” and that as a bishop who was known for being outspoken, he would have gone against the expectation to cover up at the time. With hindsight, he expressed regret “that I didn’t do more at that stage,” adding that “in retrospect I might have been a little more pushy” when issues came up and he didn’t seem to have all the facts.      On the last day of the hearing Cardinal Pell denied accusations that he had attempted to bribe David Ridsdale to stay quiet. Ridsdale has alleged that when he phoned Pell, then auxiliary bishop of Melbourne, for help in 1993, Pell attempted to bribe him not to go to the police. Cardinal Pell insisted that compensation never came up in the conversation but that David had confided that he had been abused by his uncle and wanted help from the Church. He maintained that David asked for a “quiet process” within the Church, due to the stress a public investigation would place on his grandmother when she found out about her son Gerald Ridsdale’s crimes. The cardinal said he was “eager to help” David in any way he needed and that the topic of financial difficulties arose, but wasn't discussed at length. Cardinal Pell also said that after that initial phone call, David never called back. He said he made a few calls to David’s house to check on how he was doing, but that the youth never responded. Cardinal Pell’s own lawyer spoke last, pointing out that when he was an auxiliary bishop in Melbourne, he pushed for the resignation of Fr. Peter Searson, about whom the archdiocese had received numerous complaints of abuse and violent behavior.   Cardinal Pell approached Searson with an official letter requesting his resignation, the lawyer said. Searson fought the request in a case that went all the way to Rome. Although Rome initially ruled in favor of Searson, Cardinal Pell said, “I just ignored the Roman decision, and Rome didn't push the point.” He voiced his sorrow for the effect of clerical abuse on victims and their families, many of whom now have difficulty setting foot in either a Church or confessional. “One of the things I regret as a Catholic priest is the damage that these crimes do to the faith of survivors, of the victims, and their friends and family, and generally throughout the society,” he said. Before the hearing began, Cardinal Pell expressed his willingness to meet with the abuse survivors who traveled from Australia to be present at the hearing. He met with them collectively on March 3 after the hearing had concluded, and drafted a joint statement with them condemning clerical abuse and promising to continue assisting the recovery process of victims in both Ballarat and Melbourne. The survivors also requested a meeting with Pope Francis, though there has been no confirmation of a time. Cardinal Pell met with the Pope on Monday, and arranged for him to receive a summary of the contents of each day’s hearing sessions. He is the highest ranking Vatican official to have testified before a legal body on clerical sex abuse. Although the Royal Commission can’t bring any charges against the cardinal, they may give their opinion when presenting their findings to judicial bodies. Read more

2016-03-03T13:43:00+00:00

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Mar 3, 2016 / 06:43 am (CNA).- A 95-year-old priest named Friar Roberto walked more than three-and-a-half miles while hearing confessions during a recent “Penitential Walk” in Brazil. Some 30,000 people participated in the walk, which took place Feb. 28 in the northeast Brazilian Archdioceses of Fortaleza and Salvador de Bahia. “It was one of most beautiful moments I saw today. That example of faith, love and fidelity for the things of God, which is what Friar Roberto showed us today, was a true proof of the presence of God in his heart. We've got to follow his example!” one person commented on social media, sharing pictures of the priest exercising his ministry. (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));Frei Roberto, 95 anos de idade, 71 de padre! Participou neste domingo na arquidiocese de Fortaleza da Caminhada...Posted by Família Católica on Sunday, February 28, 2016 The Capuchin priest was born on September 10, 1920, in the city of Maracanaú (Ceará State). He was baptized with the name Juari Magalhães de Sousa. When he was 14, he entered the Capuchin monastery. He then changed his name to Friar Roberto. He was ordained a priest in 1944 and has been a priest for 71 years. According to Archbishop Gilson Andrade of Salvador de Bahia, one of the dioceses that participated in this initiative, the Penitential Walk “is a gesture that we all make in common as the archdiocese in this time in which the Church remembers that her journey is also marked by our sins, the sins of the faithful.” “We pray together as a Church for others because we need to be freed from our sins with the grace of God and the prayers of our brothers and sisters. At the same time it represents a manifestation of our unity around our pastors,” the archbishop added. More than 200,000 people walked five miles in the “Penitential Walk” of Salvador de Bahia. Many of the participants performed penitential acts such as walking barefoot and carrying small crosses. During the walk in Fortaleza, a cross was carried to recall that Christ carried on his shoulders the weight of all humanity to redeem it. Read more

2016-03-03T10:02:00+00:00

Washington D.C., Mar 3, 2016 / 03:02 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The FDA announced Monday that it will add its strictest warning to the label of Essure, a sterilization device in the form of flexible metal coils inserted into the fallopian tubes. But the decision still comes as a blow to  thousands of “E-sisters” – women who have experienced the often debilitating side effects of the device and who have been pushing to get Essure completely removed from the market. “We are outraged that it appears as if the FDA is going to leave Essure on the market while it implements a draft guidance and labeling recommendations within a black boxed warning as well as ordering new clinical studies,” the group said in a statement on their website. “Clearly Essure's PMA (pre-market approval) should be revoked and the device should be pulled from the market. These studies could take several years, and leaving the device on the market will only put more women's lives at risk.” A so-called “black box” warning has been recommended for the device, which is “designed to call attention to serious or life-threatening risks” of the device including “persistent pain, perforation of the uterus or fallopian tubes from device migration, abnormal bleeding and allergy or hypersensitivity reactions,” according to an FDA statement. Touted as the only form on non-surgical permanent birth control, implanted Essure coils are supposed to stay in the fallopian tubes, where they create a chronic infection causing scar tissue to form, effectively closing the tubes and rendering the woman sterile. The device was first manufactured by the group Conceptus and pre-approved by the FDA before hitting the markets in 2002. In June 2014, Conceptus was bought by Bayer, which has continued to manufacture and distribute Essure. In addition to the “black box” warning, the FDA asked Bayer to include a “patient decision checklist” in Essure's packaging, “to ensure women receive and understand information regarding the benefits and risks of this type of device,” and is accepting the public’s input on the device for 60 days.   The FDA has also ordered Bayer to conduct a three-year clinical study in which they will follow 2,000 women who have been implanted with Essure, and compare them to women who’ve had different sterilization procedures. The FDA expects Bayer to submit a study protocol within 30 days and the company is required by law to begin the study within 15 months, CNN reports. If Bayer does not comply, the FDA can declare the device misbranded. The Facebook page “Essure Problems” is over 27,000 members strong (up from 14,000 just last year) and serves as a place where the “E-sisters” women band together for support and protest the device. They tell their stories to women considering the device and provide the names and locations of doctors who won’t dismiss women’s Essure complaints. “We have provided the FDA with enough relevant data to prove that Essure is unsafe,” the group said in a statement following the FDA’s latest announcement. “Take the device off the market and revoke PMA. Do not continue to allow more women to be harmed. Unless the FDA takes those steps, we intend to push for Congress to force the hand of the FDA.  We will not be stopped or silenced.” Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick, a Republican from Pennsylvania, introduced the “E-free” act to Congress in November, a bill calling for the device to be pulled from the market. He said the latest move from the FDA is unacceptable in the face of all the women who have already suffered because of Essure. “It's unbelievable that it took the FDA since September to make just two recommendations with no enforcement measures and ask the manufacturer to perform another study while leaving Essure on the market,” he said in a statement following the announcement. “It's been done. The evidence is all there: Tens of thousands of injured women and hundreds of fetal deaths.” On the “Essure Problems” Facebook page, women log complaints about chronic pain, allergic reactions, perforated organs, migrating coils, and fetal disfigurement caused by the device. Dr. William Maisel, deputy director for science and chief scientist at the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a news briefing Monday that the agency has received 631 reports of women becoming pregnant while using the product, and 294 reports of pregnancy losses. “Like all forms of birth control, Essure is not perfect and women may become pregnant despite use of the device. The lack of an Essure confirmation test is the most common factor contributing to unintended pregnancies in women with Essure,” Maisel said. The FDA has received about 10,000 complaints of adverse effects since the device’s approval in 2002. Instructions for how to file a complaint about Essure can be found on the Essure Problems website. For 60 days, patients and doctors can submit their feedback to the FDA on the device, which will be taken into consideration before the addition of the new warning labels. Read more

2016-03-03T07:52:00+00:00

Pittsburgh, Pa., Mar 3, 2016 / 12:52 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The Bishop of Altoona-Johnstown is calling for prayers after a Pennsylvania grand jury released its report on the alleged sexual abuse of hundreds of children by priests in the diocese in past d... Read more




Browse Our Archives