2015-01-26T20:10:00+00:00

Washington D.C., Jan 26, 2015 / 01:10 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Both Roman and Orthodox Catholic bishops were stirred by the presence of the Millennial generation at the 2015 March for Life. “You look out in the crowd and you see so many young peop... Read more

2015-01-26T18:33:00+00:00

Vatican City, Jan 26, 2015 / 11:33 am (CNA/EWTN News).- In a speech delivered on Saturday to participants in a conference on how to handle causes of nullity, Pope Francis encouraged a marriage process that is both sure of its judgements and prompt. The three-day conference is sponsored by the Pontifical Gregorian University, and marks the 10th anniversary of Dignitas connubii, an instruction of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts to tribunals on handling causes of the nullity of marriage. Pope Francis praised the document in his Jan. 24 address as “a modest but useful handbook that really takes the ministers of the tribunals by the hand toward the implementation of a process that is both secure and prompt.” “A secure process because it indicates and explains with clarity the goal of the process itself, namely moral certainty: this requires that any prudent, positive doubt of error be totally excluded, even if the mere possibility of the contrary is not excluded. A prompt process because – as common experience teaches – he who knows the path to follow travels more quickly.” The Pope greeted all those who came to the congress from across the world, calling their presence “a great consolation” because “it seems to me a generous response to the stresses that every authentic minister of the tribunals of the Church feels for the good of souls.” “The knowledge and, I would say, the use” of Dignitas connubii, Pope Francis stated, “can, even in the future, help ministers of tribunals to shorten case proceedings, often perceived by spouses as long and wearisome.”   “Up until now, not all of the resources that this instruction makes available for a prompt process, devoid of every formalism for its own sake, have been explored; nor can we exclude further legislative acts in the future aimed at the same end.” He made reference to the defender of the bond, a position appointed in each diocese in marriage cases who, according to canon law, “is bound by office to propose and explain everything which reasonably can be brought forth against nullity or dissolution.” Pope Francis said the role of the defender of the bond is a “proper and original” one in the marriage process, adding that “his presence and the faithful fulfillment of his task do not condition the judge, but allow and encourage the impartiality of his judgment, having set before him the arguments in favor of and contrary to the declaration of nullity of marriage." Read more

2015-01-26T02:02:00+00:00

Vatican City, Jan 25, 2015 / 07:02 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Pope Francis on Jan. 24 stressed the need for dialogue between different faiths, saying that it is essential in preventing violence and promoting peace. “Perhaps now more than ever such a... Read more

2015-01-25T22:37:00+00:00

Vatican City, Jan 25, 2015 / 03:37 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- More than “theoretical discussions,” what unites Christians is encounter, and a willingness to “challenge one another,” said Pope Francis as he marked the conclusion of the... Read more

2015-01-25T21:59:00+00:00

Denver, Colo., Jan 25, 2015 / 02:59 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Lynn Grandon kept a tally on her desk of how many babies she knew the Denver Lighthouse women’s center had helped bring into this world. Last week, an e-mail from a nurse at the center c... Read more

2015-01-25T19:35:00+00:00

Vatican City, Jan 25, 2015 / 12:35 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- During his weekly Angelus address, Pope Francis decried the recent escalation of violence in Ukraine, and later called on Christians to pray for unity with one another. “With deep concern... Read more

2015-01-25T13:30:00+00:00

Washington D.C., Jan 25, 2015 / 06:30 am (CNA).- Pro-life Democrat politicians are fast becoming an endangered political species, but their pro-life presence is necessary for the movement to succeed, both Republicans and Democrats agreed. “I t... Read more

2015-01-25T02:51:00+00:00

Washington D.C., Jan 24, 2015 / 07:51 pm (CNA).- On the 41st anniversary of the legalization of abortion in the U.S., the House passed a ban on federal funding of abortion, after delaying a vote on a different piece of pro-life legislation. Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston, head of the U.S. bishops’ pro-life committee, praised the vote, stating on Friday that “the House has taken a decisive step toward respect for unborn human life, reflecting the will of the American people.” Although President Obama promised that no taxpayer dollars would fund abortion coverage under the Affordable Care Act, the Government Accountability Office reported in September that some abortion coverage in some health plans was not billed separately by the insurance issuers, as required by the law. Thus, both unknowing consumers and federal subsidies were paying for abortion coverage. The president had made his promise through an executive order, to quell concerns of a group of congressmen who opposed the bill because of abortion funding. The Affordable Care Act passed with their subsequent support. In addition, many consumers found it difficult or even impossible to ascertain whether or not their health plan on the state insurance exchanges covered abortion. The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act solidifies Hyde Amendment restrictions already in place and prohibits any “funds authorized or appropriated by Federal law” from paying for abortion or abortion coverage. In addition, no federal health facilities or medical employees may perform abortions. The House passed the bill on Thursday by a vote of 242-179, largely along party lines. Only one Republican opposed the bill – Rep. Richard Hanna (N.Y.). Three Democrats supported it – Rep. Dan Lipinski (Ill.), Rep. Henry Cuellar (Tex.), and Rep. Collin Peterson (Minn.). The bill also mandates disclosure of the extent to which each plan under the Affordable Care Act includes abortion coverage. “This lets Americans choose health coverage that reflects their values,” Cardinal O’Malley said of the law. “Just as most Americans do not want their tax dollars used for abortion, they do not want their own health coverage misused to pay for abortions.” Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) who sponsored the bill said it “will help save lives.” President Obama asserted his strong commitment to legal abortion on Thursday and launched a deep criticism of the law. “I believe that efforts like H.R. 7, the bill the House considered today, would intrude on women's reproductive freedom and access to health care and unnecessarily restrict the private insurance choices that consumers have today,” he said. “The federal government should not be injecting itself into decisions best made between women, their families, and their doctors.  I am also deeply committed to continuing our work to reduce unintended pregnancies, support maternal and child health, promote adoptions, and minimize the need for abortion.” The House had scrambled to vote on the bill after having previously planned a vote on another pro-life bill, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. That bill would ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy except in cases of rape, incest, or threat to the life of the mother. That plan was scuttled at the last minute due to opposition led by Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.) and Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-Ind.). The two congresswomen took issue with language in the rape exemption clause, saying it should be reworked before voting. Pro-life leaders expressed their disappointment at the House leadership pulling the vote but applauded the passage of the No Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Act.   Read more

2015-01-24T23:20:00+00:00

Vatican City, Jan 24, 2015 / 04:20 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Pope Francis was surprised that his words on responsible parenthood were not widely taken in the sense that he intended them, a Vatican official related in an interview on Thursday. Archbishop Giovanni Becciu, Substitute at the Secretariat of State, also told Avvenire, the Italian bishops' publication, on Jan. 22 that the Pope was saddened at the misunderstanding. “The Pope is truly sorry that it created such disorientation. He absolutely did not want to disregard the beauty and the value of large families,” Archbishop Becciu stated. “Seeing the headlines, the Holy Father, with whom I spoke yesterday, smiled and was a bit surprised that his words were not fully contextualized with regards to a very clear passage of Humanae vitae on responsible parenthood,” Archbishop Becciu stated. Bl. Paul VI's 1968 encyclical on the regulation of birth said that “responsible parenthood, as we use the term here, has one further essential aspect of paramount importance. It concerns the objective moral order which was established by God, and of which a right conscience is the true interpreter. In a word, the exercise of responsible parenthood requires that husband and wife, keeping a right order of priorities, recognize their own duties toward God, themselves, their families and human society.” In the in-flight press conference back from Manila Jan. 19, Pope Francis said, “some think that -- excuse the language -- that in order to be good Catholics, we have to be like rabbits,” an stressed that it was instead important to exercise “responsible parenthood.” Archbishop Becciu said the Pope's statement “must be interpreted in the sense that the procreative act of humans cannot follow the logic of the animal instict, but it is instead the fruit of a responsible act that is rooted in love and in the mutual gift of the self.” He then lamented that “unfortunately, very often the contemporary culture tends to diminish the authentic beauty and high value of conjugal love, with all the negative consequences that follow.” During the press conference, Pope Francis had also said he is saddened when people say three children per family is too much, citing that three children per couple “is the number experts say is important to keep the population going.” Many interpreted this as a proclamation as a normative number of children for each Christian couple, but Archbishop Becciu dismissed this interpretation. “The number three only refers to the minimum number that would assure the stability of population, as indicated by sociologists and demographers. In no way did the Pope want to say that it represented the 'just’'number of children for each married couple,” Archbishop Becciu said. He then explained that “every Christian couple, in light of grace, is called to discern according to a variety of divine and human parameters the number of children they should have.” The archbishop said the correct interpretation of Pope Francis' words comes from the teaching of Bl. Paul VI and from the ancient tradition of the Church, which Pius XI’s 1930 encyclical Casti connubii reiterated: that “even if the unitive and procreative aspects of the sexual act must never be separated,” the act “must always be included in the logic of love” with regard to the “capacity of each person to open to the mystery of the gift of self in the bonds of marriage.” Read more

2015-01-24T21:46:00+00:00

Vatican City, Jan 24, 2015 / 02:46 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Pope Francis told a group of religious men and women that they are the forerunners in working towards Christian unity, which is something that first requires personal conversion, holiness and pray... Read more



TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was forbidden after the conquest of Jericho?

Select your answer to see how you score.


Browse Our Archives