2014-12-10T17:44:00+00:00

Vatican City, Dec 10, 2014 / 10:44 am (CNA/EWTN News).- In a message to an international gathering on the impact of nuclear weapons, Pope Francis called on victims to be “prophetic voices” against the potential for destruction of persons and the planet. These victims, he said, “warn us not to commit the same irreparable mistakes which have devastated populations and creation.” The Pope's letter was addressed to Sebastian Kurz, Austrian foreign minister and leader of a two-day conference on the “Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons.” Among those present at the gathering were victims – known as the Hibakusha – of the atomic bombings of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by U.S. forces during World War II. Pope Francis encouraged these and other victims represented at the conference, “to be prophetic voices, calling the human family to a deeper appreciation of beauty, love, cooperation and fraternity, while reminding the world of the risks of nuclear weapons which have the potential to destroy us and civilization.” The conference, held in Vienna from Dec. 8-9, was attended by high-ranking officials from 158 countries and civil society organizations. In his message, dated Dec. 7, Pope Francis cited nuclear weapons as a “global problem,” impacting “future generations” as well as the planet. “A global ethic is needed if we are to reduce the nuclear threat and work towards nuclear disarmament,” he said. People need to be encouraged “to work together for a more secure world, and a future that is increasingly rooted in moral values and responsibility on a global scale.” In addition to recognize their “potential for mass-killing,” the Holy Father called for greater attention to the “unnecessary suffering” which results from the use of nuclear weapons. “Nuclear deterrence and the threat of mutually assured destruction,” he said, “cannot be the basis for an ethics of fraternity and peaceful coexistence among peoples and states.” Young people, now and in the future, “deserve a peaceful world order based on the unity of the human family, grounded on respect, cooperation, solidarity and compassion.” The Holy Father stressed that “the logic of fear” must be countered with “the ethic of responsibility,” thereby fostering “a climate of trust and sincere dialogue.” Pope Francis condemned squandering “the wealth of nations” on nuclear weapons, stressing that  spending should instead be directed toward “integral human development, education, health and the fight against extreme poverty.” “When these resources are squandered, the poor and the weak living on the margins of society pay the price,” he said. “The desire for peace, security and stability is one of the deepest longings of the human heart,” he said, “rooted in the Creator who makes all people members of the one human family.”  Neither military means alone, nor “the possession of nuclear weapons” can satisfy this desire. Rather, “peace must be built on justice, socio-economic development, freedom, respect for fundamental human rights, the participation of all in public affairs and the building of trust between peoples.” Pope Francis encourage participants in the conference toward “sincere and open dialogue between parties internal to each nuclear state, between various nuclear states, and between nuclear states and non-nuclear states.” “This dialogue must be inclusive, involving international organizations, religious communities and civil society, and oriented towards the common good and not the protection of vested interests.” “I am convinced that the desire for peace and fraternity planted deep in the human heart will bear fruit in concrete ways to ensure that nuclear weapons are banned once and for all, to the benefit of our common home,” he added. “The security of our own future depends on guaranteeing the peaceful security of others, for if peace, security and stability are not established globally, they will not be enjoyed at all. Pope Francis concluded his message by stressing the individual and collective responsibility to care “for the present and future well-being of our brothers and sisters.” “It is my great hope that this responsibility will inform our efforts in favor of nuclear disarmament, for a world without nuclear weapons is truly possible.” Read more

2014-12-10T15:26:00+00:00

Vatican City, Dec 10, 2014 / 08:26 am (CNA/EWTN News).- In his weekly general audience Pope Francis started a new catechesis on the family, and explained that discussion surrounding the topic in the synod of bishops is rooted in the fundamental truths ... Read more

2014-12-10T11:06:00+00:00

Canberra, Australia, Dec 10, 2014 / 04:06 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The Australian bishops' office for migrants and refugees has termed “unethical” legislation signed into law last week that gives the national government unprecedented powers to deal toughly with asylum seekers. The Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 was narrowly passed in the Australian senate Dec. 5, and then passed the house of representatives by a wide margin. The new legislation allows Australian officials to redefine who is classified as a refugee, and allows them to push any asylum seeker boat back into the sea, leaving it there. According to the new amendments in the act, the government can block an asylum seeker, detain people without charge, or deport them, and these decisions cannot be challenged. Fr. Maurizio Pettena, director of the Australian Catholic Migrant and Refugee Office, accused the Government of “bartering children to secure passage of Amendments to Australia's Immigration Act” and characterized this as a "new all time low for Australian politics.” To gain support for the legislation from crossbenchers, immigration minister Scott Morrison promised to release hundreds of children who are in immigration detention on Christmas Island, located in the Indian Ocean near Indonesia. “Not only is the content of this bill unethical, but equally so is the nature in which it has been conducted by the Immigration Minister,” Fr. Pettena continued. “Children were bartered to secure this deal.” Fr. Pettena said that “when a government lowers its policies to essentially bargaining vulnerable people for political gain, it raises questions about our morality as a people. Having children detained in the first instance was not an acceptable option.” The priest welcomed Morrison’s proposal to release approximately 100 children from Christmas Island before Dec. 25, and the agreement to raise the humanitarian intake – the law means Australia will accommodate an additional 5,000 refugees by 2018, compared to what the current Labor Party government had planned. Under the previous government, led by the Labor Party, 20,000 humanitarian visas were issued annually. The Liberal Party, elected in 2013, had reduced this figure to 13,750. The Liberal Party's new accommodation is thus for 1,250 fewer refugees annually, than were welcomed by Labor. “Many questions about the implementation of this bill remain unanswered,” said Fr. Pettena. Morrison has promised that the more than 25,000 refugees currently living on mainland Australia on bridging visas will be given the right to work and support themselves. Other measures introduced in the bill include the reintroduction of temporary protection visas allowing asylum seekers to work and study. This visa will not provide a pathway to permanency nor allow family reunification, however, meaning asylum seekers’ lives will remain in a state of insecurity and anxiety, the Australian Catholic Migrant and Refugee Office said. The bill also allows the government to detain asylum seekers and classify them as fast track refugee status. Asylum seekers arriving by boat illegally will have no access to the Refugee Review Tribunal, but will be sent to Immigration Assessment Authority and will not get a hearing. “In practise it means that the government will remain unchecked and unchallenged in its decision-making,” the Australian Catholic Migrant and Refugee Office noted. “Under the recently passed legislation it empowers the Government to overwrite the internationally accepted definition by the United Nations Refugee Convention, despite Australia being a signatory to the Convention.” The convention on refugees forbids the repatriation of refugees and asylum seekers if there is as little as a 10 percent chance they will be persecuted or tortured in their home country. Australia's new law bypasses this principle, saying that asylum seekers and refugees can be returned when the risk of persecution, torture, or death is as high as 50 percent, because for the government “it is irrelevant whether Australia has non-refoulement obligations in respect of an unlawful non-citizen.” Many of those seeking asylum in Australia come from Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Iraq, and Iran, travelling by boat from Indonesia. They are typically intercepted by the Australian navy before reaching land, and are then sent to detention camps in Papua New Guinea and Nauru, a small Micronesian nation. The conditions at the camps have been condemned by Church leaders and human rights groups; in February, an Iranian asylum seeker was murdered and 77 were injured at Papua New Guinea's Manus Island detention center. More than 2,100 are held in the camps, which have been affected by violence, sexual assault, and suicide attempts. Australia recently reached an agreement with Cambodia to resettle some asylum seekers in the southeast Asian country. Read more

2014-12-10T09:04:00+00:00

Vatican City, Dec 10, 2014 / 02:04 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The Synod of Bishops announced Tuesday it had released its prepatory document for the 2015 Synod on the Family, asking that bishops avoid formulating pastoral care merely in terms based on doctrine. The Dec. 9 document, known as a “lineamenta”, is composed of the concluding report from the 2014 synod, as well as a series of 46 questions to be delivered to bishops conferences, Eastern Catholic synods, religious superiors, and dicasteries, as well as academic institutions and ecclesial movements. “The questions posed here, which refer to first part of the synod's final report,” the introduction to the first part of the questionnaire says, “are intended to assist the bishops' conferences in their reflection and to avoid, in their responses, a formulation of pastoral care based simply on an application of doctrine.” This, the synod secretariat suggested, “would not respect the conclusions of the Extraordinary Synodal Assembly and would lead their reflection far from the path already indicated.” The lineamenta is currently in Italian, but will soon be translated into other languages. Responses to the questions must be returned to the synod's secretariat by April 15, 2015, so that the working guideline for the autumn synod, set for Oct. 4-25, can be published in a timely manner. The questionnaire is divided into three parts: “Listening: the context and challenges of family”; “The gaze set on Christ: the Gospel of the family”; and “The Confrontation: pastoral perspectives.” The first, introductory, and comprehensive question is: “Does the description of the reality of family presented by the Synod’s final report corresponds to what is experienced in the Church and in today’s society? Are there missing aspects, and how can they eventually be implemented in the report?” The questions, and the introductions to each part of the questionnaire, reveal that for the secretariat of the Synod of Bishops, pastoral care is the primary goal. The introduction of the third part of the questionnaire states that “it is important to be driven by the pastoral approach that the Extraordinary Synod began, which is grounded in the Second Vatican Council and in Pope Francis' Magisterium.” Bishops conferences “are entrusted with continuing to examine” the pastoral approach, “involving, in the most opportune way, all levels of the local Church, thus providing concrete instances in their specific contexts.” The lineamenta adds that “efforts should be made not to start again from zero, but to continue the path taken by the extraordinary synod as a starting point.” The questions also deal with some of the most controversial discussions that took place during the 2014 synod, including pastoral care for homosexual persons and for the divorced and remarried. The document stressed mercy for injured and fragile families, and underscored that the synod fathers “courageously and openly” addressed the issue of the Church’s approach toward “Catholics who are bound by an only civil bound; who still cohabitate; and who, after a valid marriage, have divorced and civilly remarried.” One of its questions asks, “How to help to understand that no one is excluded by the God’s mercy and how to express this truth in the Church’s pastoral action toward families, in particular the injured and fragile ones?” And what are “the criteria for a correct pastoral discerning of each situation,” which “must be considered in light of the Church’s teaching, that marriage is characterized by unity, indissolubility, and openness to children?” It also asks what “possible steps” there are regarding “pastoral and sacramental care” for the divorced and remarried. “What suggestions are there for eliminating types of impediments that aren't warranted or necessary?” Regarding care for homosexuals, “How can the Christian community direct its pastoral attention to families with persons with a homosexual tendency? Avoiding any unjust discrimination, how can it take care of people in these situations in the light of the Gospel? How can  the demands of God's will in their situation be proposed?” On the basis of the responses to these questions, the general secretariat of the Synod of the Bishops will issue a working document. Starting from this latter, the synod fathers will open their discussion at the 2015 ordinary synod. Read more

2014-12-10T07:01:00+00:00

Vatican City, Dec 10, 2014 / 12:01 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Cardinal Jorge Maria Mejìa, a former prefect of the Vatican Apostolic Library and a longtime friend of Pope Francis, died on Tuesday Dec. 9. The Pope had been visiting the cardinal since... Read more

2014-12-10T05:02:00+00:00

London, England, Dec 9, 2014 / 10:02 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Most people “still don’t know how Pope Francis thinks,” says a longtime Catholic observer who believes the Pope’s approach to politics is an ordinary path that rejects both corruption and elite ideological obsessions isolated from real people. “What he hoped for was a government rooted in the values and priorities of ordinary folk,” British author Austen Ivereigh said of the Pope's time as Archbishop of Buenos Aires. “Unchecked ambition, whether for power, money or popularity, expresses only a great interior emptiness,” then-Archbishop Jorge Maria Bergoglio said in 2000. “And those who are empty do not generate peace, joy, and hope, only suspicion. They do not create bonds.” The Pope is “a gospel radical” calling the Church to “dependence on Christ and the Holy Spirit rather than power and status,” Ivereigh said in a Dec. 6 essay in the British newspaper The Spectator. Ivereigh is the author of a new book “The Great Reformer: Francis and the Making of a Radical Pope.” He is a former press secretary for Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, the now-retired Archbishop of Westminster. He is also the also founder of Catholic Voices, a U.K.-based organization which trains Catholic laypeople to present the Church’s teachings in media outlets. He researched dozens of articles the future Pope wrote in spirituality journals from 1968 to 1992. “The articles also show a consistent theme: the danger of detached elites in love with their own ideas, divorced from the people,” said Ivereigh, who presented his own interpretation of the Pope’s social and political thought. In 1980, then-Father Jorge Mario Bergoglio was the provincial of the Society of Jesus in Argentina. He told the Jesuits that elites “do not see the real movement going on among God’s faithful people” and “fail to join in the march of history where God is saving us.” Father Bergoglio warned against the temptation for Jesuits to have “fascination for abstract ideologies that do not match our reality.” Rather, the future Pope said, social change must be people driven, not driven by, in Bergoglio’s words, “the arrogance of the enlightened.” According to Ivereigh, Father Bergoglio attracted “huge numbers of vocations” to the Jesuit order, but he also drew opposition from “a group of upper-class left-liberal Jesuit intellectuals” who lobbied the Jesuits’ Superior General to have Bergoglio and his allies removed. A leader in the campaign against Bergoglio objected that he encouraged praying the rosary and touching saints’ statues in the chapel. “This was something the poor did, the people of the pueblo, something that the worldwide Society of Jesus just doesn’t do,” the opponent of Bergoglio told Ivereigh. Ivereigh commented: “Given that he and his colleagues saw themselves as pro-poor progressives, it was a revealing remark. As Bergoglio used to put it, they were ‘for the people, but never with the people’.” Ivereigh said it is “a big mistake” to assume that Pope Francis is “just another liberal in the western mold.” He noted the Pope’s recent comments to the European Parliament and the Council of Europe, in which the Pope compared Europe to “a grandmother, no longer fertile and vibrant” and said that to achieve progress towards the future “we need the past, we need profound roots.” Ivereigh saw the Pope’s opposition to “gay marriage” as an embrace of “core human realities” like conjugal marriage and a child’s need for a father and a mother. He cited the Pope’s description of “gay marriage” as “an anthropological step backward.” The British writer categorized the Pope as “a conservative who has spent his life in opposition to the abstract ideologies of the Enlightenment.” He placed Pope Francis “firmly within the nationalist Catholic culture of Argentina that looks back to the Hapsburgs rather than the French revolution.” This view peaked as Bergoglio came of age in the 1940s and 1950s under the government of President Juan Peron, whose support for “the ‘popular’ and Catholic values of the immigrant classes” inflicted “a humiliating defeat on Argentina’s liberal establishment.” “For Francis, government has a deep and noble purpose: to serve the common good, to protect the vulnerable, to build up bonds of trust and reciprocity,” Ivereigh said. “What undermines it are abstract elites, disincarnate ideologies and politicians in it for themselves.” As Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Bergoglio criticized both the “deification of the state” and the “neoliberal evisceration of the state,” said Ivereigh, using the British term for free-market capitalism that rejects government welfare programs. Then-Archbishop Bergoglio believed that the only way out of Argentina’s crisis of widespread bankruptcy caused by debt-fueled consumption and public corruption was “to rebuild institutions from below, invigorating civil society so that it could hold both state and market to account.” Read more

2014-12-09T22:29:00+00:00

Vatican City, Dec 9, 2014 / 03:29 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Like a shepherd finding lost sheep, the Church is a joyful mother who goes out and seeks her lost children, inviting them to consolation of the tenderness of Jesus, said Pope Francis in his daily h... Read more

2014-12-09T20:08:00+00:00

Vatican City, Dec 9, 2014 / 01:08 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Rather than being called by his papal name “Benedict XVI,” the retired pontiff revealed that since his retirement he has wanted to return to his original priestly title and be called simply “Father Benedict.” Father Benedict made his comments in a private conversation with journalist Jorg Bremer, who published bits of them in a Dec. 7 article for German newspaper F.A.Z. According to the journalist, Benedict explained that when he initially stepped down he wanted to be called “Father Benedict” rather than Pope Emeritus or Benedict XVI, but “I was too weak at that point to enforce it.” At least part of the reason for wanting his new title to simply be “Father” rather than Pope Emeritus or Benedict XVI is to put more space between him and the role of the pope, so that there is no confusion as to who the “true Pope” is, Bremer reported. The retired pontiff encouraged the journalist to write about his desire, saying “Yes, do that; that would help.” In their conversation Benedict also spoke of his current relationship with Pope Francis, saying that “we maintain good contact (with each other).” “Francis has a strong presence. Much stronger that I could ever have with my physical and mental weaknesses,” he observed. “To remain in my office would not have been honest.” In his comments the former pontiff also touched on a new volume of his collected works that was released in German with an updated version of a 1972 essay, which no longer suggests that the divorced and remarried can receive Communion, as it once did. He referred to how some have suggested that by publishing the revisions now he was seeking to take an active role in debate surrounding the topic after this year’s extraordinary synod of bishops on the family. It is “utter nonsense” that his revisions to the essay were made in order to seek a platform in the post-synod conversation, Benedict explained. Rather than being outspoken, Benedict said that “I try to be as quiet as I can” about these things. Benedict XVI noted how he had originally made the revisions in August, two months before the synod began, and that there is “nothing new” it what was recently published. He also clarified that he has “always taken the position” that it is “impossible” for those who are divorced and remarried to receive the Eucharist. “As prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith I've written even more drastically,” he noted. Divorced and remarried Catholics, he said, need to “feel love of the Church” and should “not be burdened with more than they already have to deal with.” Read more

2014-12-09T18:50:00+00:00

Philadelphia, Pa., Dec 9, 2014 / 11:50 am (CNA).- Organizers for the World Meeting of Families have asked people to open their homes to host attendees and other visitors for the event, which will mark Pope Francis’ first visit to the U.S. “The excitement for the World Meeting of Families and Pope Francis' visit cannot be overstated,” Donna Farrell, executive director of the World Meeting of Families-Philadelphia 2015, said Dec. 3. She said there has been a “tremendously positive” response to the opening of registration for the event and to the announcement of the papal visit. She added: “we will need every housing option available.” The Philadelphia World Meeting of Families will take place Sept. 22-27, 2015. It is a global Catholic event which seeks to support and strengthen families. St. John Paul II founded the event in 1994, and it takes place every three years. More than 10,000 delegates from 150 countries are expected to attend the Congress of the World Meeting of Families at the Pennsylvania Convention Center. Pope Francis’ visit from Sept. 26-27 could draw over two million people. Organizers are asking residents from the Philadelphia metro region, including south New Jersey, Delaware and the Lehigh Valley, to host a family. Information about hosting is available at the World Meeting of Families website www.WorldMeeting2015.org under the “Get Involved” section. The event has partnered with the Ireland-based travel company Homestay.com, which helps resolve housing shortages during large-scale local events. Through the World Meeting of Families website, hosts can register a guest bedroom, a furnished apartment or a vacation house within a 120-mile radius of Philadelphia’s Center City region. Visiting individuals and families can then search a secure database of registered housing to find a match. Visitors will pay a nightly fee to host families that can be used to offset costs or returned to the visitors, as the host family sees fit. Farrell said the partnership with HomeStay.com provides “a terrific, cost-effective housing option.” “We often pride ourselves on the brotherly love and sisterly affection that defines our region,” she said, adding that hosting a family is “an excellent way to show exactly that.” Alan Clarke, CEO of Homestay.com, said that the family hosting program can encourage community and promote family while enriching the cultural experience of World Meeting of Families attendees.   Read more

2014-12-09T11:03:00+00:00

Milwaukee, Wis., Dec 9, 2014 / 04:03 am (CNA/EWTN News).- An anti-harassment training presentation at a Catholic college encourages employees to report critics of “gay marriage” – and could reflect recent federal decisions that the belief in marriage as a union of a man and a woman is discriminatory. Part of the employee anti-harassment training at the Wisconsin-based Marquette University includes a presentation with a comic strip-style story about a fictional employee named “Harassed Hans,” a man in a wheelchair. The training encourages Hans to report to the university human resources his co-workers Becky and Maria who “have been talking about their opposition to same-sex marriage” all week. “Their co-worker Hans is offended, but he struggles with whether to report the situation,” the comic says. “Hans is right to report Maria and Becky’s conversation,” the presentation later adds. The presentation shares the federal government’s new understanding that beliefs about marriage as a union only of one man and one woman can be a source of discrimination and illegal harassment. Since 2012, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has held “sex stereotypes” like “the belief that men should only date women or that women should only marry men” to be illegal discrimination on the basis of sex. This is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the commission said in a news briefing on enforcement protections for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) workers. Brian Dorrington, senior director of communications at Marquette University, told CNA Nov. 21 that the university requires all employees, faculty, staff and student employees, to complete an anti-harassment module “in accordance with federal law and university policy,” He added that harassment training “includes the latest changes in law, and workplace diversity training reflects developing regulations.” He said the presentation uses “hypothetical scenarios” are “teaching tools do not necessarily equate to university policy.” “They are simply tools to raise awareness of various forms of harassment that could arise,” he said, adding that any specific harassment case “would be reviewed on an individual basis.” The presentation is from the Austin, Texas-based company Workplace Answers. Dorrington said Workplace Answers has partnered with seven Jesuit universities in addition to other prominent colleges and universities. CNA repeatedly contacted Workplace Answers for comment but did not receive a reply. However, one spokeswoman for the federal commission that helps regulate workplace behavior and policy indicated that “gay marriage” opposition can be considered harassment. Christine Nazer, a public affairs specialist for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, told CNA Dec. 4 that courts have found “particular pejorative behavior or remarks about same-sex relationships to be potential harassment (which employers may act to stop even if it has not yet risen to the actionable level of severe or pervasive), or alternatively to be evidence of discriminatory motivation in a termination case.” Marquette University’s “hiring for mission” policy describes the university as an equal opportunity employer and rejects illegal discrimination, though it also professes the right and duty to hire employees who will “make a positive contribution to its religious character.” Nazer said standards of unlawful harassment apply to colleges and universities, news and entertainment media companies, and political parties and political campaigns under two separate federal acts that regulate businesses with 15 or more employees or 20 or more employees, respectively. The commission also recommends anti-harassment training for managers and employees to prevent and correct unlawful harassment. The Marquette University anti-harassment presentation says Hans eventually talks to human resources after another week of listening to Maria and Becky criticize “gay marriage.” Becky is shown telling Maria that his complaint is “ridiculous.” “I can’t believe he’s trying to trample on my free speech rights.” Maria replies: “Why does he even care? Is he gay?” The presentation continues: “Even though Becky and Maria were only expressing their opinions and didn't mean to offend, they could still be engaging in harassment. The complainant does not need to be involved in the conversation to be offended. Hans’ sexual orientation is also irrelevant; he does not need to be gay to be offended by his coworkers’ discussion of same-sex marriage.” The presentation said it is important that Hans “report potential harassment right away” because it will increase his credibility and give his employer a chance to investigate and “makes it less likely the offensive behavior will not recur.” The presentation then displays a “liability avoidance tip.” “Although employees have free speech rights under the United States Constitution, in academic and other workplaces those rights are limited when they infringe upon another person’s right to work in an environment free of unlawful harassment.” The presentation’s approach to marriage drew criticism from Jennifer Roback Morse, founder and president of the San Diego-based Ruth Institute. She suggests it is an example of the “irrational” nature of the Sexual Revolution and the redefinition of marriage. “It is simply untrue that men and women are interchangeable. This is what one has to believe in order to believe that removing the gender requirement from marriage is a good thing,” said Dec. 4. “Because it is irrational, it is necessarily totalitarian,” she added. “Once we commit ourselves to doing the impossible, we will need to marshal a lot of government force to get the job done. It will take a lot of propaganda in order to make the impossible appear possible.” Marquette University is presently in a controversy over claims that a graduate student teaching an ethics class, in an after-class discussion, told a student that arguing against “gay marriage” could be offensive to homosexuals and the student did not have the right to make “homophobic” comments. She invited the student to drop the class, Inside Higher Ed reports. The teacher also reportedly asked the student whether he was recording the conversation on his cell phone. He allegedly lied and said he was not. Dorrington said the university is “taking appropriate steps” to ensure that everyone involved in this controversy is treated fairly in the dispute. He said the university is committed to debate and discussion as “essential elements of our intellectual environment at Marquette, where our faculty and students have the ability to explore ideas, express opinions and participate in discussion.” Nazer said that legal exemptions allow primarily religious, non-profit organizations to prefer people who share their religion. “The exception does not allow religious organizations otherwise to discriminate in employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability,” she said. The EEOC is not the only source of rules and regulations apparently barring criticism of “gay marriage” and related issues. The Department of Labor on Dec. 3 finalized a rule implementing President Barack Obama’s executive order barring federal government contractors from discrimination on the basis of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.” The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, in a Dec. 5 statement, said that Catholic teaching rejects unjust discrimination, but added that the executive order and its regulations appear to go further than this. “In particular, they appear also to prohibit employers’ religious and moral disapproval of same-sex sexual conduct, which creates a serious threat to freedom of conscience and religious liberty,” several chairmen of U.S. bishops’ conference committees and subcommittees said. Citing the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the bishops said that “under no circumstances” may Catholics approve of homosexual conduct. Read more



TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

What type of wood was Noah’s Ark made from?

Select your answer to see how you score.


Browse Our Archives