Exposing Dan Skogen (In the Nicest Way Possible)

Exposing Dan Skogen (In the Nicest Way Possible) August 23, 2018

Dan Skogen maintains a web site, Exposing the ELCA, exclusively focused on exposing the heterodoxy (from his perspective) of my denomination, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

I’ve never quite understood how someone could sustain such concern and disdain over such a long period of time, but clearly one of Dan’s spiritual gifts is tenacity.

I would mostly leave Dan to his own project, if it weren’t for the fact that quite frequently I get messages from  colleagues in my denomination seeking resources they can use to respond to the concern some of their parishioners raise when they read Dan’s site.

For this reason, and also in an attempt to as charitably and carefully respond to Dan as I can, I offer this post.

The Three Problems With Exposing the ELCA

His Main Mode Is Deception and Distortion

Dan Skogen, author of the blog Exposing the ELCA

Over the years, Dan Skogen has acquired multiple web sites with titles similar to the web sites of synods, churches, and individuals in the ELCA. He uses these web sites to redirect people to his own page. The list of web sites Dan maintains deceitfully is really, really long.

Second, one of Dan’s favorite activities is to enter into social media spaces of ELCA folks, and then take screen shots of their posts. You can see how obsessively this is the center of his “reporting” by simply visiting his blog. Finally, Dan chooses to take almost everything out of its wider context, and he never posts anything positive about the ELCA, even though I’m sure there are many things done in our congregations and ministries with which he agrees or would support.

He’s A Fundamentalist Who Thinks He’s a Lutheran

Dan Skogen loves Ken Ham. Like, really loves him. And apparently the feeling is mutual, as Ken Ham sometimes re-posts articles by Dan. Now, I don’t really have a lot directly to say about Ken Ham, but I would point out that Ken Ham isn’t a Lutheran. He’s not even close to being a Lutheran. So Ken Ham as a litmus test for the relative Lutheran-ness of the ELCA is kind of a problem.

Dan’s also really into the whole evangelical Zionist thing. Again, I don’t have a huge dog in this fight, as I’m not an evangelical. But you can hardly expect a Lutheran denomination to use Evangelical Zionism as a central category. And since a sister synod of the ELCA, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Jordan and the Holy Land, is located in Palestinian lands, it makes much sense that the ELCA would accompany their brothers and sisters in Christ in their advocacy and work.

He’s Over-Focused on Sexuality

Okay, I get it. He doesn’t like it that the ELCA is inclusive. He’s hot and bothered that same-gender couples get married in our denomination, LGBTQ+ people serve in our leadership, and that trans youth speak at our national youth gatherings. And we’re proud, very proud, of our inclusion and welcome.

But sexuality is not a core doctrinal issue. It certainly has not historically (over the long history of Christianity) been a high enough issue to be church dividing. In fact historically, if you think theologically, a greater sin is schism. Leaving the church for non-essentials is more sinful than sins centered in sexuality. Yet Dan calls for schism in almost every post.

The Three Blessings Of Skogen’s Project

His Blog Functions Like An ELCA Newsletter

Confession: Probably at least once a month I visit Dan’s web site to see what’s bugging him lately. Often, I discover tweets from leaders I love, or news about ministries in my denomination worth celebrating. He’s actually an excellent news sources for us, because he scrutinizes the ELCA so intensely and regularly.

He Helps Me Understand How We Are Faithful and Edgy

Sometimes you don’t know what you’ve got, or what you’re doing that is innovative or good, until it bothers someone. So Dan serves a little bit like a canary in the coal mine. He lets me know more about us as a denomination, how we are being perceived. So thank you, Dan, for offering a glimpse back at us, even if the mirror we’re seeing is somewhat distorted by your reactionary ire.

It’s a Product of Iowa

Dan lives in Iowa. I’m from Iowa. Sometimes I feel like a blog like Dan’s could only be a product of a Midwesterner. Some day I’d like to go walk around the Iowa State Fair with Dan, and talk and get to know him. To date I have been unable to do so, as he doesn’t respond to messages. He also doesn’t re-post comments on his blog from anyone who disagrees with or challenges him, so fair warning, there are many comments on his posts on his blog you can’t see, because they scare him and he won’t release them. Recently, and lately, the ones from me simply say, “Dan, I love you.”

"No trolling intended. But there is a big difference between doing something (which implies accomplishing) ..."

It’s the end of white America ..."
"OK. "Anglo" doesn't really mean that, does it."

It’s the end of white America ..."
"You are replying to a post I made 2 months ago. Are you trolling blogs ..."

It’s the end of white America ..."
"I appreciate the point about non-Christians loving Jesus. I have heard so many claims that ..."

Just Something About Jesus

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • jekylldoc

    This may not be full-on “love your enemies,” but I congratulate you on coming closer to reconciliation dialogue than to flame war.

  • Just-a-me

    “But sexuality is not a core doctrinal issue.”
    You presume that the issue is with sexuality. However, recent evidence from both Brown University’s studied, which they pulled for expedient reasons–not because the science was bad, mind you. And a study from the University of Texas also subject to expedient scrutiny SUGGESTS that LGBTQ as a “movement” tends to be oppressive, certainly increasing in population despite explanation of biological origins.
    These communities also tend to suffer from high drug use and suicidality on measure much higher than their heterosexual counterparts. Therefore, the evidence suggests that this community is exposing children to dangerous mentalities, and to call it a “sexuality issue” is to shrug your shoulder at dead kids.

  • Widuran

    LGBT is of Satan

  • Amy R. Manning

    I actually make approximately $10,000 to $12,000 monthly using the internet. I lost my job after doing work for the same company for years, I wanted trusted earnings. I was not researching for the “get rich overnight” packages you can find all over the internet. Those are all mlm programs or stuff in which you have to sell to your friends and relatives. The best part of working on the internet is that I am always home with the little kids and also I go on family vacation for long time. Honestly,it is actually easier than you would think. I got the instructions kit and within four weeks I started earning over $4,000 per month.You don’t need to be technical, but you should know how to use the internet. If you can fill forms and browse web sites, you can do it quite easily, You don’t even have to sell anything at all. It is as easy as being on any social media site.This is what i do… INCOME941.TUMBLR.COM

  • ACT I

    “Religion” is defined in just one place in the Bible, in James 1:27. According to that definition, none of Christianity (with, though, Quakerism being an exception) qualifies as a religion! Rather, Christianity is a sham.
    In the gospels, (true) religion is identified in Matthew 25 (the sheep and goats passage); in John 8 Jesus “argues” that human life is more important than the Law (recognized first by the oldest man
    present!); and the Good Samaritan parable in Luke is interesting because the Samaritan is the only religious person in the story! The ostensibly religious people in the story (the priest and Levite) are portrayed as irreligious!
    The obvious (?!) message of that parable is that having a clergy is a huge mistake! Nowhere in the gospels does Jesus advocate the creation of a new organization (inaccurately called a “religious” one), so that it’s unsurprising that Jesus didn’t advocate having a clergy; yet early in the history of
    Christianity some individuals with a psychological need to have control over the minds and lives of
    others (while also supplying themselves with employment!) started to do so. While doing so they borrowed ideas from the paganism of the time (e.g., Mithraism), so that virtually all of the theology and rituals created for Christianity has a pagan origin; and the Christianity they created was done to solidify their control over the sheep whom they attracted to their organization! Thus, they engaged in a “con game,” and most of those who were “hoodwinked” by these charlatans were too
    gullible—too lacking in intelligence—to realize that they were being “had”!

    Over the years some individuals (e.g., Charles Sheldon, In His Steps, 1896) have tried to awaken
    Christians from their “drug overdose;” but most Christian “sheep” have become addicted to this “drug,” and need their weekly “fix” (attendance at church) to help them cope through the rest of the
    week. In, e.g., the Scandinavian countries most have “come to their senses” and have, therefore, “emptied” the churches; here in the U.S., however, the brainwashing of people has been too effective for that to happen! It’s true that the “poisoning” accomplished by Dan Skogen is of an extreme sort; but other Christians are almost as much slaves to that sham “religion” known as Christianity as Skogen is! And I see no reason to expect a change in this sad situation!