The Kim Davis story is the latest log on the fire of imagined Christian persecution. Here is what their environment tells conservative American Christians:
- “Christian convictions are under attack as never before,” Republican candidate Mike Huckabee said. “We are moving rapidly toward the criminalization of Christianity.”
- Rick Santorum’s 2015 film, “One Generation Away,” reveals how long he fears we have until religious rights are swept away by the jackbooted liberals.
- “God’s Not Dead,” a film that imagines an America in which Christian students are persecuted by professors for their beliefs, was a surprise success in 2014 (my critique).
- Pundits assure us that laws requiring pastors to conduct same-sex marriages are around the corner.
- Pat Robertson, always quick to add thoughtful insight to bring a topic into focus said, “Christianity, the founding principle of this nation, is criminalized. You go to jail if you believe in God and stand fast for your beliefs against the onslaught of secular humanism.”
- And doesn’t the War on Christmas seem to come earlier each year?
Christian persecution is inescapable, so if you don’t see it, you must not be looking hard enough. The Bible makes this clear in a dozen places.
All who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted (2 Timothy 3:12).
Do not be surprised, brethren, if the world hates you (1 John 3:13).
Blessed are you when men hate you, and ostracize you, and insult you, and scorn your name as evil, for the sake of the Son of Man (Luke 6:22).
Not only is persecution to be expected, it’s a blessed thing, and conservative leaders capitalize on this. They fan the flames of persecution to help rally (and shake more money out of) the faithful.
Most atheists and those who insist on secular government would be surprised to find themselves accused of being behind this persecution. The Persecuted may point to other countries where preaching the Bible’s anti-gay message is prohibited, but that’s not the United States. More to the point, in any situation where pastors were forbidden from preaching or Christians were jailed for being Christian, every atheist I know would rally to their side. (Ignoring the bluster to the contrary, Kim Davis wasn’t jailed for being Christian; she was jailed for not doing her job.)
Freedom of speech means nothing if it doesn’t protect offensive speech, and a society where Christians can’t freely speak is (or may soon be) a society where atheists can’t freely speak.Imagined persecution is kept alive by Christian excesses—a public school with a Jesus painting, a Bible quote on the wall, or coaches who force students to pray, for example. When they are sued to stop, conservative Chicken Littles whine that the sky is falling, but there’s a difference between Christian rights and Christian excesses. When you have an unfair privilege and then that privilege is removed, you’re not being persecuted.
Why the persecution has traction
With atheists making clear that they want a secular public square where everyone can participate (yes, Christians, too), where’s the problem? Why doesn’t this defuse conservatives’ predictions of apocalypse, at least partially? I think the idea of persecution against Christians is sticky because, if the roles were reversed, persecution is exactly what they’d do!
Let me illustrate that with an anecdote from the book The Man Who Stayed Behind about the experiences of Sidney Rittenberg, a U.S. soldier who helped the Chinese against the Japanese during World War II. He came to appreciate the struggle of the Communists and remained in China to help after the war was over.
During the Cultural Revolution, he worked as a translator in a press agency. Society was chaotic during this period, with little central control, and one faction within the organization took control. This faction acted in the traditional Maoist manner by stamping down all dissent. Rittenberg was part of an opposing group that said that one of the goals of the Cultural Revolution was openness, and that all voices should be heard.
Eventually, Rittenberg’s faction was able to seize control, but the story doesn’t have a happy ending. Despite Rittenberg’s efforts, his faction resorted to the only way they knew to rule—totalitarianism. Openness was important when it suited them, but they in their turn shut it down when it became inconvenient.
Maybe it’s the different moral thinking that governs liberals and conservatives. Maybe Christianity’s totalitarian past reveals a theme that still animates Christians today. Efforts by some Christian leaders (or conservative politicians, who are often indistinguishable) to have things their way without compromise, reveal their view of how power should work. If atheists gained more power, they imagine, wouldn’t they do things the same way?
If they’d listen to us, they might find that secularists simply want a society that benefits everyone.
Ignorance, misery, and fear
[is] the soil in which religion flourishes best.
— Linda LaScola and Daniel Dennett
Image credit: Wikimedia