Philosopher Pulls a Sokal on Theology Conferences

Philosopher Pulls a Sokal on Theology Conferences September 28, 2012

I’m sure many of you are familiar with the now-infamous Sokal hoax, in which physicist Alan Sokal submitted an article to a postmodernist journal that was, quite literally, gibberish — they accepted it for publication, of course. Now a Belgian philosopher has pulled a similar hoax on two theology conferences.

Dr. Maarten Boudry made up a fake name (an anagram of his real name), Robert A. Maundy, and a fake university, College of the Holy Cross, and submitted a paper to present at a Christian philosophy conference held last year by the Association for Reformational Philosophy. The subject of the conference was “The Future of Creation Order.” You can see the abstract for that paper on page 42 of the link above. And it’s hilarious:

In the Darwinian perspective, order is not immanent in reality, but it is a self-affirming aspect of reality in so far as it is experienced by situated subjects. However, it is not so much reality that is self-affirming, but the creative order structuring reality which manifests itself to us. Being-whole, as opposed to being-one, underwrites our fundamental sense of locatedness and particularity in the universe. The valuation of order qua meaningful order, rather than order-in-itself, has been thoroughly objectified in the Darwinian worldview. This process of de-contextualization and reification of meaning has ultimately led to the establishment of ‘dis-order’ rather than ‘this-order’. As a result, Darwinian materialism confronts us with an eradication of meaning from the phenomenological experience of reality. Negative theology however suggests a revaluation of disorder as a necessary precondition of order, as that without which order could not be thought of in an orderly fashion. In that sense, dis-order dissolves into the manifestations of order transcending the materialist realm. Indeed, order becomes only transparent qua order in so far as it is situated against a background of chaos and meaninglessness. This binary opposition between order and dis-order, or between order and that which disrupts order, embodies a central paradox of Darwinian thinking. As Whitehead suggests, reality is not composed of disordered material substances, but as serially-ordered events that are experienced in a subjectively meaningful way. The question is not what structures order, but what structure is imposed on our transcendent conception of order. By narrowly focusing on the disorderly state of present-being, or the “incoherence of a primordial multiplicity”, as John Haught put it, Darwinian materialists lose sense of the ultimate order unfolding in the not-yet-being. Contrary to what Dawkins asserts, if we reframe our sense of locatedness of existence within a the space of radical contingency of spiritual destiny, then absolute order reemerges as an ontological possibility. The discourse of dis-order always already incorporates a creative moment that allows the self to transcend the context in which it finds itself, but also to find solace and responsiveness in an absolute Order which both engenders and withholds meaning. Creation is the condition of possibility of discourse which, in turn, evokes itself as presenting creation itself. Darwinian discourse is therefore just an emanation of the absolute discourse of dis-order, and not the other way around, as crude materialists such as Dawkins suggest.

The Christian philosophers apparently didn’t notice that this was just a bunch of meaningless babble, put together to sound really sophisticated. Word salad for the win!

"You do know that lots of jobs don't provide health insurance right? No, of course ..."

Study: 45,000 Deaths Per Year Due ..."
"Feel free to rejoin the human species any time."

Study: 45,000 Deaths Per Year Due ..."
"if these 45,000 "working-age" people worked, then maybe they'd have health insurance. lol as if ..."

Study: 45,000 Deaths Per Year Due ..."

Browse Our Archives