Egyptian Man Speaks Out Against Blasphemy Laws

Egyptian Man Speaks Out Against Blasphemy Laws October 25, 2012

Maikel Nabil Sanad is under investigation for blasphemy. His friend Alber Saber has already been charged and is in jail awaiting a trial. Sanad is bravely speaking out publicly against the barbarism of such laws in a column on the Foreign Policy website.

On October 7, 2012, the office of the Egyptian General Prosecutor decided to start an official investigation accusing me of “blasphemy” — or, as they call it, “insulting Islam.” My crime was expressing my atheist beliefs on my Twitter account. The Egyptian authorities also arrested my friend Alber Saber on similar charges. He remains in jail to this day.

Egypt has signed many international treaties that ensure freedom of expression, but the Egyptian penal code still has approximately 20 laws that make certain opinions a crime.

The specified offenses include criticizing the president, the parliament, the military, or the judiciary. Criticizing a foreign president, such as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Bashar Al-Assad, is also a crime, punishable with a three-year term in prison.

And he points out that a conviction is just the beginning. Once in prison, the real punishment begins:

When I learned of the charges against me and Saber, I remembered my friend Kareem Amer, a famous Egyptian blogger who was sentenced to four years in prison in 2007 for insulting both Islam and then-President Mubarak. Kareem suffered a great deal in prison. He was tortured several times, and spent a long time in solitary confinement under horrible conditions.

Sanad has already spent time in prison for the “crime” of insulting the Egyptian military. And here’s how such laws operate:

Ayman’s case was followed in January 2012 by the case of Gamal Abdou Masoud, 17, a Christian from Asyut in Upper Egypt. Gamal was tagged on Facebook in a picture that criticized Islam. Angry mobs surrounded his house because of this picture, burned his house and the houses of other Christians in the village, and forced his family to leave. The police didn’t arrest anyone from the mobs. Instead, Gamal was sentenced to three years in prison for “insulting Islam.”

And the bottom line:

Religions are just collections of beliefs which can’t be proved. I still can’t imagine that in the twenty-first century there are people going to prison because they don’t believe that someone walked on water, a virgin gave birth to a child, or a man flew to heaven on a donkey. Tolerating this new Inquisition moves our world back to the Middle Ages, and this could have devastating consequences for our lives.

This is barbarism, pure and simple. I’m going to be writing a column for Secular World magazine starting with the next issue about free speech issues around the world. We need to take a stand on this principle. As Salman Rushdie says, “Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself.”

"Any chance that Mueller can up the pressure on the administration in time for us ..."

Popehat on the Fallout of Friday’s ..."
"There are excellent people on both sides."

Nazi Promises Violent Revenge for Conviction ..."
"After the shell casings hit the floor. Up until that point, he's an Upstanding Citizen. ..."

Nazi Promises Violent Revenge for Conviction ..."
"Yeah the crass hypocrisy of Trump is utterly obvious. But I'm not going to shed ..."

Trump Shows His Hypocrisy and Childishness ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • schmeer

    I had the opportunity to see Salman Rushdie speak in Washington DC when I was on vacation there two weeks ago. One of the questions from the audience asked how we can maintain a respectful attitude toward Islam with all the violence surrounding it. His answer was “I wouldn’t recommend it.”

    I think it’s apparent from blasphemy cases like these that we can’t worry about respecting Islam when Muslims are trying to inflict such heinous punishment on those who voice their opinions. There certainly is no concern by the Egyptian government or Islamic leaders for respecting the people with a differing viewpoint.

  • matty1

    I’d suggest instead of trying to respect ideas we restrict our respect to individuals and show that respect by allowing them the same freedoms we claim ourselves not by going out of our way to try and please them.

  • AsqJames

    Exactly, rather than respect “Islam” (or Christianity or Judaism or Buddhism or Atheism or Hinduism) we should respect Muslims (and Christians and Jews and Buddhists and Atheists and Hindus and everyone else) equally.

  • jedibear


    Theocracy, certainly. Perhaps even feudalism.

    But these sorts of laws are part of the modern world, not the strange excesses of primitive foreign societies.

    No institution is entitled to respect, and the respect due a person is limited to a consideration of their rights, not their feelings.

    Nobody has a right not to be offended.