FRC Contradicts Itself in Marriage Cases

FRC Contradicts Itself in Marriage Cases February 1, 2013

Right Wing Watch catches something important in the briefs filed by the Family Research Council in the two marriage equality cases being heard soon by the Supreme Court. In Hollingsworth v. Perry, the Prop 8 case from California, they argue this:

In sharp contrast to the “emerging awareness that liberty gives substantial protection to adult persons in deciding how to conduct their private lives in matters pertaining to sex,” Lawrence, 539 U.S. at 572, which, in turn, was based upon an examination of “our laws and traditions in the past half century, id. at 571, “[t]he history and tradition of the last fifty years have not shown the definition of marriage to include a union of two people regardless of their sex.” If anything, the fact that thirty States have amended their constitutions to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples strongly suggests that there is no “emerging awareness” that the right to marry extends to same-sex couples.

But in U.S. v Windsor, the DOMA case, they argue this:

Any lingering doubt that gays and lesbians are able to influence public policy, particularly with respect to the issue of same-sex marriage, should have been laid to rest by the results of the last election. Three States – Maine, Maryland and Washington, by popular vote, approved laws allowing same-sex marriage, and in a fourth State – Minnesota – voters rejected an amendment to the state constitution that would have prohibited same-sex marriage. Even in States where such amendments have been approved, the margin of victory has often been narrow, in some cases barely passing (as in California in 2008 and South Dakota in 2006), indicating that homosexuals, who comprise no more than one to two percent of the population, have succeeded in enlisting many heterosexuals to support their cause for same-sex marriage. In such a dynamic social and cultural environment, the belief that homosexuals are “politically powerless in the sense that they have no ability to attract the attention of the lawmakers,” strains credulity.

So when it suits their purposes in one case, all that matters is that 30 states have banned same-sex marriage (all prior to 2010). And when it suits their purposes in another case, all that matters is that the four states that had same-sex marriage on the ballot in 2012 all went in favor of equality. Heads they win, tails you lose.


Browse Our Archives