The Return of Matt Wykoff

The Return of Matt Wykoff December 2, 2013

Remember Matt Wykoff, the Catholic extremist who sends every atheist on the internet, including me, emails demanding that we shut down our websites and blogs or suffer the wrath of the One True Church? Well he’s back, sending me an email telling me that the earth is at the center of the universe.

1. There is no rational reason to reject the Our Lord Jesus Christ since it is scientifically demonstrated He is Divine and the One and Only True God. Only unscientific minds would reject empirical scientific evidence.

2.  The universe is geocentric. Every experiment designed to measure the speed of the earth through space has always returned a speed of zero just as the Bible claimed all along. Only prejudicial minds reject scientific facts. Your leading Pagan cosmology writers offer biases with no scientific proof . Unbeknownst to you is the fact that no one in all history has ever proven that the Earth moves in space. As an honest scientist Lincoln Barnett admits in his book endorsed by Einstein “…nor has any physical experiment ever proved that the Earth actually is in motion.” (Lincoln Barnet, The Universe and Dr. Einstein, p. 73.)  Einstein invented his relativity mythology to counter the Michelson-Morley experiments and other innumerable successor experiments demonstrating the earth is immobile in space and at the center of the universe.
“So which is real, the Ptolemaic or the Copernican system? Although it is not uncommon for people to say that Copernicus proved Ptolemy wrong, that is not true. As in the case our normal view versus that of the goldfish, one can use either picture as a model of the universe, for our observations of the heavens can be explained by assuming either the earth or the sun to be at rest.” (The Grand Design, Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, 2010, pp. 41-42) Hawking cannot face the empirical scientific evidence that Geocentrism is scientifically proven and heliocentrism disproven. In his bias he ridiculously opts to put the two systems on the same level.
3.  That the myth of Copernicanism is the foundation for modern man’s independence from God is a connection that was recognized by the editor of the world’s most prestigious scientific journal. When confronted in the late 1970s with the model of cosmology promoted by the evolutionist well-known physicist George F.R. Ellis – it promoted geocentrism – Paul C. W. Davies, the editor of Nature, was forced to reply: “His new theory seems quite consistent with our astronomical observations, even though it clashes with the thought that we are godless and making it on our own.” (P.C.W. Davies, “Cosmic Heresy?” Nature, 273:336, 1978. In the same article Davies admits: “…as we see only redshifts whichever direction we look in the sky, the only way in which this could be consistent with a gravitational explanation is if the Earth is situated at the center of an inhomogeneous Universe.” Confirming Davies’s agnosticism is a letter he wrote to Dr. Robert Sungenis on Aug. 9th, 2004, stating: “I have long argued against the notion of any sort of God who resides within time, and who preceded the universe.” Davies, however, is honest enough to admit he cannot lightly dismiss Ellis’ science and mathematics that connect the Earth with the center of the universe.
There is Absolutely No Salvation Outside the Catholic Church www.vaticancatholic.com 

I love this guy. I’m sure it comes as a shock that he thinks Pope Francis is a heretic and a false pope. Mel Gibson, call our office. As with the last time, he was easily goaded into sending more and more deranged emails. When I told him “You are absolutely hilarious. You should turn pro,” he sent this:

I hereby determine: You are unlawfully assembled and thus have to disperse or face punitive action. I hereby declare you to be a tumultuous and riotous-secularist assembly. Your dispersal is demanded. I repeat: you are unlawfully, riotously, and tumultuously assembled together. The Sovereign Jurisdiction of the Holy Roman Church doth strictly charge and command all manner of persons here assembled immediately to disperse themselves and peaceably depart to their own homes. You could be arrested and or subject to other policy actions. For there is Absolutely No salvation Outside the Catholic Church see www.vaticancatholic.com

There is no “evidence” for heliocentrist myth. Rational minds would not reject empirical scientific evidence. There is no shred of proof for heliocentrism – which in fact has been long invalidated and disproven. The secularist only offer your biases with no scientific proof whatsoever for their heliocentrist mythology. Heliocentrism is a long discredited myth. Galileo Galilei had no proof for his assertions. It is clear you and your ilk have no working knowledge of cosmology whatsoever.

Albert Einstein invented Special Relativity to counter experiments revealing that the Earth was motionless in space which then led him to General Relativity that forced him to accept a motionless Earth as a viable and worthy cosmological system. Heliocentrism is a system that failed for which Einstein decided to invent his relativity mythology to explain away the Michelson-Morley experiments and other innumerable successor experiments demonstrating the earth is immobile in space and at the center of the universe. So called self-described scientists are covering up the fact that there is no proof for their cherished view of cosmology.

“The Michelson-Morley experiment confronted scientists with an embarrassing alternative. On the one hand they could scrap the ether theory which had explained so many things about electricity, magnetism, and light. Or if they insisted on retaining the ether they had to abandon the still more venerable Copernican theory that the earth is in motion. To many physicists it seemed almost easier to believe that the earth stood still than that waves – light waves, electromagnetic waves – could exist without a medium to sustain them. It was a serious dilemma and one that split scientific thought for a quarter century. Many new hypotheses were advanced and rejected. The experiment was tried again by Morley and by others, with the same conclusion; the apparent velocity of the earth through the ether was zero.” (Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr. Einstein)

“A great deal of research has been carried out concerning the influence of the Earth’s movement. The results were always negative.” (Henri Poincare’, La science et l’hypothese, 1901, p.182)

“…to the question whether or not the motion of the Earth in space can be made perceptible in terrestrial experiments. We have already remarked…that all attempt of this nature let to a negative result. Before the theory of relativity was put forward, it was difficult to become reconciled to this negative result.” (Albert Einstein, “Relativity –The Special and General Theory,” cited in Stephen Hawking’s, A Stubbornly Persistent Illusion, 2007, p. 169)

“The data were almost unbelievable… There was only one other possible conclusion to draw – that the Earth was at rest.” (Bernard Jaffe, Michelson and the Speed of Light, 1960, p. 76)

“Thus, even now, three and a half centuries after Galileo…it is still remarkably difficult to say categorically whether the earth moves…” (Julian B. Barbour, Absolute or Relative Motion, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 226)

“Briefly, everything occurs as if the Earth were at rest…” (Henrick Lorentz, Lorentz’s 1886 paper, “On the Influence of the Earth’s Motion of Lumineferous Phenomena”)

“…we can take either the Earth or the Sun, or any other point for that matter, as the center of the solar system. This is certainly so for the purely kinematical problem of describing the planetary motions. It is also possible to take any point as the center even in dynamics, although recognition of this freedom of choice had to await the present century.” (Fred Hoyle, Nicolaus Copernicus: An Essay on his life and Work, p. 82. Also from the same book: “Today we cannot say that the Copernican theory is “right” and the Ptolemaic theory is “wrong” in any meaningful sense. The two theories are…physically equivalent to one another (ibid, p. 88) Physicist J.L McCauley who reviewed Hoyle’s book stated it was “The only brief account, using understandable modern terminology, of what Ptolemy and Copernicus really did. Epicycles are just data analysis (Fourier series), they don’t imply any underlying theory of mechanics. Copernicus did not prove that the Earth moves, he made the equivalent coordinate transformation and showed that an Earth-centered system and a sun-centered system describe the data with about the same number of epicycles. For the reader who wants to understand the history of ideas of motion, this is the only book aside from Barbour’s far more exhaustive treatment.”

Modern so called scientists freely admit that heliocentrism is merely the preferred model of cosmology and the choice to believe it is made purely on philosophical grounds and not scientific ones. Einstein’s relativity theory is an unprovable assumption which secularists unfortunately and desperately grasp onto and tout as “fact.”

After the famous Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887 Einstein’s biographer Ronald W. Clark describes what came next: “In the United States Albert Michelson and Edward Morley had performed an experiment which confronted scientists with an appalling choice. Designed to show the existence of the ether…it had yielded a null result, leaving science with the alternatives of tossing aside the key which had helped to explain the phenomena of electricity magnetism, and light or of deciding that the earth was not in fact moving at all.” (Einstein: The Life and Times, 1984, p. 57)

To save the world from having to reconnect with the Middle Ages Einstein set his mind to create the relativity myth that would cover up the Michelson-Morley experiment whose prima facie results showed the Earth wasn’t moving.

“No question about it: if STR [Special Theory of Relativity] is true then the logically understandable hierarchical and Earth-centered universe of antiquity and the Middle Ages was a pipe dream. The problem remains the “if” in the last sentence…in the present context I am satisfied with the undeniable actuality that though STR presumably allowed the astronomers to escape from a geocentric bugbear – and a daunting argument from design behind it – the GTR [General Theory of Relativity] has been compelled to declare the Earth-centered model “as good as anybody else’s but no better” … after Einstein…burst for the second time upon the scene the tables were turned…the geocentric model of the universe, be it absolutely unacceptable, science cannot show it to be wrong…the theoretical status of the Earth-centered concept is today under Einstein’s regimen higher than it has ever been since the 1687 publication of Newton’s Principia, the ruling model now “giving increased respectability to the geocentric picture.” (Walter van der Kamp. De Labore Solis, pp. 46-48, 55, 61)

Stephen Hawking writes: “The theory of relativity does, however, force us to change fundamentally our ideas of space and time. We must accept that time is not completely separate from and independent of space, but is combined with it to form an object called space-time” (A Brief History of Time, p. 23)

The Our Lord Jesus Christ is scientifically proven to be the One and Only God. To reject this is totally irrational.

Oh no! I’m unlawfully assembled and I’ve been ordered to disperse or face punishment? I wonder what that punishment will be? Oh wait, I asked him:

The Almighty God Lord Jesus Christ will lock you in the eternal prison that exists at the center of this earth. That is the punitive action that will and shall occur to all the adjudicated cases of the infidel at the moment of the Particular Judgment.

If there were a Catholic Kingdom today: it would invade the united states and march on each state capital to demand that the governors of these 50 states immediately initiate the process of an orderly dissolution of the federal government through secession and reclamation of federally held property.

Obviously since the Catholic State is forgiving it first offers the american government to go for an orderly peaceful dissolution as a way for america to do it the easy way. This would be in the best interest of all state capitols nationwide. It should be a non-violent event if the government so chooses. It should be a non-violent event unless the government chooses to make it violent. The Catholic State would also invade all america’s allies for their crimes against God and humanity– namely blasphemy, abortions, and contraceptions. A Catholic Kingdom would call upon all the Catholics to bring to bear upon the enemy state and to do all in their power to lend assistance physically, intellectually, and spiritually to this most holy endeavor and thus launch the Crusade (Holy War) to save western civilization from itself, the pit of hell, and also from collapse.

It is hereby determined.

I told him to let me know when he gets that Catholic Kingdom together and invades the United States. That will be fun to watch on TV. Rosaries aren’t much of a match for Tomahawk missiles. But wait, there’s more:

The united states is a kosher certified and privately owned judeophile corporation. It is the Whore of Babylon prophesied in Apocalypse Chapter 18. It’s destruction is imminent. The reason why Obama is extremely aggressive in his push for unnatural perversion both globally and domestically is unfortunately because Obama is himself afflicted with the unnatural vice. Pervert-advocating organizations around the country are saying his administration has been the most aggressive for them in the history of the US in regards to his promotion and implementation of this. Researchers point out that as a boy just over age ten Obama began seeing his father and spending time with him: the Hawaiian Communist Frank Marshall Davis. That it was in these encounters that he developed the unnatural vice because his father treated him in an indecent fashion. His mother Stanley Ann Dunham and her parents were members of the American Communist Party. She conceived Obama when she was around age 18 and Davis is 38 years older than her. Ann probably refused to have what was then called a ‘back alley’ abortion. Experts also point out that the reason why Obama released a fake birth certificate is because he is trying to hide who his real father is (he isn’t a citizen anyways because he decided to live in Indonesia: and Indonesia at that time required persons to renounce their citizenship to other countries if they wanted to remain residents). Frank Marshall Davis was a very active Communist that published obscene works and also ran an immoral photography studio: Ann Dunham was one of the women he took photos of. Davis married his first wife Thelma Boyd and it lasted 13 years. Davis was an adulterer for he had a second wife named Helen Canfield Davis (got married in 1946 and she’s 19 years younger than him): both of whom moved to Hawaii in 1948 because he felt it was more tolerant of couples with different skin color. They had 4 daughters and a son and divorced in 1970. In his own obscene autobiography Davis mentioned that he and his wife engaged in indecent immorality with Ann Dunham. He said they began doing this when Ann Dunham was age 13 when she went to them and requested of this thing. She kept on returning for weeks and her aunt falsely thought she was in good hands. All 3 of them devoted themselves to indescribable things and it continued on for years. Davis said he and his wife had these encounters with Ann Dunham because he felt he did not want to disappoint Ann when she requested of this: and that it was mutual. He also said he thinks he did her a favor. So both of Obama’s parents were afflicted with the vice against nature. Frank Marshall Davis was 13 years older than Ann Dunham’s own father. The Jew Stanley Ann Dunham died at age 52 of ovarian cancer (according to the New York Times). The average life span for females with the unnatural vice is in the 50s. For men it is around age 40. This is mostly because of HIV and then some other diseases that can be contracted from unnatural activity.

So I said, “Very Mel Gibson of you.” Which prompted this reply:

Mel Gibson is an apostate. Hutton Gibson is also an apostate who no doubt is the primary influence in his son’s apostasy and slavish subservience to the Jews.

Yeah, if there’s one thing that is obvious about Mel Gibson it’s his “subservience to the Jews.”


Browse Our Archives