It’s really interesting to see how many people are calling John McCain a “true friend of Ukraine.”
I was there when he showed up on the Maidan unannounced. From the moment he showed up on the stage, the organic, grassroots nature of the revolution was compromised.
Ukraine’s adversaries still point to that moment as proof that the revolution expressed a U.S. foreign policy interest (or even staged by U.S. intelligence as an anti-Russian regional power move), rather than the genuine will of the Ukrainian people for dignity, human rights, and sovereignty.
So I see two visions—one where McCain’s “friendship” put U.S. power before the agency of Ukrainian citizens (and Ukrainian-Americans having no problem co-opting the democratic process of Ukrainian citizens) by so publicly deflecting from the actual demands of Ukrainian protesters, and the other, where defending U.S. power means actively diminishing the power of Russia (which, lets be honest, Putin is doing a fine job on his own) and therefore swooping in and “helping” Ukrainians transform their frustration with corruption into an anti-Russian caricature.
In both of these versions of of McCain’s supposed friendship, the sovereignty of Ukraine rests solely on the fragile support of the U.S. in Cold War-esque bipolar power politics. It’s as if Ukraine can’t just be free on its own.