Wright Gets his Luther On

Wright Gets his Luther On September 26, 2013

Found this interesting quote in N.T. Wright’s Romans commentary:

Paul’s whole thought is characterized by the free grace of God, and any suggestion that humans, whether Jewish or Gentile, might somehow put God in their debt, might perhaps earn their good standing within God’s people, would be anathema to him.

Of course, that is not all that N.T. Wright says about salvation, works, and assurance, but sure does not sound like works-righteousness to me.

"Jesus loves everyone. Race has no bounds in Christianity.However we should all obey the law ..."

Rachel Held Evans on Jesus the ..."
"Prof Wright is dealing with the fact that so many people have made PSA the ..."

Video of Tom Wright Explaining Penal ..."
"It makes perfect sense that Rachel Held Evans has jump aboard the Trump Derangement Syndrome ..."

Rachel Held Evans on Jesus the ..."
"I never said anything about marriage. And that responsibility can be fulfilled with an abortion, ..."

The Solution to American Tribalism is ..."

Browse Our Archives



TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Michael Hardin

    Splendid!

  • Peter

    ‘Faith without works is dead’ This is St Paul’s position. Works perhaps then keep our faith alive in us though they earn us no credit before God, nor cement our standing in the Christian community. Works are then our lubrication for faith; our compass for keeping to the right path. If so then works are done for our own sakes as much as for the repercussions upon others. ‘The good works God has given us to do’ means maybe our privilege is to be an agency of God’s; doing his works to his credit and to our gratitude for the opportunity. To expect favour from God, for say having done good works, means that God loves you more than others who ar enot Christians or not doing so much or such big good works, which maybe is why St Paul saw the belief in credit before God as anathema/best/Peter

  • Dave k

    I don’t think any roman catholic would disagree, which goes to show that Luther’s analysis went deeper.

  • Phil

    Is this the commentary in the NIB series, or his Paul For Everyone series?