Status Quæstionis on Qumran Studies

Status Quæstionis on Qumran Studies June 5, 2015

There is a lengthy review by James H. Charlesworth over at RBL on a new book about Qumran and the Scrolls. But in the review, Charlesworth sums up what he thinks are the six basic conclusions most Qumranologists would concur about:

The leading Qumranologists would tend to agree on the following six conclusions: (1) Qumran existed during the Hasmonean period (an inclusive claim because it admits the possibility of pre-100 “Essene” life at Qumran and can mean anytime from 152 to 67); 61 (2) the Qumran Scrolls and archaeology must be examined together in assessing Qumran history and archaeology and without misleading presuppositions; (3) ‘Ain Feshkha is related to Qumran; (4) some of the Qumran Scrolls (maybe less than ten of the one thousand known almost always in fragments) were composed at Qumran or finally edited there; (5) one room should be recognized as a scriptorium; and (6) the strict and probably celibate branch of the Essenes most likely lived at Qumran.

See more here.

"For grace comes to us in presence, power, and in our personal experience of each ..."

No, the Church as We Know ..."
"Adamson says: "This shifts the Church from a location-centric approach, to an audience-centric approach that ..."

No, the Church as We Know ..."
"I agree--and like the apostles saw, e.g Hosea 11:1, which we read was fulfilled in ..."

Melito of Sardis on Christ in ..."
"Agree, very good points, Salvatore. I think Jesus was alluding to more than just obvious ..."

Melito of Sardis on Christ in ..."

Browse Our Archives



TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment