Matthew and Paul Agreements # 1- Mission to the Gentiles

Matthew and Paul Agreements # 1- Mission to the Gentiles September 21, 2020

One aspect where Matthew and Paul obviously agree is the necessity of a mission to the Gentiles. Paul was a key protagonist in that mission – but not its only participant it should be remembered – and Matthew writes at a time when the writing is on the wall and the church is definitely heading in the direction of a Gentile majority in the foreseeable future. Paul described his own “conversion” to Christ as co-terminus with a call to be an apostle of Jesus to the Gentiles (Gal 1:16; 2:8; Rom 1:13; 11:13). Paul took the message of Jesus the Son of God to non-Jews and importantly fought for the equality of Jews in Christian assemblies as Gentiles and without having to first convert to Judaism and become proselytes. Paul is undoubtedly pro-Gentile mission, but is Matthew in agreement? The answer has to be a strong affirmative!

One the one hand, the Matthean Jesus maintains Jewish invectives against pagan impurity and immorality and uses the opprobrium “dogs” and “swine” for such persons (Matt 7:6; 15:26). The way of Gentiles is to be avoided (Matt 5:47; 6:7, 32; 18:17; 20:25). Jesus also limits his mission to the “lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matt 10:5; 15:24) and forbids his disciples from going to the “Gentiles” and “Samaritans” (Matt 10:5). Of course, that seems to be a temporary limitation only in effect until Jesus “saves his people from their sin” (Matt 1:20) which Jesus must first do to “fulfill all righteousness” and “fulfill” the Torah (Matt 3:15; 5:17).

On the other hand, Matthew is overwhelmingly pro-Gentile as evidenced by the inclusion of Gentile women in the Matthean genealogy including Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba (Matt 1:3, 5, 6). Jesus’s birth includes a visit from magi from the east to visit the king of the Jews (Matt 2:1-2). The ministry of Jesus has its beginnings deliberately located in “Galilee of the Gentiles” (Matt 4:15) which matches with Matthew’s scriptural location of Jesus’s ministry as intended to proclaim justice to the nations and to bring them hope (Matt 12:18-21) both passages quoting from Isaiah  9:1-2, and 42:1-4 respectively. Gentile supplicants who exhibit faith are exemplary figures as shown in the centurion whose faith is accented (Matt 8:5-12) and the same holds for the Canaanite woman (Matt 15:21-28). The Queen of the south of Solomon’s day is also held up as an exemplary Gentile (Matt 12:41-42). The parable of the wedding banquet suggests an open, inclusive, and non-discriminatory policy of acceptance into the kingdom (Matt 22:1-14). In the eschatological discourse, the gospel of the kingdom must be proclaimed to the whole world and only then does the end come (Matt 24:14). In addition, Matthew’s Great Commission is a strong statement that the post-Easter context was characterized by an intense sense of having a missionary vocation given by the risen Jesus to the church to proclaim Israel’s God, the Spirit, and the Messiah (Matt 28:16-20). Whatever differences Paul and Matthew have, affirming a mission to Gentiles, and making laudatory estimations of Gentile faith is not one of them.

See Brendan Byrne, “The Messiah in Whose Name ‘The Gentiles Will Hope’ (Matt 12:21): Gentile Inclusion as An Essential Element of Matthew’s Christology,” AusBR 50 (2002): 55-73; James LaGrand, The Earliest Christian Mission to “All Nations” in Light of Matthew’s Gospel (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999).

"I lean in the direction you are saying, however many American Christians have bought wholesale ..."

The Fundamentalist War on Wokeness is ..."
"My wife and I are Republicans and support Trumps policies for the most part not ..."

The Fundamentalist War on Wokeness is ..."
"I don’t understand the socialist part of your statement.But you’re right about when Jesus rules ..."

The Fundamentalist War on Wokeness is ..."

Browse Our Archives