I just started a new unit in my General Ethics classes with fifty juniors and seniors: Does ethics have anything to do with God?ย On a Catholic college campus, where a significant portion of the students are products of many years of parochial school education, this is a big issue. Religious folks have been known to argue that the only possible reliable foundation for moral absolutes is belief in God, implying either implicitly or explicitly that atheistic non-believers lack any reason to be moral. Yet my students know either intuitively or through personal experience that it is entirely possible for a dedicated atheist to be a highly moral person. How does that work?
I have been a person of faith, sometimes reluctantly, for my whole lifeโthe very existence of this blog is due to my continuing commitment to grappling with issues of faith in writing. Yet I have always been fascinated by atheism. Four years ago, my second blog post ever used Simone Weilโs comment that โAtheism is a purificationโ as a jumping off point, imagining how a season of atheism might be a healthy exercise for a person of faith.
Several years ago when I was chair of our philosophy department I was responsible for the two-semester capstone seminar required of all our senior majors. Each year during the summer I would send the rising senior majors a list of three or four possible topics to spend the fall semester working onโone year they chose โPhilosophy of Religion,โ not surprising since half of the eighteen seniors were Catholic seminarians (required by the diocese to major in philosophy in their undergraduate years).
Some of the seniors, particularly the seminarians, were probably surprised to see texts from avowed atheists such as Sigmund Freud, Daniel Dennett, and Richard Dawkins on the semester syllabus, but as a new professor in the theology department commented at the time, such works are โgood for themโ (the seminarians) to grapple with. Atheists, after all, struggle with the same issues as theistsโthey just do it a bit differently.
A recent episode of โOn Beingโ with Krista Tippett on our local NPR station was an hour-long discussion of these very issues. The show was a repeat of a 2012 interview with Alain de Botton. De Botton is trained as a philosopher, but is best known as a sort of Renaissance man whose popular books include The Consolations of Philosophy, How Proust Can Change Your Life, and Religion for Atheists. I knew I was going to enjoy the interview when it began with the following from de Botton: The most boring and unproductive question one can ask of any religion is whether it is true.
Alain de Botton and the School of Life
De Botton was raised in โa devoutly atheist family,โ a Jewish family fully aware of the enormous suffering Jews had suffered historically and particularly in the twentieth century, often in the name of religion. De Botton experienced in early adulthood what he described a โcrisis of faithlessness,โ during which he learned that there were a number of things tangentially associated with religion, including music, art, architecture, and moral guidance, that he found โincredibly interesting, fascinating, beautiful, [and] inspiring.โ Whatโs an atheist to do?
De Bottonโs story is a familiar one, regardless of oneโs beliefs concerning God. While stories of people who were raised in a religious household and became atheists as adults, as well as of people raised as atheists who became religious believers as adults, are out there, the more common story is of those who are so shaped by their early years that they find it impossible, in spite of good reasons to do so, to radically change that framework as adults. De Botton occasionally implies that he wishes he could become a theistโbut if there is something like a โreligious gene,โ he is lacking it. Knowing that the foundation of religious belief for many people is a feeling or experience, he notes that
Iโve not had this feeling . . . all I can report is that many of these bits of religion do impact me greatly. If I was different, I would be a believer, is all I can say. I can only speak from a non-believing position . . . I really donโt feel a belief in a divine being is something that rings bells with me. Iโm happy to be in the atheist box, but itโs a much broader box than we might have allowed for.
The power of how one is raised cannot be overestimated. De Botton has no more natural access to what it is like to be a person of faith than I, raised in an all-encompassing religious atmosphere, can pretend to know what it would be like to frame important issues as an atheist would.
And yet, de Botton continues, atheists and persons of faith have much in common. Neither atheists nor theists are necessarily happy to hear thisโeach side is taught that the other is the enemy, a phenomenon encouraged by popular writers from the atheist camp such as Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Sam Harris. De Botton reports that he is occasionally accused in emails or print of having โbetrayed atheism,โ professing that โI didnโt know thatโs what atheism was supposed to be about, being mean to religion . . . I think thereโs an image of the fierce atheist who has faith in science and ridicules all religious moments and religious impulses. I couldnโt be further from that point of view.โ Instead, he argues, religion has offered and continues to offer too much of importance to be rejected out of hand even if one is an atheist.
Anย awful lot that seems to us intrinsically religious is not; itโs part of the treasury of mankind. These religions at their highest points, at their most complex and subtle moments are far too interesting to be abandoned merely to those who believe in them . . . I think a lot of whatโs attractive in religion is that it puts us in a wider perspective both in time and in place because most of our lives are lived right up against the present moment . . . And suddenly, that brings a kind of calm to our inner lives because itโs nice to made to feel small against the backdrop of a vast universe.
Even if one sets arguments aboutย the existence and nature of God as well as speculation about what happens after we die aside, religion has much to offer even to the most secular person. โReligion is this long tradition of deep thinking and wrestling with the complexity of the human condition as much as about the nature of God.โ How then should we live? is a human question, not a religious question. We do not come into the world knowing how to navigate the minefield of human existenceโde Botton is more than happy to poach on the ideas offered by religion, just as religions have โhoovered upโ the best that the secular world has to offer since the beginning.
De Bottonโs โSchool of Life,โ now situated in many cities across the globe, โpicks up on the idea that we need guidance, that learning how to live is not something we just do spontaneously.โ At this thoroughly secular school one will hear sermons, experience what feels all the world like liturgy, and even perhaps sing some hymns, all intended to be in service to human needs that are far deeper than what religion ย one belongs to (if any). ย As Krista Tippett says in the interview, โWhat I see you doing is carving out what has been traditionally, religiously called โsacred spaceโ in secular culture.โ
Toward the end of the interview, Tippett also comments that โI do feel that another religious and particularly Christian impulse that you are taking up as an atheist is that of being evangelical, which is about spreading the good news that youโve discovered.โ The good news is that โthereโs so much more in common between believers and nonbelievers than weโre sometimes encouraged to think. At the very last moment under the stars we may differ about whatโs going on, but we can still have a very nice time together for a long, long part of this journey.โ
Just as many other supposedly incompatible binariesโRepublican/Democrat, conservative/liberal, and moreโatheists and religious folks need not be at permanent odds with each other. Each of us is human, sharing the same needs, hopes, and dreams that all human beings possess, no matter how we package them.