Idols and Icons

Idols and Icons August 31, 2017

Of all the lessons I’ve learned in my three decades of teaching, none is more important than remembering the difference between an idol and an icon. The same is true of the writing life. Immanuel Kant once said that the most sublime of all the commandments in the Jewish law was the Second Commandment, with its prohibition of idolatry. Kant knew that human beings are incurable idolaters–teachers need to be constantly aware of this.

idols

The story is told that St. Augustine used to get annoyed with his students when, as he pointed toward something he wished them to consider, they focused their attention on his finger instead. Something tells me, though, that Augustine was not that disturbed with the misdirected attention. He was the author of Confessions, after all. Now I understand fully his stature, that only the Apostle Paul had more to do with the invention of the Christian religion than Augustine. But if I were to subtitle Confessions, I would call it “Look At Me!” “Look at me as I steal a bunch of pears with my buddies for no reason!” “Aren’t you impressed with my encyclopedic knowledge of Scripture?” “My struggles with sexual promiscuity are fascinating, are they not?” “Be astounded by my intellect as I defeat the Manicheans in debate with one hand tied behind my back!” “Isn’t my mother Monica interesting, particularly because she’s my mother?”

Obviously I’m not a big fan, so perhaps I being a tad bit unfair. Every human being is born believing that he or she is the center of the universe and is continually surprised when no one else agrees. By the time adulthood comes, most of us have learned social techniques that help us manage this natural hardwiring. But there are some adult activities that regularly tempt us to continue thinking “well perhaps I’m the center of the universe after all.” Augustine participated in two of these activities, as do I—writing and teaching.

I started thinking about the writing angle on this at a workshop several summers ago in Collegeville, Minnesota, the place that has become my geographic center of spiritual gravity. I was having a ball. Essays were emerging, I saw two deer and an owl on the first day walking behind Lake Sagatagan, I had lunch with Brother John—it was all good. But I was reminded of what a foundationally selfish activity writing is. What on earth makes me think that it’s a good use of my time and someone else’s money for me to spend a week indulging in solitude, writing when I feel like it, eating when I feel like it, sleeping when the spirit moves me, strolling around aimlessly in outrageously perfect weather, with minimal structure and demands while Jeanne contends with real life at home?

Barbara Kingsolver suggests that a good question writers might want to ask themselves is “With Middlemarch and Pilgrim at Tinker Creek in the world, why would anyone be interested in this?” The question is particularly pertinent for me when I’m writing first person essays, what the writer-in-residence at the writers workshop described as a combination of memoir and philosophy. These essays eventually became the foundation of this blog, which today celebrates its fifth birthday. Memoir and blogging tend to be self-obsessed, so it is important to regularly ask “Why would anyone be interested in my life, my perspective on anything? Why would anyone other than my closest friends and family give a moment of attention to me?” The answer is obvious—they wouldn’t. So if there is no better reason for someone to read what I’ve written than that I’m the one who has written it, then I’d better spend my time doing something else.

Issues of self-obsession also arise in the teaching life. I’ve been a teacher for a lot longer than I’ve been writing essays and blogging, and had to face the fact early on that teaching also has all the marks of an ego-centered activity. The whole structure of higher education is organized around the idea that students will pay thousands of dollars per year to sit regularly in the presence of experts who will, in various ways, shape and mold their young charges into something useful and marketable. I spent many years of hard work and a lot of money in order to get to be one the shapers and molders. So listen to me, and find as many ways possible to let me know how brilliant I am on a regular basis.

But that, of course, is not how learning happens. Over the years I’ve come to realize that it is vitally important for me, every day in the classroom, to remember the difference between an idol and an icon. Both idols and icons are meant to be looked at, and as such must be capable of attracting attention. But attention is intended to stop at the idol—it is the final focus of the attention being paid. An icon, on the other hand, directs the attention through to something beyond, something other than, the icon itself. The idol says “Look at me!”, while the icon says “Let me show you this over here.” When the classroom is at its best, the energy is iconic, not idolatrous. Augustine’s annoyance with his third century CE class arose because his students were treating him as an idol, when he was trying to be an icon. “Don’t look at me—look through me to see something greater and more interesting than any of us.”

My father, who was an itinerant Baptist minister, once told me about a plaque on the back of a pulpit in a church where he was preaching for the first time one Sunday morning. Pulpits apparently often have sayings on the preacher’s side—“Let the words of mouth and the meditations of my heart be acceptable in your sight, O Lord my Strength and my Redeemer,” for instance. This plaque was unusual though. It bluntly asked What Are You Trying To Do To These People? And if your answer isn’t any better than “Trying to impress them with what I know, how smart I am, how spiritual I am, and how great I look in this suit,” then shut up and make it a short sermon. The same is true in the classroom and on the written page. What am I trying to do to these people, these students, those who might read this?

Once as I sat with the monks in the cavernous, yet intimate, St. John’s Abbey in Collegeville, Minnesota, the first line in our final response was “It is not you who are speaking.” It sure seems as if it is—that’s my voice in the classroom, those are my experiences and that’s my sense of humor woven into these words on the computer screen. If that’s all that’s going on, pay no attention. But every once in a while, maybe the teacher or the writer can be a point of contact between the familiar and something other, something transcendent and sacred. Don’t look at—look through. The full response at midday prayer was “It is not you who are speaking; It is the Spirit of God who speaks through you.”

"Thanks, Teresa, for your comments and personal experiences--they remind me of some of my own ..."

I am a white person. Does ..."
"I have a real problem with your sweeping assumption, Scott. While I do happen to ..."

I am a white person. Does ..."
"My church history professor friends would largely agree with your interpretation. Constantine was not at ..."

What Dr. Seuss Has to Say ..."
"What's more, like most "orthodoxy" defining moments, Nicea seems more to be about political stability ..."

What Dr. Seuss Has to Say ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Very nice. Several thoughts come to mind. I’d not related teaching to writing in the way that you have, but that’s perhaps because I read Paulo Freire before I ever started thinking about teaching. My struggle has always been to let the students let me out of the way so they can get to the material. Too often, though, I find students want to be treated like deposit boxes that would then regurgitate material from the bank and that the largest criticism of any of my teaching is that I don’t teach.

    As a side note on icons, Queen of Angels Abbey in Mount Angel Oregon has an icon workshop in the summers that is supposed to be really good if you ever want to write an icon.

    On a more pertinent note relating to your blog: Alasdair MacIntyre tries to act as an icon as well. He thinks it is not important what he says but that people look back at Aristotle, Thomas, and Marx to see what they said.

  • Reblogged this on Free-lance Christianity.

  • Bill Malloy

    To Vance, my thanks for yet another provocative and enlightening essay. Your contrasting of idol and icon prompted in me the unwritten phrase that the use of icon in terms of specific entertainment (or other) idols is perhaps the most pernicious of all misdirections in our society.
    Jeffery wrote “Too often, though, I find students want to be treated like deposit boxes that would then regurgitate material from the bank and that the largest criticism of any of my teaching is that I don’t teach.” This is the problem of the elementary foundations our young people are given, is it not? Such foundations have become more and more poisonous to our young. I once wrote an essay for a Psychology of Education class, with an overview of studies of “teachers’ favorites,” finding that those who become teachers are those who most emulate their own teachers, and are those who are most often the teachers’ pets. I think that this is not an unfair observation, and there’s the rub: Who is teaching, and how? On the one hand, there is the teacher who is force-feeding students in such a manner that all they know who (and how) to be is as a deposit box. On the other hand, there is the teacher who heroically approaches such “deposit boxes” with the intent of tearing them to shreds and freeing the student. A noble cause, which sometimes works, liberating students’ minds and souls from the confines imposed upon them.
    On a more personal note, Vance and I share St. John’s College as our alma mater. The first time I ever heard of it, one of my 12th grade teachers started the class off by reading a letter from his brother, a midshipman at the Naval Academy. A particular phrase stuck in my mind.
    “They don’t study anything, they just read books.” There, in fact, the tutors do their best, and sometimes fail, to stand out of the way. That is the best thing any teacher — even in elementary or high school — can do, easing up little by little as the student progresses from year to year. A student who is not shaped and confined to a deposit box is a treasure. A teacher who is able to “crack the safe” is a treasure, and all those who strive to do so are to be commended. Thank you both, and thanks to all such teachers.

  • Jeff, you are right–students often do want to be treated as deposit boxes. I call that the “gumball theory of pedagogy,” in which I, the teacher, have all the gumballs and will give each student one or two of them if they behave like good little trained monkeys. Bill, you are right that the best teachers will resist that at all costs. I consider it to be my greatest challenge as a teacher to refuse to play that game–I will not tell the students what to think, nor will I even reveal to them, if possible, what I think about whatever it is we are considering. I am a facilitator of learning, not a dispenser of gumballs.

  • Pingback: First Day of Classes - Freelance Christianity()