Arrest of shooting victim for feticide in Alabama — a preview of ‘coming attractions’?

Arrest of shooting victim for feticide in Alabama — a preview of ‘coming attractions’? June 28, 2019

Annie Laurie Gaylor
Co-President
Freedom From Religion Foundation

It sounds like something out of dystopian fiction, but it’s happening today in Alabama.

Marshae Jones, who was shot in the stomach when she was five months pregnant and miscarried the fetus last year, has just been charged with manslaughter. Yes, Jones, the victim of the shooting, has been charged. Yes, expulsion of a fetus is now manslaughter in Alabama.

Alabama infamously became the first state to pass a ban on abortion earlier this year. But that law hasn’t even gone into effect — and likely never will, since its obvious unconstitutionality will tie it up in court as a legal overreach by anti-abortion zealots.

The punitive law enforcement officers are literally blaming the victim: “The only true victim in this was the unborn baby,” says police Lt. Danny Reid.

The altercation occurred in the parking lot of a Dollar General store, according to news reports, and the argument with the other woman was about the impregnator.

“It was the mother of the child who initiated and continued the fight which resulted in the death of her own unborn baby,” Reid charges. My emphasis is added to the inflammatory and inaccurate language. Jones is only a “mother” if she already has born children. A fetus is not a “child” — despite what Alabama’s new law says. This law and the six-week ban on abortion passed this spring in Georgia, contain language endowing the conceptus, embryo or fetus with legal “personhood.”

If any law is to be applied here, it should be Alabama’s fetal homicide law. And if anyone should be charged, it ought to be the shooter. Alabama is one of 38 states with fetal homicide laws, which do not confer personhood on the fetus, but rather acknowledge the fetus as a victim when there is violence against a pregnant woman.

It’s all the pregnant woman’s fault: “When a five-month pregnant woman initiates a fight and attacks another person, I believe some responsibility lies with her as to any injury to her unborn child,” says Reid.

His statement encapsulates the growing trend to prosecute pregnant women for a number of transgressions. The New York Times last year produced an entire section, “A Woman’s Rights,” detailing distressing examples of how “a woman coping with the heartbreak of losing her pregnancy might also find herself facing jail time,” from being in a car accident to delivering a stillborn, falling down the stairs, failing a drug test because she ate a poppy seed bagel — or even taking legal drugs during pregnancy prescribed by their doctors.

It’s chilling to see U.S. law enforcement officers treating pregnant women like criminals, particularly women suffering from tragic accidents, illnesses, miscarriages or stillbirths. Pregnant women should not be living in a police state. Of course, the ideology underlining all of this is a misogynistic theology that treats women like sinners who are nothing better than incubators and breeders.

Photo: Marshae Jones. (Jefferson County Jail)

"Here is a picture of Trump in El Paso, Melania is holding a baby who ..."

El Paso, Netflix, Kashmir, and a ..."
"Our "fearless leader, in diapers" would like to MAWA, Make America White Again. Well, folks, ..."

Winning in court, striving on Capitol ..."
"Nope.Just religious imagery paid for with government funds.Any religion will have SOME who don't accept ..."

Keeping church and state separate does ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment