Relationship Status: It’s Complicated

Having been married for nearly 27 years, I’ve never been on a dating app nor used any of my own social media to meet people.  But I know of many happy couples who did meet that way, so I assume that if I were young and single, I’d probably also entrust complex algorithms to produce reasonable dating options for me worthy of a right swipe. 

Especially intriguing to me are the choices social media provides for identifying “relationship status.”  Sure, there are the usual categories – single, married, engaged, widowed, divorced – but these generic, rather traditional identifiers alone fail to capture the varied experience of human connection today.  Therefore, other common options available are “in a civil union” and “in a domestic partnership.”  Other, more purposefully vague descriptors  include “taken” and “in a relationship,” and you’ll even find some out-of-the box possibilities like “open relationship” and “swinger!”  But my favorite of all is probably also the most accurate:  “it’s complicated.”

This Sunday celebrates the most “it’s complicated” of all relationships:  the Solemnity of the Most Holy Trinity.   Surely, the most complex algorithm for the most profound reality in all of existence is the concept of one God in three persons. 

Say What?

But that’s what you get when you put a bunch of people around the board room table, debate the finer points of language and meaning, and then send out the resulting memo company-wide all but ensuring it will be misunderstood if read at all.   In other words, that’s what you get when Church councils attempt to weed out heresy by firming up doctrine.

The Trinity is not explicitly mentioned in the New Testament although some scholars point to the poetic language in John’s gospel as a precursor.  Later though, in the early centuries of Christianity, the concept is suggested in the writings of Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, Justin Martyr, Theophilous of Antioch, and Tertulian. 

But it wasn’t until the Council of Nicaea in 325 that the Holy Trinity was formulated into official Church doctrine.  As a way of countering false notions about the “persons” of the Trinity, Church leaders created the Nicene Creed emphasizing the word “homoousios,” meaning “one substance,” to describe the nature of God the Father and Jesus the Son.  But Nicaea had little to say about the Holy Spirit.  The Council of Constantinople in 381 later suggested that the Holy Spirit was “consubstantial” with the Father and the Son. 

Corporate Memo

One God in three persons?  Consubstantial?  Many Christians today admit that they don’t really understand the doctrine of the Trinity, and who can blame them?  Couldn’t the memo have come with a glossary?  Or pictures?  Or even just real-life words that make sense?

For centuries, people have tried to interpret the doctrine in more concrete terms to make it easier to understand.  One laudable attempt goes like this.  I am Mary Ann, but I’m also a wife, mother, sister, teacher, and writer.  I never stop being Mary Ann regardless of which role in which you encounter me.  Although the simplicity of this understanding is tempting, it doesn’t quite hit the mark though because the elements of the Trinity according to the doctrine are distinct “persons,” not just roles or functions. 

A Different View

Father Richard Rohr suggests that the best way to understand such a complex reality is to think of the Trinity as relationship itself.  Maybe it’s helpful to pay less attention to the specific nouns involved – father, son, spirit – and think of the entire concept as more of a verb.  The doctrine of the Trinity may well be the corporate-speak, confusing-memo version of what we might otherwise think of as the dynamic act of connection.  Relationship itself.  

There may be as many “relationship status” designations as there are relationships themselves.  But regardless of what we call them, being in true relationship – with God, with others, with the earth and all life that springs from it – is how we encounter the very “substance” of God.  In many ways, yes, “it’s complicated.”  But it’s not incomprehensible.  Simply put, God is Relationship.  Therefore, real relationship is our highest, most sacred calling.  To love is to participate in the divine dance here on earth.  Now, that’s an algorithm that works for me.