Virtue Signalling And Why It’s Okay To Care About The Things You Do

Virtue Signalling And Why It’s Okay To Care About The Things You Do April 18, 2019

So, here’s a meme:

It was the first thing I saw when I logged onto Facebook this morning. This photo, it’s worth noting, was taken by a man who won the Pulitzer prize for it but who later committed suicide. The child, whose name was Nyong, is now dead.

This horrific picture is expressing similar ideas to what many people have been sharing in the wake of the fire at Notre Dame. Said people are taking the time to show that there are much more pressing issues than the fire at Notre Dame that we ought to care about, and I agree. Really, I do.

I mean, at first glance, it seems like a goodhearted sentiment, right? But when you think about it, when you break this meme down, what it’s saying is that if you care about something and it’s not the worst thing, you’re wasting your energy. It’s suggesting that there is an “issue” hierarchy and we must only tackle one at a time starting with what we all deem the worst. The meme is hinting that we cannot care about all things that upset us at once. Ultimately, that means my blogging as Godless Mom is silly until I end the death penalty. Heck, ending the death penalty is ridiculous until we end child poverty. Or is child abuse the worst thing? Do we put off trying to end child abuse until we’ve solved climate change? ‘Cause climate change threatens our very existence, right.? It’s gotta be the most pressing issue there is.

That crack in my shower tiles has got a long time to wait for repair while we fix everything worse, then, right?

Of course, that’s utterly ridiculous.

The thing is, if I choose to spend Saturday fixing the crack in my tile, it doesn’t mean I don’t care about poverty or the death penalty or wrongful convictions anymore. I am not repairing the tile in place of caring about other issues. If I choose to send a few bucks to help rebuild a church, it doesn’t mean I’ll stop donating to Doctors Without Borders or the Innocence Project. People don’t care about Notre Dame in place of worse problems. Even the maker of this meme decided to make it when they could have been crowdfunding their way to a poverty-stricken country to teach people to grow their own food or build drinking water infrastructure. But the meme-maker didn’t. Instead, they hopped up on their high horse and dropped this exploitative image on us so they could feel superior to everyone who thought it was sad to see a 900-year-old piece of human history burned. It didn’t work though; I still care about losing historical sites like this and all at the same time I can continue to educate people on why the death penalty is terrible and try to normalize the state of being godless so that thirteen countries end its punishment by death. I can, and I do, care about these problems all at once.

With this meme, you are shaming people for having feelings about a building, an inanimate thing but I am sure you’ve been upset about losing or breaking an object before. With this meme, you’re criticizing people who took the time to express sadness over this burning cathedral, and yet, you’ve taken the time to do something even less productive.

If posting about the fire in Paris is considered low because more significant issues are left untackled in our world, how low can we consider taking time out of our day to criticize those who expressed sorrow at its destruction? I mean, you could have used that energy to start a GoFundMe to feed the starving children you’re so quick to exploit for likes.

This meme is not about caring about more significant things. This picture is not about feeling as though there are more outstanding issues. It’s more just about your need to be a contrarian. It’s about standing out from the crowd and propping yourself up on an unstable moral high horse so you can whiff a fleeting moment of superiority.

The fact is, we all care about things that may seem trivial to other people. The truth is, there’s always a more pressing issue. Shaming people is not the answer though, or you’re committing the very same crime. The answer is and always will be to use your energy to set an example. Talk, instead, about what you ARE doing to fix these more critical issues, rather than pointing out what everyone else isn’t doing. Show us how you’ve spent your time so much better than the rest of us. Give us your scorecard, if you will, because if it’s as impressive as you want us to believe, it might inspire others to do good, too.

Until you, yourself, have ceased spending a single moment talking about “trivial” things, though, don’t crap on other people for it. Your hypocrisy won’t feed a child.

If you like what I do here and want to support my work, you can donate here or become a patron here.

Image: Fair use/Kevin Carter

"What denial? I'm not sure you know what that word means. All I've done is ..."

6 Signs You Might Be An ..."
"Thank you for also confirming your condition of denial.You appear determined to demonstrate all the ..."

6 Signs You Might Be An ..."
"I've done no such thing. That's yet another assumption you are making because you've admitted ..."

6 Signs You Might Be An ..."
"Courtney, this is well said. Indeed, a nice summation of what is obviously wrong with ..."

7 Ways Christianity Teaches Arrogance

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Two quick comments, one stupid and one serious. First, the stupid one. Yes, I am convinced. I will focus on nothing but “manspreading” until this most serious of all atrocities has been fully eradicated. Okay, now for the serious one. We all have different priorities, and that is as it should be. It does not bother me when someone else is far more concerned about something I find trivial…until they try to persuade me that I should share their concern and condemn me when I don’t. Notre Dame is a great example. I have no attachment to it or any other building, and I don’t agree with those who have been suggesting that I am flawed if I don’t agree with them. As adults, we should be able to agree to disagree. The part of this that bugs me is when those trying to convince me decide that I must be demonized because I remain unconvinced.

  • I drew some ire for saying that, while I admire the building and hope that it’s repaired, the Roman Catholic Church is rich enough to pay for it. Why do they need help from anyone?

    But, hey, if others want to give cash to that outrageously wealthy cult, that’s their right. I won’t dog anyone for it.

  • persephone

    I hate those people. As a woman, I still occasionally get that tired argument from men that women in other parts of the world are suffering much more than me, so I don’t have the right to complain. Of course, these are the same men/boys that will bitch and moan about how their sandwich had too much mayo.

  • (((J_Enigma32)))

    But why bother trying to help when you can sit smugly superior and talk down too and judge people? I mean, it’s just so much easier and more satisfying to be pessimistic, cynical, and sarcastic all the while pissing on those who do care. Talk is cheap, and ultimately, so is their opinion.

  • Illithid

    Back off, Jack! If I sit with my legs primly together, important things get squished.

  • Martin Penwald

    I somewhat agree, but when Pinault and other parasites promise millions, it’s just a PR move that won’t cost them a cent : Emmanuel Moncon already said that there will be taxes incentives to give for reconstruction.

  • Martin Penwald

    There is no such thing as “too much mayo”.

  • wolfypuppy

    Brilliant! Just brilliant! This is the same as that conservative argument against American feminism because in other countries women have it worse.

  • Martin Penwald

    UPDATE : It seems that Emmanuel Moncon backed off. No special taxes incentives will be given for donation to the reconstruction efforts.