Arizona lawmaker tells colleagues he sees God in the gallery

Arizona lawmaker tells colleagues he sees God in the gallery February 19, 2019

Something happened on the floor of Arizona’s House of Representatives on Feb. 11 that was a shameful reminder that a sense of Christian privilege in America is as casually wrong-headed as it is common.

The incident followed a secular, humanist “prayer” (see video above) to open the day’s House session by Rep. Athena Salman, the chamber’s first openly avowed female atheist.

According to a report in the Phoenix New Times, the presentation focused innocuously on the natural glories of nature:

“Without invoking a deity, Salman had asked legislators to reflect on the ‘wonders of the universe’ and the diversity of life on an ‘insignificant planet in an insignificant galaxy.’”

Although the topic was seemingly noncontroversial, the New Times reported:

“The incident is the latest in a long-running feud between the Legislature’s cohort of the religious right and their secular-minded colleagues like Salman, a Democratic atheist from Tempe.”

Immediately after Rep. Salman’s short presentation, conservative Christian Republican Rep. John Kavanaugh of Fountain Hills took the floor to mock her, introducing “God” as his “guest” in the House gallery — “as he is everywhere , and the same God, who, by the way, created nature, which purportedly created this tiny speck of a planet in which this tiny speck of a Legislature legislates,” he snarkily added.

The rejoinder was delivered with the smug self-satisfaction of someone who believes what he believes is irrefutably infallible.

Yet — and I am bone-weary of repeating this truth — there is zero evidence that such an invisible omnipotent being as “God” exists anywhere. It’s just what Christians have convinced themselves exists.

Rep. Salman, for her part, later said she found Kavanaugh’s callous disrespect and ignorance so appalling that she declined to introduce her mother and grandmother, seated in the gallery, to the legislators.

“I was so ashamed, I didn’t even introduce them because of the behavior that we witnessed on the floor,” she said.

Coincidentally on Feb. 11, members of the Secular Coalition for Arizona were also in the House gallery for “Secular Day” at the Capitol for meetings with lawmakers and a press conference denouncing a state license plate that funds an anti-LGBTQ Christian legal advocacy group. See my Godzooks post on this topic here.

In a protest speech on the House floor the day after Rep. Kavanaugh’s showy retort, Rep. Salman protested his boorish behavior as “unbecoming of a member.”

“I rise to protest today because I want to make it clear I have never denigrated another member’s invocation. Yet for the third year in a row, members of this body have belittled my religious beliefs in ways that are humiliating and uncalled for.”

Put aside for a moment that atheism is not a religion and focus on the fact that what Kavanaugh is trying to force upon people is.

In an email statement to New Times, Rep. Kavanaugh insisted that his response to Rep. Salman’s secular invocation was a “friendly counterpoint,” but the combative text clearly indicated it was anything but.

He accused her of “hijacking … the prayer and turning it into a secular commercial for the Secular Coalition members in the gallery. I felt it proper to restore God to the prayer, which is the purpose of the prayer.”

This is the kind of mindless reactionary nonsense that gives even thoughtful conservatives an undeserved bad name.

Newsflash to Kavanaugh: A quarter of the U.S. population is now unaffiliated with any religious tradition or denomination, including agnostics and atheists, and many not only don’t pray but are offended by prayers in government venues and even consider them blatantly unconstitutional. Just because prayers have been said in government since the birth of the nation, doesn’t mean they’re automatically legally fine. Times change, people critically review the Constitution and rethink — and sometimes discontinue — long-practiced traditions.

In the more secular America of the 21st century, noting that the number of religious apathists has been surging for decades, what could be more appropriate than a nonreligious, humanist invocation — an upstart new tradition that makes far more sense than the old?

What annoys me about this entire incident is Kavanaugh’s apparently intractable belief that his superstitions are not only true but so manifestly true that anything that might imply noncompliance is to be scoffed at and slammed.

No.

In fact, Rep. Salman glorification of nature is far more rooted in reality and common sense than Rep. Kavanaugh’s invented deity.

The Christian faithful need to realize that American society is changing, much as it already has in Western Europe, and long-held supernatural assumptions are quickly becoming quaint, fading cultural relics of the past.

(Also check out Hemant Mehta’s Friendly Atheist blog post on this topic, here)

Video/YouTube

Please sign up (top right) to receive new Godzooks posts via email, Facebook or Twitter.

Available on Amazon!

FYI, Rick Snedeker’s new memoir — 3,001 Arabian Days — is now available in paperback and ebook formats on Amazon, here. It’s the story of growing up in an American oil camp in the Saudi Arabian desert from 1953-1962.

If you’ve already read “3,001 Arabian Days,” the author would be honored if you’d post a reader review on his Amazon page. Thanks!

Reader review: “Author Snedeker’s wit and insights illuminate the book’s easy narrative. His journalistic style faithfully recreates the people, places and events, and keeps the story crisp and moving from one chapter to the next. More than a coming of age story, 3,001 Arabian Days is a moving tribute to the intricacies of family, a celebration of Saudi Arabian culture, and a glimpse into a time gone by, but whose shadowy specter you can still almost reach out and touch.” — Mark Kennedy

"Exactly where it belongs, Johnson C."

South Dakota decides ‘In God We ..."
"Yeah, let's try that reasoning with the Powers that Be! What you say is true; ..."

South Dakota decides ‘In God We ..."
"If statements in favor of a god are not religious in nature, than churches cannot ..."

South Dakota decides ‘In God We ..."
"The display may take the form of a mounted plaque, student artwork, or any other ..."

South Dakota decides ‘In God We ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!