Could A Humanist Care Less About God ?

Could A Humanist Care Less About God ? January 15, 2020

At some point in recent Western history, the God idea became ‘simply incredible’ on the face of it for many educated people and indifference to God became the norm.

Sociologists, psychologists and religious scholars have pondered, pondered and pondered the reasons why so many modern Westerners abandoned belief in God.  But there’s one reason academics did not espy.

The God idea was itself a cause of incredulity among the educated classes: the anthropomorphic, emotion-laden, easily irritated, reliably biased, male God, who was always satisfied with a high degree of human and animal suffering, lost believability.

I ask humanists I meet to compose a short 200-word essay explaining why they disbelieve in God.  That would be about three paragraphs in this piece you are reading—not long.

But they refuse and tell me they would just as soon write 200 words on why they don’t believe in the Phoenix. To them, the notion of God is as fabulous as the Phoenix.  Why waste time composing 200 words justifying incredulity about the Phoenix?

This is a phenomenon particular to our time, because two hundred years prior skeptics would have been eager to make their case against God.

In the nineteenth century alone, freethinkers wrote scores and scores of books, and dozens of popular skeptical magazines sold in the millions in the UK and Australia, New Zealand, and in America.  Numerous skeptical organizations and secular societies emerged, and crowds of thousands gathered in buildings and open-air forums to hear brilliant, oratorically gifted skeptical speakers critique God and offer godless alternatives to religion.

Skeptics of those bygone generations would have sat down on the spot to write me that 200-word essay.  But not today.  And why not today?  Why is God ‘simply incredible’ to today’s educated humanist and a matter of indifference?

The answer is that religion in those earlier eras was hardy, and skeptics felt they had to challenge religion as an irrepressible opponent.

Then by degrees religion started to unravel like a mohair sweater that modern skeptics and modern events and even modern liberal theologians tugged at, loosening the threads, until the sweater was in tatters.  And the sweater was in tatters by the end of the sixth decade of the twentieth century.  By then it was an unmendable sweater, even for the most talented theological seamstress.  A generation of intellectuals was lost to God.

The ‘new’ atheists who tossed books up the best-seller lists in the early twenty-first century did not create their skeptical readership: those people already existed.

And now, a couple decades into the twenty-first century, the very latest version of unbelief is indifference to God owing to the complete implausibility of the God idea for these people and the feeling that, far from being hardy and stout, the God idea is anemic and on the way out.

Such individuals do not rise to the level and label of ‘atheist’ because an atheist is really still in the theological game.  An atheist is actually another kind of theologian, and often a better theologian than a believing theologian.

There’s no need for releasing the Searchers to find out the cause for current incredulity about God.  Look back to Norse religion as an example.  At some point in Norse history the God Thor became incredible at first glance and ceased to provoke a second glance.  The reason Thor became ‘simply incredible’ was not traceable to any psychological injury in the doubters.  The Thor idea was itself the cause of doubt.  And at some point no one needed to wrangle with apologists for Thor because Thor was fading like a chalk mark in a rainstorm.  Thor elicited only indifference.

To win back the indifferentists (as we may call today’s atheists), theologians would have to thoroughly renovate the idea of God, something that most theologians lack the nerve to try.  But it might make things interesting if they were to try.

Is there an idea of God that is not ‘simply incredible’ on the face of it?  Is there an idea of God that does not leave the Humanist in a state of serene indifference?

 

Featured image ‘Neerpede pylon art by MAE’ by Linda De Volder via Flickr

 

 

"If there's a god, is it the god of this planet or the god of ..."

Could A Humanist Care Less About ..."
"Another person who apparently hasn't read Age of Reason."

Thomas Paine Was No ‘Filthy Little ..."
"You apparently haven't read Age of Reason."

Thomas Paine Was No ‘Filthy Little ..."
"Best regards in the completion of your book. I know that is a demanding task."

Could A Humanist Care Less About ..."

Browse Our Archives



TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment