menu

Divine Determinism and Human Freedom: The Romans 9 Debate

Divine Determinism and Human Freedom: The Romans 9 Debate July 25, 2021

A long-standing debate regarding Roman 9 continues among informed laity, church denominations, theologians, and scholars on whether Paul teaches divine determinism in this passage. Does the passage teach double predestination and unconditional election of individuals? Do humans have a free choice if God elects some but rejects others? If God does the choosing and rejecting, why does he punish those whom he rejects as though they were at fault?

In this study on the subject, we will take a look at the tensions in Romans 9 and discuss first-century Jewish perceptions of divine determinism, which may have influenced Paul.

Romans 9: The Controversies

Paul, quoting the Old Testament (Genesis 25:23), speaks of God’s disclosure to the matriarch Rebecca while she was still pregnant with twins. God determines that the older twin would serve the younger. This is stated before either son could do anything good or bad—Esau happens to be the older son and Jacob the younger. God also claims that he loves Jacob but hates Esau (Rom 9:10–13; cf. Malachi 1:2–3).

In this passage, an imagined interlocutor raises two questions for Paul. First, he questions whether God is just for selecting Jacob over Esau (Rom 9:14). Paul claims that God has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills. The apostle refers to Exodus 9, a passage where it is said that God hardened Pharaoh’s heart so that he refused to let the children of Israel go from Egypt (Rom 9:15–18).

Second, the interlocutor questions why God finds fault with Pharaoh and other humans, for who can resist what God has determined for them to do (9:19)? Paul rebukes the questioner and then gives an illustration analogously relating God to a potter and humans as the clay. The clay has not right to question what the potter does when shaping the clay into a vessel for the potter’s purpose. God has every right to make one vessel for honorable use, and another for dishonorable use. God shapes certain “vessels of wrath” for destruction while the “vessels of mercy” are prepared beforehand for glory (9:19–23). That glory seems to be indicating eternal life and resurrection (see Romans 8:18, 29–30).

Calvinist and Reformed theologians have affirmed that Romans 9 is clear evidence that the Bible teaches double predestination of individuals. Arminian and Wesleyan theologians have denied that this is what Romans 9 means. They often affirm instead that the passage contextually refers to Israel and gentiles, two peoples rather than individuals. The Old Testament passages Paul cites ultimately serve to refer to God’s election of Jews and gentiles.

A number of biblical scholars maintain that Romans 9 must be read together as one unit with Romans 10–11, or the reader risks misinterpreting Paul. One must read Romans 9–11 together to discern fully that Paul is speaking about the election and salvation of the people of Israel, along with the gentiles, rather than the salvation and condemnation of individual humans as such.

So who is right?

The passage actually has a long interpretative history that is worth addressing. It dates back before the Protestant Reformation and the Calvinist and Arminian theologies that emerged from it. We will begin by first taking a look at some first-century Jewish viewpoints on divine determinism and human freedom that may have influenced Paul.

Divine Determinism in the First-Century Sects of Formative Judaism

It is clear that during the first century different Jewish groups had competing perspectives regarding predestination, divine election, and determinism and freewill. Notable among these groups was the Yahad or community in Qumran, from where we discovered the Dead Sea Scrolls.[1] A number of scholars suggest this group may have been the Essenes. Josephus refers to the group when discussing three major sects of Judaism and their views regarding determinism:

“Now for the Pharisees, they say that some actions, but not all, are the work of fate, and some of them are in our own power, and that they are liable to fate, but are not caused by fate. But the sect of the Essenes affirm, that fate governs all things, and that nothing befalls men but what is according to its determination. (173) And for the Sadducees, they take away fate, and say there is no such thing, and that the events of human affairs are not at its disposal; but they suppose that all our actions are in our own power, so that we are ourselves the cause of what is good, and receive what is evil from our own folly” (Josephus, Antiquities 13. 172-73).[2]

Of these three perspectives, the view that Paul would most naturally gravitate towards would be the one he learned—he was a Pharisee before believing in Jesus as Messiah (Philippians 3:4–8). As such, the moderate view of determinism would almost surely have been his perspective, at least until he encountered Jesus on the way to Damascus in Acts 9.

Even as a believer in Christ, we find the apostle holding in tension together a view that seems to honor both divine sovereignty and human freedom. He exhorts believers in Philippi to work out their own salvation with “fear and trembling” (Philippians 2:12). At the same time he also claims that it is God who works among them, both the willing and doing of his good pleasure (Phil 2:13). The Philippians are thus required and responsible for being obedient to God, and yet they can be assured that God empowers them for that very task.

Had these verses been written by the three Jewish sects Josephus mentioned, and we had to decide who wrote what, I suspect that most votes would be given to the Sadducees for writing Phil 2:12. The Essenes would be given the most votes for writing Phil 2:13. On the other hand, the Pharisees, like Paul, would seem to be most likely to embrace both verses. Paul’s view on such things probably would not be much different than what the early rabbinic writing, the Mishnah, claimed: “All is foreseen, but freedom of choice is given” (m. Pirqe Abot 3:16[15]; Danby tr.).

Reflection

We can affirm from Scripture that Paul inherited a Pharisaic balance on fate and freewill when he first became a believer in Christ. We cannot affirm with certainty that he still held to that balance later on, but Philippians 2:12–13 does lend itself to that possibility. What is perhaps more important, however, is for us to examine closely Paul’s own words in Romans 9. As well, a survey on how various theologians throughout church history have interpreted this chapter would seem to be in order. So stay tuned…


Notes

[1] See E. H. Merrill, Qumran and Predestination: A Theological Study of the Thanksgiving Hymns, JSJSup 7 (Leiden: Brill, 1975); cf. 1QS xi 10–11, 17–18; CD A ii 2–10; 1QHa vii 15–28. For early Judaism in on the subject, see Gabriele Boccaccini, “Determinism,” in  T. & T. Clark Encyclopedia of Second Temple Judaism, ed. Daniel M. Gurtner and Loren T. Stuckenbruck (London: T. & T. Clark, 2020) 2:201–02.

[2] William Whiston, tr. The Works of Josephus: Complete and Unabridged (Peabody: Hendrickson, 1987), 346.

Image 1: hand puppet snowman via pixabay.com; Image 2: painting creativity cloud girl via pixabay.com

About B. J. Oropeza
B. J. Oropeza is a professor of Biblical and Religious Studies as Azusa Pacific University, whose many publications include the subjects of Paul and his letters, Pauline theology, apostasy and perseverance, and intertextuality. You can read more about the author here.

Browse Our Archives



TRENDING AT PATHEOS General Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

23 responses to “Divine Determinism and Human Freedom: The Romans 9 Debate”

  1. As I understand it the usual way of squaring the circle is by understanding God to arrange things in accordance with how he foresees our free choices will go. In Exodus, the Hebrew phrase to “harden the heart” means no more than to decide to be stubborn, since the heart in Hebrew thought is equivalent to the “mind” in ours. In Exodus, “Pharaoh hardened his heart”, “Pharaoh’s heart was hardened” and “God hardened Pharaoh’s heart” are treated as synonymous. God knows that God sending Moses to ask Pharaoh to let the Israelites go will only make Pharaoh stubborn, so God plans accordingly, using Pharaoh’s stubbornness to achieve God’s purpose.
    The point of Romans 9 seems to be nothing about sin or punishment and everything about God raising people up and ordering things for his own purposes to save all – the question about resisting God’s will in 9:19 isn’t (in the original Greek at least, if not in many translations) in fact asking who can resist God’s will, but who actually is. Paul’s point is that Israel’s stubbornness and all that has befallen and is befalling them is not about merit or punishment or anything of that sort but all part of the plan to save not just Israel but the whole world.

  2. while you are on the subject, how many leprechauns can dance on the top of a rainbow?

  3. The Biblical Jews had no sense of a secondary cause. On a very rainy day, God “caused” a boulder to slide down hill and crush a traveler. We would say the real cause was the rain. And so God “hardened” Pharoah’s heart. I real a prominent Jewish theologian who noted that, even today, Jews do not quite trust a capricious God. Old ideas die hard.

  4. The term “Choice” in its NORMATIVE sense entails a condition in which at minimum two options [A] and [NOT A] exist, both of which must exist and be available for a human to select from.

    Theological Determinism rules out such a condition. Options [A] and [NOT A] cannot be both RENDERED-CERTAIN because they are self-canceling. If they were both RENDERED-CERTAIN the result would be nothing.

    Only one option can be RENDERED-CERTAIN. Therefore in Theological Determinism (aka Calvinism) the NORMATIVE sense in which “Choice” is understood is ruled out. It does not exist for humans.

    What does exist is an “inclination” which is RENDERED-CERTAIN not by the human, but by a mind external to the human. And that “inclination” is made to come to pass infallibly and thus irresistibly.

    So in Calvinism there is no such thing as a human being granted the option of choice. The function of choice is reserved solely and exclusively for the THEOS as the expression of divine sovereignty.

  5. 1. foreknowledge is not predestination
    2. Pharaoh hard Pharaoh’s own heart by rejecting light
    3. God chose Jacob to be Israel not Esau because he had foreknowledge of the two
    4. because God is Sovereign doesnt mean He cant set a boundary of free-will He Himself wont cross
    5. the Bible also tells us that the Potter can destroy a vessel once fitted to Himself, and remold a pot once fitted for destruction
    6. and finally, you really believe in a loving God, who CHOOSES the wicked in advance, through NO choice of their own, then puts them in an eternal bonfire simply for the privilege of being CHOSEN by God to malfunction, friend, that God would be immoral, and we know God is not, so God isnt at fault, its your messed up TULIP theology

  6. I understand this is a controversial topic, and discussions on the board might get a little bit passionate. All I ask is that you please be respectful of other people’s viewpoints, even if you happen to disagree with them. Thanks!

  7. I just could not depart your site before suggesting that I extremely loved the standard information a person provide to your visitors? Is gonna be back often in order to check up on new posts.

  8. Wow, incredible blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make running a blog look easy. The overall glance of your web site is excellent, let alone the content material!

  9. Каждая контора, входящая в топ-10 самых надежных букмекеров, славится широкой линией. В нынешних реалиях пленительный показатель – несколько десятков видов спорта в перечне. Причем, дополнительные баллы получили БК, предлагающие заключить пари для «экзотические» ради наших игроков дисциплины: примем, флорбол, американский футбол, хёрлинг и прочее.

    Табель матча также имеет огромное значение. Лидеры рейтинга лучших букмекерских контор предлагают клиентам великое богатство вариантов для ставок. На топовые поединки они могут установить свыше тысячи рынков. Эксперты Prosports особое уважение уделяют компаниям, включающим в проект уникальные маркеты. Непременно, их вы найдете для верхних позициях нашего «хит-парада».

    бк зенит новый доступ

    Благоустройство Busy
    Лайв – это структура, при котором игроки могут итак пари применительно ходу матча. Этот размер ставок лучшие букмекерские конторы ставят во главу угла. Он востребован игроками, спроста словно после начала встречи проще предсказать ее результат. Видно события в лайве компании загодя анонсируют, выделяют их в отдельную линию.

    Исключая того, лучшие букмекеры следят следовательно двумя важнейшими аспектами лайв-ставок:

    оперативности оформления сделки (чтобы режим успела заслуга 1-2 секунды принять пари заранее очередного изменения коэффициента).
    организации видеотрансляции игр ради официальном сайте (просмотр матча позволяет пользователю точнее спрогнозировать дальнейшее развитие ситуации для площадке).

  10. Рейтинг букмекерских контор очень важная предмет, самостоятельно будто он помогает оценить работу компании учитывая всетаки факторы. Играя в букмекерской конторе, мы используем не виртуальные, а кровно заработанные реальные деньги, следовательно чтобы не проиграть их и не остаться с пустыми карманами, важно лучший, ради какие критерии крутить внимание. Первое, ради который стоит обратить благоговение – топ 10 букмекерских контор и наличие положительных и отрицательных отзывов. Наличие высокого рейтинга и лучшей репутации разительно важная предмет, беспричинно или она непосредственно характеризует отношения компании к своим клиентам. Сей посредник ужасно важен воеже новичков, потому сколько они не имеют большого опыта и нуждаются во всесторонней поддержке.

    тенниси какие бонусы при регистрации

    Наличие низкого рейтинга надо благоговейно красной тряпкой и останавливать через перехода для такой сайт. Второе, ради сколь стоит обратить забота – медийность и дата создания компании. Эти два фактора стоит осматривать в совокупности, основания как постоянное доход рекламы букмекерской конторы может говорить не относительный ее известности, а о больших затратах на рекламу. Проверенная букмекерская контора привлекает своих пользователей тем, который она уже не первенствующий год на рынке, что свидетельствует о надежности и финансовой стабильности. Чаще только хорошие компании используют соблазн возможности для поддержки спортивных соревнований, ясно наличие логотипа БК на форме любимого клуба, говорит о правильном выборе. Стоит отметить, что новые компании не навеки являются плохими, в этом случае нуждаться подробно выучить официозный сайт и обзоры. Третий и настоящий главный посредник – лицензия. Изучая страницы сайта букмекерской конторы непременно ознакомьтесь с разделом юридическая информация. В этом разделе должна крыться указана информация о лицензирующем органе и номере лицензии. Выключая этого, должна находиться информация, где, будто и гораздо пожаловаться для букмекерскую контору в случае возникновения споров. Стоит отметить, что сайт Букмекер Знаток уже провел эту работу следовать вас, проведя работу согласно сравнению БК и информация о наличие лицензий и надёжности, легальности дозволено найти в разделе Букмекеры. Надежные букмекерские конторы имеют оценку выше 6,5 баллов.

  11. Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your site.
    You have some really good posts and I believe I would be a
    good asset. If you ever want to take some of
    the load off, I’d absolutely love to write some material for
    your blog in exchange for a link back to mine.
    Please blast me an e-mail if interested. Thanks!
    ps4 https://tinyurl.com/45xtc52b ps4 games

  12. Wow, superb blog layout! How lengthy have you been blogging for? you made running a blog glance easy. The total look of your web site is magnificent, as neatly as the content!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.