A new CDC report: crying wolf?

* Too small to be statistically significant.

Note that the “male rape” figure is understated because being “made to penetrate” (the logistics of which escape me for women) is not counted as rape, when I’d expect that most people would label it exactly that way.

“Sexual coercion” seems to be the category covered by the question asking whether you’ve had sex because your partner was “doing things like telling you lies, making promises about the future they knew were untrue, threatening to end your relationship, or threatening to spread rumors about you” or by “wearing you down by repeatedly asking for sex, or showing they were unhappy.”  “Unwanted sexual contact” ranges from forced sexual kissing to unwanted fondling or forcibly making “you show your sexual body parts.”  And “noncontact unwanted sexual experiences” means things like a man exposing himself or the like.  

As with the college women’s survey, they include “alcohol- or drug-facilitated penetration” as rape, and the question is ambiguous and lends itself to any interpretation from “I was so drunk as to be utterly helpless” to “he should have known better than to have sex with me.”  

The figures here are consistent with the college-rape figure in one respect, though:

Among female victims of completed rape (completed forced penetration and completed alcohol- or drug-facilitated penetration), this form of sexual violence was first experienced by an estimated 78.7% before age 25 years, by an estimated 40.4% before age 18 years (28.3% at ages 11–17 years and 12.1% at age ≤10 years), and by an estimated 38.3% at age 18–24 years. In addition, among female victims of completed rape, an estimated 15.2% first experienced this at age 25–34 years, an estimated 4.6% at age 35–44 years, and an estimated 1.5% at age ≥45 years.

Considering that the study that produced the “1 in 5” figure also produced a (not talked about) “1 in 6” figure — that is, that nearly as many women reported sexual assault before entering college, of a group of mostly traditional college students — this indicates that the issue isn’t college itself, but the risks faced by girls and young women.

However, while the report breaks down rape by age (and ethnic group), it doesn’t say anything about the distribution of survey participants by age, or of responses.  One can easily imagine that older women are much less likely to be willing to talk to a surveyer about such topics — or, on the other hand, that a traditional phone call-based poll would, in general, capture fewer responses from young people.  To the extent that responses are coming from 60-year olds discussing a rape when they were 20, it says nothing about the current situation.  To the extent that responses are coming from 20 year olds, it says nothing about the risks of older women right here, right now.

Oh, and that response rate, in general, is enough to take these statistics with a huge grain of salt, as women who have been victimized are far more likely to respond than those who haven’t.

Bottom line:  I could make a career out of criticizing reports, if someone would pay me.  But in the meantime, reports such as this, with dramatic headline numbers, but, ultimately, a lack of more meaningful conclusions, could do more harm than good.