Idolatry After Idols

Idolatry After Idols May 9, 2018

During the Second Temple period, the Talmud says, “the temptation for idolatry was slaughtered” (quoted in Haberthal and Margalit, Idolatry, 2).

Then the fight returned, with Maimonides. Now, though, idolatry was a contrast-concept to a new conception of God. Halberthal and Margalit summarize: “The central effort of philosophical religion is the attempt to attain a proper metaphysical conception of God. This conception not only is a necessary condition for the worship of God but also constitutes the high point of religious life. Philosophical religion, which attempts to purify the divinity from anthropomorphism, considers the crux of the problem of idolatry to be the problem of error. Idolatry is perceived first and foremost as an improper conception of God in the mind of the worshiper, thereby internalizing the sin” (2).

Philosophical religion turned the war against the idols again “folk religion,” as the battle became a “struggle against imagination, superstition, and the masses’ projection of their own world onto that of God” (3).

Eventually, though, the attack was turned against monotheism itself. During the 18th and 19th centuries, “the entire project of religion is now placed under suspicion of being idolatry, or false worship, since if there can be a kind of worship that is false here can be no guarantee that there is a kind of worship that is not false.”

Thus the Enlightenment directed philosophical theology’s critique of folk religion and anthropomorphism against philosophical theology itself (3).

"I invite you to read a short abstract in English or better to visit my ..."

Can We Trust the Gospels?
"Back to Berkeley, and thence forward again to personalist (Borden Parker) Bowne."

Correlationism and Secondary Qualities
"I wrote a blog post on Patheos about Meillassoux and the speculative realists, but I ..."

Correlationism and Secondary Qualities
"Mike, One of the mistakes that I think we all make is limiting a passage ..."

Chiasm of Five Words

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Rod Bristol

    Jesus Christ, himself, is the only valid image of God, who leads his followers to image God more truly, from “one degree of glory to another.” (2 Cor. 3:18) A temptation of theology is to explain God, which always fails. An explained god is an idol. Folk caricatures of God or of his Christ can take the place of the revealed God, thus becoming idols, which obscure the truth of God. We can say pious, scriptural words while worshipping a projection of ourselves.