2017-09-07T00:05:26+06:00

In certain respects, Continental philosophy has a strong “Protestant” thrust: As Critchley describes it, the philosophical vocation is to produce crisis in a world where the crisis is that there is no recognition of crisis. Through critique of everyday praxis, the philosopher aims to create crisis that will lead to emacipation from current praxis. Every Continental philosopher is a Luther. But, if the earlier post has any value, perhaps it’s better to say that every Continental philosopher is a Borromeo. Read more

2017-09-06T22:51:44+06:00

Continuing through Simon Critchley’s book on Continental philosophy, the following analogy seems to capture some aspects of the contrast of Continental and analytic: Continental is Catholic: conscious of tradition, respectful of saints, aware of historical contextualization. Philosophy is the history of philosophy. Analytic is Protestant: deals with de-contextualized philosophical problems, forgetful of ancestry and saints, philosophical concerns drop from the sky. Philosophy is sharply distinguished from the history of philosophy. This is just an analogy, but I’m suspicious this might... Read more

2017-09-07T00:10:16+06:00

Postmodern critics of modernity sometimes treat the latter not only as the pursuit and ambition for totality; they treat it as a totality, as an undifferentiated whole. But if postmoderns are right, even modernity was fragmented and frayed at the edges, and the appearance of totality is a modernist ruse. A truly postmodern critique of modernity then would have to much more nuanced and differentiated, questioning even the usefulness of the category of modernity. Postmoderns also sometimes treat postmodernism as... Read more

2017-09-07T00:10:16+06:00

A subsidiary thesis: Modernity is motivated by a desire for purity, by dirt-avoidance – dirt being, as Mary Douglas says, “matter out of place.” Counter-modernity is dirt’s revenge, celebration of dirt. Read more

2017-09-07T00:10:16+06:00

Featherstone once again. He points out that sometime in the 18th century, upper class culture divided from lower class culture: “in 1500 the educated strata despised the common people although they shared their culture. Yet by 1800 their descendants had ceased to join spontaneously in popular culture and were rediscovering it as something exotic and interesting” – the carnivalesque popular culture of “folksongs, folktales, devotional images, mystery plays, chapbooks, fairs, and festivals.” Romantics and bohemians reveled in the spectacle of... Read more

2017-09-07T00:02:57+06:00

In his 1987 book, The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism , C. Campbell attempts to explain the origins of contemporary obsession with novelty, pleasure in the new, self-expression through consumption of goods. He traces it to romanticism’s focus on “imagination, fantasy, mysticism, creativity and emotional exploration” (Featherstone’s summary). Campbell himself says, “The essential activity of consumption is . . . not actual selection, purchase or use of products, but teh imaginative pleasure-seeking to which the product image... Read more

2017-09-06T22:49:25+06:00

A couple of further notes from Featherstone’s very stimulating book. First, citing Pierre Bourdieu, he notes the limits of seeing consumption as an isolated marker of status. The signs “that betray a person’s origins and trajectory through life are manifest in body shape, size, weight, stance, walk, demeanour, tone of voice, style of speaking, sense of bodily ease or discomfort, and so on. Hence culture is incorporated [we might say ‘incarnated’], and it is not just a question of what... Read more

2017-09-07T00:03:30+06:00

Featherstone claims that economics has generally focused on the production rather than the consumption side of things, perhaps because of “the assumption that consumption was unproblematic because it was based upon the concept of rational individuals buying goods to maximize their satisfaction.” Only in the late 19th century was attention given to “conspicuous consumption, the snob effect, and the bandwagon effect.” Perhaps, but perhaps this is just a different form of rationality. After all, conspicuous consumption has the not unwelcome... Read more

2017-09-06T23:36:45+06:00

Cultural elites have, Featherstone suggests, an inherently ambivalent relationship with the market. His argument, if I understand it, goes something like this: Cultural elites want to preserve a monopolization of cultural products. Hence, for instance, peer review of scholarly work; work that hasn’t passed peer review can be dismissed as amateurish, uninformed, not from around here. It needn’t even be read. The (obscure) publisher’s imprint is sufficient to pass judgment. At the same time, cultural elites want to distribute their... Read more

2006-09-12T17:46:33+06:00

McDonald’s provides a helpful glimpse at the complexities surrounding postmodernity. On the one hand, the global reach of McDonald’s seems a perfect illustration of one part of the postmodern situation – the global diffusion of American culture and tastes, the plasticity and airiness of postmodern culture, the breaching of national boundaries. On the other hand, as George Ritzer explains, “McDonaldization” involves “the process by which the principles of the fast-food restaurant are coming to dominate more and more sectors of... Read more


Browse Our Archives