2017-09-07T00:01:14+06:00

Also in the November 7 TLS (belatedly on my desk) is a review of Lukas Erne’s Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist , in which Erne challenges the popularly accepted notion that Shakespeare was writing for viewers rather than readers. He shows that plays were being written for publication in Shakespeare’s time, and were considered equal to other forms of literature for reading purposes. He speculates too that the published plays of Shakespeare are too long to have fit into the “two... Read more

2017-09-07T00:10:18+06:00

A review of Jeffrey Knapp’s Shakespeare’s Tribe in the November 7 TLS begins with the comment that Elizabethan dramatists approached their work with a missionary aim: “Countering the fears of religious commentators who believed acting to be nothing more than hypocrisy, this approach admitted the element of deception in theatre but saw dramatic entertainment as a way of cozening the viewer into religion and morality. It went hand in hand with the idea that communal festivity was beneficial to society,... Read more

2017-09-06T23:45:17+06:00

An interesting summary of the work of Nobel-prize winner J.M. Coetzee in the December 8 issue of The Weekly Standard . The reviewer, Michael Kochin, suggests that Coetzee, who is both an academic critic and a novelist, poses unique challenges to Western intellectuals, whether postmodern multiculturalists or conservative classicists. Kochin summarizes: “Coetzee is a disturbing writer because he excavates the lost possibilities of the Western tradition only to extinguish the hopes that we have wrongly placed in Western high culture.... Read more

2017-09-06T23:44:03+06:00

Were there Humanist iconoclasts? It seems plausible, given the interest in Platonism and Neoplatonism among Humanists. And here’s a quotation from the Humanist Vives: “If that very picture which we are gazing at, is obscene, does that not contaminate our minds, especially if it be subtly and artistically depicted? Not undeservedly did wise men wish to banish from the state such artists together with their pictures.” Zwingli might be another connection point of Humanism and iconoclasm, as might Calvin. That... Read more

2017-09-06T23:45:26+06:00

John Donne on Virginity (from Paradoxes and Problemes ): “I call not that Virginity a vertue, which resideth only in the Bodies integrity . . . But I call that Virginity a vertue which is willing and desirous to yeeld it selfe upon honest and lawfull terms, which just reason requireth; and until then, is kept with a modest chastity of Body and Mind.” Read more

2017-09-07T00:05:14+06:00

A pastoral similitude, in honor of Jonathan Edwards: What to do with a low-burning fire? Sometimes, additional wood will smother the fire. But sometimes additional wood is just what the fire needs to revive. So, when zeal is running at a low ebb, we should not necessarily remove burdens until zeal revives. Sometimes an added burden of ministry is what will bring revival. Read more

2017-09-07T00:09:24+06:00

The November 21 TLS has a review of a biography of Nicolaus Steno (1638-86), a Danish physician, theologian, and convert to Roman Catholicism who was beatified in 1988. The reviewer gives this account of Steno’s contribution to medicine: “Between 1663 and 1665, he discovered the cheek salivary duct, identified female ‘testicles’ as ovaries, developed an accurate model of muscular contraction, settled the nature of the heart (summed up on his aphorism ‘the heart is a muscle’) and even made the... Read more

2017-09-06T23:56:14+06:00

Rupert Sheldrake’s latest book, The Sense of Being Stared At , is full of amusing and entertaining oddities, as Sheldrake continues his assault on reductionistic modern science. At the outset of a treatment of “paranormal” phenomena, Sheldrake points out that such things as telepathy are “para-normal” only if we have already defined “normal” in terms that are compatible with modern science. If our minds are more complex and extended than modern science suggests, then there is no “para” about it... Read more

2003-12-07T15:18:33+06:00

The incarnation is no contradiction of God’s transcendence or sovereignty. Never think of Christmas, the incarnation, in any way as a qualification of God’s sovereignty, His Lordship. We shouldn’t say: Yes, God is sovereign Lord, who does as He pleases; but He is ALSO, in ADDITION, the God who has become incarnate as Jesus of Nazareth. Rather, we should confess that God is Lord precisely BECAUSE He was incarnate as Jesus of Nazareth. The incarnation is the proof of God’s... Read more

2017-09-06T23:44:13+06:00

The incarnation is no contradiction of God’s transcendence or sovereignty. Never think of Christmas, the incarnation, in any way as a qualification of God’s sovereignty, His Lordship. We shouldn’t say: Yes, God is sovereign Lord, who does as He pleases; but He is ALSO, in ADDITION, the God who has become incarnate as Jesus of Nazareth. Rather, we should confess that God is Lord precisely BECAUSE He was incarnate as Jesus of Nazareth. The incarnation is the proof of God’s... Read more

Follow Us!



Browse Our Archives