At several points in Galatians, Paul distinguishes between the Abrahamic promise and the Mosaic Torah. He charges that his opponents want to return to the obsolete Mosaic system by forcing circumcision on Gentiles. Problem is, circumcision was given to Abraham, not Moses. It seems to be a sign of the promise, not an imposition of the law. Surely Paul knows this. So why does he set things up the way he does? Doesn’t he leave himself open to the counter-argument... Read more