2013-01-19T10:08:34+06:00

Lev Shestov ( All Things are Possible , 64) observes that it is a “school axiom” that “logical skepticism refutes itself, since the denial of the possibility of positive knowledge is already an affirmation.” Shestov doesn’t think this works: For starters, “skepticism is not bound to be logical, for it has no desire whatever to gratify that dogma which raises logic to the position of law.” Besides, “where is the philosophical theory which, if carried to its extreme, would not... Read more

2013-01-19T06:31:41+06:00

In the final panel discussion at the LA Theological Conference, Alan Torrance offered this arresting interpretation of Peter’s confession in Matthew 16: Peter rightly confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, and Jesus responds by telling him “flesh and blood did not reveal this to you but My Father” and then changes Peter’s name. Peter’s identity is changed in his recognition of Jesus’ identity. But when Jesus tells the disciples that He goes to Jerusalem to die, Peter rebukes... Read more

2013-01-18T06:45:58+06:00

Some reflections on bodies and the gospel at First Things this morning. Read more

2013-01-17T07:59:42+06:00

Shestov on Socrates: “How painful it is to read Plato’s account of the last conversations of Socrates! The days, even the hours of the old man are numbered, and yet he talks, talks, talks . . . . Crito comes to him in the early morning and tells him that the sacred ships will shortly return to Athens. And at once Socrates is ready to talk, to ague . . . . from all sources we have it, that Socrates... Read more

2013-01-17T07:41:31+06:00

More from Shestov: He finds an allegory of metaphysics in Anderson’s tale of the emperor’s new clothes and the child who declares the king naked. Children are always the obstacle in keeping up the charade about the emperor’s clothes. What’s to be done about the children? Shestov says, “With them the only remedy is the Pythagorean system of upbringing, so glorified by Hegel. Children must keep silent and not raise their voice until they realise that some things may not... Read more

2013-01-17T07:34:54+06:00

Lev Shestov has some very funny critiques of metaphysics in All Things are Possible . In one section, he compares the differences between metaphysics and positivism to styles of painting: “In each there is the same horizon, but the composition and colouring are different. Positivism chooses grey, colorless paint and ordinary composition; metaphysics prefers brilliant colouring and complicated design, and always carries the vision away into the infinite; in which trick it often succeeds, owing to its skill in perspective.... Read more

2013-01-16T17:33:23+06:00

As a Pastor I feel the Lord’s pleasure when I preach His Word. It is a deep joy to be called and commissioed to open the Word of the Triune God for the people of God. For most of us we thought we were opening that Word faithfully and fully. Then by our God’s kind providence we were met by James Jordan and Peter Leithart. Following that God-ordained meeting we were ruined in all the right kind of ways. We... Read more

2013-01-16T10:06:15+06:00

Thomas thinks that grateful repayment of favors should match the sentiment of the giver rather than the deed or thing give. One of the objections is we can’t know what a benefactor is thinking: “We cannot base our actions on the unknown. God alone knows the heart of man. The return of favor, then, cannot be gauged by the spirit behind them” ( ST 106, 5). To this, Thomas replies that “God alone sees the heart a it really is,”... Read more

2013-01-16T09:53:26+06:00

Thomas relies heavily on Aristotle, Cicero, and Seneca in his discussion of gratitude, but at one crucial point he introduces a distinctively Christian theme. Must we thank everyone who does us a beneficium ? Thomas answers with 1 Thessalonians 5:18: In all things give thanks. Ultimately, since God is cause of all things, thanks is due for all things and in all circumstances to God. But that means that benefactors serve God’s purposes, and that in turn means that the... Read more

2013-01-16T09:42:00+06:00

One of the things often missed in critiques of scholasticism is its practical thrust. Questions angels and pinheads don’t capture the real genius of the best of scholasticism. In the hands of a master like Thomas, scholasticism is a mode of pastoral theology. A few illustrations from Thomas’s discussion of gratitude in ST II-II, 106-107. In his ethics, Thomas makes regular allowances for the natural frailties of human beings. How can a pauper show gratitude when he has nothing to... Read more


Browse Our Archives