2017-09-06T23:48:05+06:00

Near the beginning of the Metaphysics , Aristotle notes that “it is owing to their wonder that men both now begin and at first began to philosophize; they wondered originally at the obvious difficulties, then advanced little by little and stated difficulties about greater matters . . . . A man who is puzzled and wonders thinks himself ignorant (whence even the lover of myth is in a sense a lover of Wisdom, for the myth is composed of wonders)... Read more

2017-09-06T22:53:14+06:00

“All men by nature desire to know.  An indication of this is the delight we take in our senses.”  So Aristotle.  Jonathan Lear glosses: “That we take pleasure in the sheer exercise of our sensory faculties is a sign that we do have a desire for knowledge.” Obviously, Aristotle is talking about the pleasures we derive from beautiful landscapes, sunsets, paintings; the ecstasies of listening to a string quartet; the transport of aroma; the sensuality of taste and touch.  ... Read more

2017-09-06T23:46:07+06:00

Frank Smith ( Insult to Intelligence: The Bureaucratic Invasion of Our Classrooms ) says that authors teach children to read: “Not just any authors, but the authors of the stories that children love to read, that children often know by heart before they begin to read the story.  This prior knowledge or strong expectation of how the story will develop is the key to learning to read.” So, begin with eschatology. Read more

2017-09-07T00:00:20+06:00

The Targum on the Song of Songs, deftly translated and annotated by Philip Alexander ( The Targum of Canticles: Translated, With a Critical Introduction, Apparatus, and Notes (Aramaic Bible) ), has its amusing oddities.  The bride in the cleft of the rock in 2:14 is Israel at the Red Sea, hemmed in by Pharaoh behind and the Red Sea to the front, and on the two sides with “deserts full of fiery serpents that bite and kill men with their... Read more

2017-09-07T00:09:29+06:00

In an 1837 exchange on the interpretation of the Song of Songs in The Congregational Magazine , one James Bennett argued that the Song had to be interpreted allegorically because a literal interpretation made the woman sound immodest: “What writer, with the feelings, or the reason, of a man, would begin a poem on his fair one by describing her as courting him?”  This is not a cultural bias, he insisted: “It would be more abhorrent from the secluded, submissive... Read more

2017-09-06T23:50:53+06:00

Stephen D. Moore (in an essay on “The Song of Songs in the History of Sexuality”) notes that the shift from allegorical to literal/sexual interpretations of the Song is connected to shifts in understanding of male love.  Patristic and medieval commentators on the Song easily took the feminine voice of the Song as the voice of their own usually male souls, with results that often leave modern reader queasy.  Moore puts it in a typically provocative form, but the point... Read more

2017-09-06T22:48:38+06:00

Levin again: “Since, for Descartes, the senses are nothing but a source of deception and the body is nothing but perishable matter – that is to say, they are challenges, in both cases, to the power of the ego cogitans , the ego must ‘abandon’ them; the Cartesian ego is a cogito which has dissociated, split off, from its embodiment and taken itself as the object of its ‘love.’ In order to possess absolute certainty and security, Descartes undergoes a... Read more

2017-09-06T23:36:46+06:00

Levin interestingly explores the question of whether human beings are completely determined by history by emphasizing human embodiment.  He plays off of Heidegger, who abandoned the “analytic of Dasein” in his later work because he had come to see it as a continuation of the metaphysical tradition he was trying to escape.  What Heidegger missed was the notion that “the human body [could be] an organ of Being” or the ”primal medium into which this pre-understanding of Being is always first... Read more

2017-09-06T23:44:11+06:00

Merleau-Ponty asks, in Humanism and Terror , “What if it were the very essence of history to impute to us responsibilities which are never entirely ours?” A very Augustinian, covenantal question. Read more

2017-09-07T00:02:14+06:00

False subjectivity has led to nihilism.  To combat the nihilism of modernity, Levin says that we need to challenge the “timeless” Cartesian self by affirming a “self open to changes in itself; a self which changes in response to changes in the world; a self capable of changing the conditions of its world according to need.”  In short, “I am not what I am and I am what I am not.” That last sentence seems to me a fine way... Read more


Browse Our Archives