2017-09-06T22:53:17+06:00

Nicholas of Cusa broke with traditional Aristotelian views of uniform substance and motion.  No two things are ever exactly the same: ”two or more objects cannot be so similar and equal that they could not still be more similar ad infinitum . Consequently, however equal the measured and the measured thing may be, they will always remain different.” Thus, difference is the universal reality of the creation.  ”Wherefore it follows, that, except for God, all positable things differ.” And this in... Read more

2017-09-07T00:04:12+06:00

In his book on the origins of German Romanticism and idealism ( Mystical Sources of German Romantic Philosophy (Pittsburgh Theological Monographs) ), Ernst Benz notes that, in contrast to France where philosophical terminology could be smoothly translated from Latin, German philosophy drew its first philosophical language from mysticism: “The philosophical and theological language, the language of German schools and universities, was the same Latin as in France, since Latin was the European language of theologians and scholars.  No philosophical terminology... Read more

2017-09-06T22:51:56+06:00

As Zizek explains Hegel’s answer to the Anselmian question, it is a political question: “why cannot we conceive a direct passage from In-itself to For-itself, from God as full Substance existing in itself, beyond human history, to the Holy Spirit as spiritual-virtual substance, as the substance that exists only insofar it is ‘kept alive’ by the incessant activity of the individuals? Why not such a direct ‘desalienation,’ by means of which individuals recognize the God qua transcendent substance the ‘reified’... Read more

2017-09-06T23:47:58+06:00

According to Slavoj Zizek, German idealism is characterized by the combination of two insights that appear contradictory: “(1) subject is the power of ‘spontaneous’ (i.e., autonomous, starting-in-itself, irreducible to preceding causality) synthetic activity, the force of unification, of bringing together, linking, the manifold of sensual data we are bombarded with into a unified representations of objects; (2) subject is the power of negativity, of introducing a gap/cut into the given-immediate substantial unity, the power of differentiating, of ‘abstracting,’ of tearing... Read more

2017-09-06T22:51:44+06:00

In his commentary on the Song of Songs, Jenson makes the startling claim that “the Bible’s God is sheer contingency.”  He elaborates: “He is the one who chooses what he chooses because he chooses it; he is the one who is what he is because he is it; and for whom the coincidence of fact and reason is not necessity but freedom.  In consequence, his relation to Israel and the church can only be truly described with such alarming concepts... Read more

2017-09-06T23:46:00+06:00

Milbank again: “thought, as Eckhart also pointed out, is a kind of jullity precisely because (after Augustine) it is intentional.  To think something is kenotic – it is to let that thing be and not to try to be that thing, even not to try to be oneself when thinking oneself.  Hence we can see color only if our eye is colorless, come to know something only if our mind goes blank and receptive.” Read more

2010-01-20T17:57:32+06:00

In a discussion of the divergence of “romantic” and “classical” modes of contemporary theology, Milbank highlights the central role of the Scripture.  More fundamental than reason, or the “rational consideration of the propositions of faith” is “meditation on the liturgy, the eucharist and the scriptures.”  Meditating on the liturgy, we meditate on “all the words which wise men have ever uttered,” but especially on “the words of the Bible which contain the most sublime reasonings of all because they anticipate,... Read more

2017-09-07T00:10:21+06:00

In a discussion of the divergence of “romantic” and “classical” modes of contemporary theology, Milbank highlights the central role of the Scripture.  More fundamental than reason, or the “rational consideration of the propositions of faith” is “meditation on the liturgy, the eucharist and the scriptures.”  Meditating on the liturgy, we meditate on “all the words which wise men have ever uttered,” but especially on “the words of the Bible which contain the most sublime reasonings of all because they anticipate,... Read more

2017-09-07T00:10:59+06:00

At the heart of Milbank’s response to Zizek is the insistence that Christianity is fundamentally paradoxical, but not fundamentally dialectical.  For Milbank, the latter partakes of the ontology of violence that he sniffs out beneath classical, modern, and postmodern systems.  In Zizek’s case, it’s fairly overt, and overtly Hegelian. Milbank argues that the logic of Trinitarian theology is different: “for the most classical Christian perspective, as developed from Gregory of Nyssa through Augustine to Aquinas, the Father in his absolute... Read more

2010-01-20T15:30:30+06:00

In his dialog with Slavoj Zizek (published as The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic? (Short Circuits) ), Milbank cites Meister Eckhart’s suggestion that there is an analogy between the Father/Son relation and the relation of justice to a just man: “if the Father and the Son, justice and the just man, are one and the same in nature, it follows . . . that the just man is equal to, not less than, justice, and similarly with the Son... Read more


Browse Our Archives