2017-09-06T23:44:03+06:00

Thomas writes that “to signify something by words or merely by the construction of images . . . yields nothing but the literal sense” and “poetic images refer to something other than themselves only so as to signify them; and so a signification of that sort goes no way beyond the manner in which the literal sense signifies.” If I understand this, I’m not convinced.  First, because this seems to conflate meaning with signification, which I take to be equivalent... Read more

2017-09-06T23:50:49+06:00

Denys Turner notes that the Song of Songs presented challenges to the “minority” of medieval theologians who argued for a more rigorous grounding of spiritual in literal senses.  For these, the text speaks literally, referring to specific events; and these events, as Thomas says, providentially typify future events. To qualify as a type, though, an event would not only have to have some formal similarity to the fulfillment in Christ, but should participate in the history that leads to Christ.... Read more

2017-09-06T23:44:08+06:00

The distinction of image and likeness has been a common one in the history of theology, East and West, and in the West at least it overlaps with the nature/grace dualism.  Image for Bonventure “denotes a kind of ‘shape,’ that is, a quantitative feature of quality or a qualitative feature of quantity; but a likeness attributes the same quality to different things.”  Image is “agreement in quantity” while likeness is “sharing in quality.”  Image is “something in a natural order”... Read more

2017-09-07T00:09:16+06:00

The announcement of Obama’s Peace Prize was greeted with gasps, but on reflection it makes sense.  Obama is, after all, our first Scandinavian President. Read more

2017-09-06T22:45:45+06:00

Turner corrects a widespread misunderstanding of the Pseudo-Dionysian view of religious language.  For the pseudo-Denys (Turner’s designation), everything comes from God and thus “every creature retains within it a trace of its divine source, every creature in some way reflects, or is in some way an image or ‘similitude’ of, the divine nature from which it flows.” At some point, for the pseudo-Denys, all language fails, but “before anything we say of God fails it leads us some part of... Read more

2017-09-06T22:51:51+06:00

Denys Turner ( Eros and Allegory: Medieval Exegesis of the Song of Songs (Cistercian Studies Series) ) has the best summary I’ve read of the problems the doctrine of creation poses for any form of Platonism. First, Platonism has difficulty explaining how anything can exist other than God: “For the platonising Christian, God is above all else unity, a oneness beyond differentiation.  If anything at all other than God exists, then God’s absolute oneness appears threatened.  For if there is... Read more

2017-09-07T00:02:15+06:00

The folks at First Things published an article of mine on secularization in their “On the Square” space yesterday, September 30. Read more

2017-09-06T23:51:39+06:00

Mike Bull is an graphic designer in the wonderfully named Katoomba, New South Wales, who writes about the Bible. He’s produced a massive “biblical theology of the whole Christ” entitled Totus Christus .  There are a lot of juicy details here, but the overall scheme is to follow the heptamerous chiastic pattern of Creation, Division, Ascension, Testing, Maturity, Conquest, Glorification from Genesis to the end of the Bible.  Some of it feels forced and schematic, but overall it’s a lively... Read more

2017-09-07T00:00:09+06:00

In a 1996 article, Angel Manuel Rodriguez offers a close structural analysis of the day of coverings rite in Leviticus 16. Overall, he finds that the chapter is a chiasm: (more…) Read more

2017-09-06T22:46:40+06:00

Leviticus 23 has five speeches of Yahweh: A. Sabbath, Passover, Unleavened Bread, vv 1-8 B. First Sheaf, Pentecost, Gleaning, vv 9-22 C. Trumpets, vv 23-26 B’. Day of Coverings, vv 26-32 A’. Booths, vv 33-44 Several links in this structure are worth noting. (more…) Read more


Browse Our Archives