2017-09-07T00:00:18+06:00

Tallis contests the post-structuralist notion that all distinctions are linguistic, imported to reality by what we say about them. This, he thinks, oversimplifies a more complex situation. For some realities, the “edges” are determined by language, because those realities depend on classifications that we have brought to the real world. For other things – simple objects for instance – the edges are already there, and we just take note of them. “Spatial and temporal edges are not amenable to being... Read more

2017-09-07T00:02:49+06:00

Tallis is Not Saussure about post-structuralism, but that’s partly because he things posts distort the original structuralism of Saussure. Even if Saussure is correct that there no ideas before language links a sound with a concept, that doesn’t mean that there is no differentiation in the world that wasn’t put there by language. He challenges post-structuralism at a couple of points: (more…) Read more

2017-09-06T23:45:11+06:00

Raymond Tallis ( Not Saussure ) is no friend of post-structuralism, but he recognizes that absent texts shape the reading of present ones: “What seems to be offered to us when we confront a particular work is at least partly determined by the silent presence of other works belonging to the genre to which we assign the one we are actually reading. The wrong ‘mental generic set’ will prevent us from being able to assimilate or even make sense of... Read more

2017-09-06T22:51:59+06:00

Also from Robinson’s essay: Clarence Darrow defended two young men charged with the murder of the child. One he defended by saying he got his ideas from Nietzsche: “Is there any blame attached because somebody took Nietzsche’s philosophy seriously and fashioned his life upon it? . . . Your honor, it is hardly fair to hang a nineteen-year-old body for the philosophy that was taught him at the university.” Darrow’s client was found guilty. Read more

2017-09-06T22:48:32+06:00

In a wonderful opening essay on Darwinism in her book, The Death of Adam , Marilynne Robinson (of Gilead fame) offers a few paragraphs on the Scopes trial: “It requires a little effort . . . to remember that [Bryan’s] attack on Darwinism came from the left , from the side of pacifism and reform. His argument against Darwinism is essentially political . . . . Like Einstein, he associated war with the enthusiasms of the inteligentsia, specifically with the... Read more

2017-09-06T22:48:24+06:00

Another of my lectionary meditations at the Christian Century web site: http://www.theolog.org/blog/2008/06/blogging-toward.html. Read more

2017-09-07T00:02:08+06:00

INTRODUCTION Herod Antipas, the third Herod to appear in Matthew (cf. 2:1-18, 22), is as murderous as the others. He rules a kingdom of death, while Jesus brings life and healing ( 14:13 -15, 34-36). THE TEXT “At that time Herod the tetrarch heard the report about Jesus and said to his servants, ‘This is John the Baptist; he is risen from the dead, and therefore these powers are at work in him.’ For Herod had laid hold of John... Read more

2017-09-06T23:56:31+06:00

Austin Farrer said, “The datings of all these books are like a line of tipsy revellers walking home arm in arm . . . The whole series can lurch five years this way or that without colliding with a solid obstacle.” Read more

2017-09-06T22:53:21+06:00

The people of Nazareth find Jesus too familiar to take seriously. How can this son-of-a-carpenter make these kinds of demands on us? It’s a perennial temptation. The more familiar Jesus becomes, the more we’re apt to blunt the force of His radical demands: The Jesus I know wouldn’t ask me to sell all to gain the kingdom. My Jesus doesn’t ask for a righteousness that surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees. All of us are potential Nazarenes. Read more

2017-09-06T23:45:22+06:00

Jesus’ parables seem to apply neatly to His own ministry. They also seem to apply neatly to the history of Israel. Which is it? No need to choose, of course. It’s fundamental to Matthew’s gospel story that Jesus is the true Israel, reliving Israel’s history. We should expect the shape of Jesus’ story to be the same as the shape of Israel’s. So: Is the parable of the sower about Israel’s resowing in the land, culminating with the fruitful harvest... Read more


Browse Our Archives