2017-09-06T22:49:18+06:00

Johannes Cocceius, a father of biblical theology, would seem to have little in common with Cartesian rationalism. But most of the Cocceians in the latter part of the 17th century were Cartesians. Ernest Bizer (in an article entitled “Reformed Orthodoxy and Cartesianism”) suggests that there was an affinity between the two: “Descartes had claimed the knowledge of the universe for philosophy, but by that very claim had removed revelation from the sphere of reason and had bound knowledge of revelation... Read more

2017-09-06T22:46:43+06:00

Dale Dykema of Covenant Home Curriculum writes: “I have just finished reading Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali Moslem woman converted to Dutch Humanism. Her efforts to expose the violence of Islam, especially its oppression of women is noteworthy. Of particular interest to me was how this woman discovered another way of life. As a young girl, living in Kenya, Ethiopia and other Moslem countries, she was able to teach herself enough English to read all of Jane Austen... Read more

2017-09-06T23:46:10+06:00

The liberal state is a free state, but it’s clear from Spinoza that freedom in a liberal state is limited to unlimited freedom of thought and speech. Action is controlled by the state, including religious action: “God has no special kingdom among men except in so far as He reigns through temporal rulers. Moreover, the rites of religion and outward observances of piety should be in accordance with the public peace and well-being, and should therefore be determined by the... Read more

2017-09-06T22:46:25+06:00

The genealogy is pretty clear: Pietist-leaning Collegiants, with affinities to the Anabaptists of the sixteenth century, influence the theological and political view of Spinoza, leading him to write a treatise where he defends two central Anabaptist/Pietist clams: a) he attacks the tyranny of the letter and b) he argues for a liberal political system in which everyone is free to hold whatever theological opinions he wishes. Spinoza’s Tractatus is one of the earliest treatises on liberal polity, preceding Locke’s Letter... Read more

2017-09-06T22:45:57+06:00

Another from Hatzfeld: “The Saturday after the [President’s] plan crash was the usual choir rehearsal day at the church in Kibungo. We sang hymns in good feeling with our Tutsi compatriots, our voices still blending in chorus. On Sunday morning we returned at the appointed hour for mass; they did not arrive. They had already fled into the bush in fear of reprisals, driving their goats and cows before them. That disappointed us greater, especially on a Sunday. Anger hustled... Read more

2017-09-06T22:45:57+06:00

In his harrowing book on the Rwandan killers of 1994, Jean Hatzfeld quotes one young man: “Suddenly Hutus of every kind were patriotic brothers without any partisan discord. We were through playing around with political words. We were no longer in our each-to-his-won mood. We were doing a job to order. We were lining up behind everyone’s enthusiasm. We gathered into teams on the soccer field and went out hunting as kindred spirits.” Read more

2017-09-06T23:41:26+06:00

According to Emmanuel Kolini and Peter Holmes ( Christ Walks Where Evil Reigned ), the Hutus and Tutsis of Rwanda were originally ethnically indistinguishable. Prior to colonialization, the difference was “vocational,” social and economic. Tutsis were cattle herders, Hutus farmers; Tutsis were Abel, Hutus Cain. When the Belgians took over, they gave each Rwandan an ID card that listed ethnicity as Hutu or Tutsi, “based in part on the measurement of their noses.” What was a social division within a... Read more

2017-09-06T23:51:32+06:00

Stanley Kurtz of the EPPC has a lengthy essay review of Philip Carl Salzman’s Culture and Conflict in the Middle East (Humanity Press) in the April 14 issue of The Weekly Standard . The book comes with the endorsement of Daniel Pipes, who calls it “one of the handful of most important books I’ve read during nearly four decades of studying the Middle East” – which is high praise indeed. Kurtz calls the book “a major event: the most penetrating,... Read more

2017-09-07T00:01:26+06:00

INTRODUCTION In the early chapters of Matthew, Jesus is shown as the new Moses and the new Israel. The focus is shifting in chapter 12. Jesus is the “son of David” (v. 23), a warrior confronting Satan’s kingdom, and greater than Solomon (v. 42). In the following chapter, He takes the role of Solomon in teaching about the kingdom of God in parables. THE TEXT “ Then some of the scribes and Pharisees answered, saying, ‘Teacher, we want to see... Read more

2017-09-06T23:36:59+06:00

Matthew 12:33 Either make the tree good, and its fruit good; or make the tree bad, and its fruit bad, for the tree is known by its fruit. Jesus is rebuking the Pharisees here for being bad trees and producing bad fruit. Their bad fruit is primarily their words – their blasphemy against the Son of Man, the poison that comes from their mouths. They are serpent’s children, and they speak like the serpent, lying and poisoning with their words.... Read more


Browse Our Archives