2017-09-06T23:36:46+06:00

Solomon says that emotions are judgments that, like many judgments, are not necessarily deliberative, articulated, or reflective. If so, why do we feel that emotions “come on” us? Solomon explains that it’s because we focus “on the feelings and flushings that typically accompany our emotional upheavals in times of crisis.” He calls this a “strategic confusion of cause and effect” that reduces to “a vehicle of irresponsibility, a way of absolving oneself from blame for those fits of sensitivity and... Read more

2017-09-06T23:36:46+06:00

Robert Solomon notes the familiar experience of emotions that intensify ” as we express them,” adding that this requires explanation “since Freudian theory and most psychological theories since seem to think that emotions are ‘ventilated’ through expression and intensified through suppression.” Is this perhaps another sign of the overwhelming impact of courtly notions of love on the Western soul? Is psychology perhaps just a latter-day theory of courtly love, dressed in scientific garb? Read more

2007-12-29T07:51:53+06:00

In the London Telegraph, Christopher Hitchens sums up the life of Benazir Bhutto, calling attention to her impressive courage. But Hitchens also notes that the courage had a touch of fanaticism that leaves a dangerous legacy. He recalls that during her terms as Prime Minister she pursued a pro-Taliban policy: “It is grotesque, of course, that the murder should have occurred in Rawalpindi, the garrison town of the Pakistani military elite and the site of Flashman’s Hotel. “It is as... Read more

2017-09-06T22:47:55+06:00

In the London Telegraph, Christopher Hitchens sums up the life of Benazir Bhutto, calling attention to her impressive courage. But Hitchens also notes that the courage had a touch of fanaticism that leaves a dangerous legacy. He recalls that during her terms as Prime Minister she pursued a pro-Taliban policy: “It is grotesque, of course, that the murder should have occurred in Rawalpindi, the garrison town of the Pakistani military elite and the site of Flashman’s Hotel. “It is as... Read more

2007-12-28T15:49:16+06:00

In the words of the CBQ reviewer of his book, Terry Griffith “opts for a minority position, though he does so with a growing number of authors (see now a work not yet known to G., Hansjorg Schmid, Gegner im 1. Johannesbrief: Zu Konstruktion und Selbstreferenz im johanneischen Sinnsystem [BWANT 159; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2002]), contending that the bone of contention is the messiahship of Jesus, and the opponents are former Jewish Christians who did not want to take the next... Read more

2017-09-06T23:45:27+06:00

In the words of the CBQ reviewer of his book, Terry Griffith “opts for a minority position, though he does so with a growing number of authors (see now a work not yet known to G., Hansjorg Schmid, Gegner im 1. Johannesbrief: Zu Konstruktion und Selbstreferenz im johanneischen Sinnsystem [BWANT 159; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2002]), contending that the bone of contention is the messiahship of Jesus, and the opponents are former Jewish Christians who did not want to take the next... Read more

2017-09-06T23:45:26+06:00

Griffith suggests that John writes a pastoral rather than a polemical letter, one designed to shore up the identity of his church and prevent further apostasy. John achieves this by insisting on faithfulness in the confession of Jesus as Messiah, by an exhortation to communal love, and by a warning to avoid idols. Like many ancient letters, John ends with a summary of his main themes, including the exhortation to avoid idols. For Jews and early Christians, Griffith says, “idolatry”... Read more

2017-09-06T23:44:07+06:00

Terry Griffith argues in his Keep Yourselves from Idols that the odd closing exhortation of 1 John (“little children, guard yourselves from idols”) holds the key to the book as a whole. He also argues that the “Jewish matrix of Johannine tradition has been significantly underplayed.” For the last couple of centuries, 1 John has been read as a response to doceticizing or gnosticizing movements within the early, with the specifics of the debate being filled out by reference to... Read more

2017-09-07T00:00:10+06:00

Malcolm Coombes (http://www.bct.edu.au/Arche/Coombes.pdf) notes that John clusters words together, often in threes, throughout his first epistle. “Teach,” for instance, occurs only three times in the letter, all in 1 John 2:26-27. John uses “devil” “only four times: three times in the subunit 3:7–8 and once in the adjacent subunit 3:9–10. Similarly the adjective [ alethinos ] (‘true’) is used only four times in 1 John, three of which are used repetitively in subunit 5:20–21. The use of three forms of... Read more

2017-09-07T00:00:10+06:00

In a 1956 JBL article on John’s gospel, one Pierson Parker makes the intriguing statement that 1 John makes almost as much sense read backward as it does read forward. This is evidence that the letter’s contents are “disconnected” and that the letter reads like “an old man’s anxious exhortations to his flock.” Perhaps it’s evidence of something else, not an old man’s anxiety, but his cunning, his deliberate construction of a letter that reads forwards, backwards, and from the... Read more


Browse Our Archives