2017-09-06T23:51:40+06:00

Hamann address his first dedication to his Socratic Memorabilia “To the Public, or, Nobody, the Well-Known.” The dedication begins with a concatenation of biblical polemics against idols: “You bear a name and need no proof of your existence, you find faith and do no miracles to earn it, you get honor and have neither concept nor feeling thereof. We know that there is no idol in the world. Neither are you human, yet you must be a human image which... Read more

2007-10-26T18:02:19+06:00

Hamann’s style was as critical to his protest against Kant and the Encyclopedists as the content of his opaque essays. As Kenneth Haynes points out in the introduction to the recent Cambridge volume of Hamann’s writings, “The style he cultivated was the opposite of that of the Encyclopedie , obscure rather than perspicuous, personal and even private rather than disembodied and anonymous, erudite and sometimes obscene rather than polite and complacent.” In short, “The style was a reproach to the... Read more

2017-09-06T23:43:25+06:00

Hamann’s style was as critical to his protest against Kant and the Encyclopedists as the content of his opaque essays. As Kenneth Haynes points out in the introduction to the recent Cambridge volume of Hamann’s writings, “The style he cultivated was the opposite of that of the Encyclopedie , obscure rather than perspicuous, personal and even private rather than disembodied and anonymous, erudite and sometimes obscene rather than polite and complacent.” In short, “The style was a reproach to the... Read more

2017-09-06T22:49:18+06:00

SR Hirsch has some characteristically stimulating comments about the description of the ark of the covenant in Exodus 25. 1) He points out that the phrasing at the beginning of the ark section (25:10) is different from the opening syntax for the other furnishings of the tabernacle. Instead of addressing Israel in the third person, Yahweh speaks in the third person: “they shall make.” This is the same phrasing as verse 8, which says “they shall make for me a... Read more

2017-09-06T23:51:31+06:00

For Aquinas, the ideal situation of justice is a situation of equality. Only when the persons acting toward each other are equal is there “justice without qualification.” For an act to be an act of justice per se , it’s necessary that the persons be “absolutely other” and “absolutely distinct,” which is to say that the persons are not defined in terms of each other. (more…) Read more

2017-09-07T00:10:15+06:00

Richard Bauckham has written two books on Moltmann, and he summarizes his findings in a general article on Moltmann in David Ford, ed., The Modern Theologians . He first traces the development of Moltmann’s work, from the early trilogy (Theology of Hope, The Crucified God, The Church in the Power of the Spirit) to the five volumes that Moltmann describes as “contributions” to theology (rather than a “dogmatics”). At the center of his early work is a dialectical understanding of... Read more

2017-09-07T00:10:15+06:00

In his book on the Trinity, Veli-Matti Karkkainen gives a superb detailed summary of Moltmann, and offers some pointed, even devastating, criticisms. Moltmann puts the cross as the center of his understanding of God: “the cross of the Son stands from eternity in the centre of the Trinity.” Another guiding assumption is “future as the essence of [God’s] being,” a concept Moltmann borrowed from the Marxist philosophy Ernst Bloch, whose philosophy of hope influenced Moltmann’s work on eschatology. God identifies... Read more

2017-09-06T23:44:12+06:00

One of the main critics of contemporary interpretations of Augustine has been Michel Rene Barnes of Marquette. He summarizes the case against Augustine, and the fundamental problems with that case, in a 1995 article from Theological Studies. I am also drawing on the discussion of Lewis Ayres’s recent Nicaea and Its Legacy . There is, he says, “a consensus among systematicians on the existence and character of an early ‘economic’ understanding of God,” which “has led, among other things, to... Read more

2007-10-22T15:41:46+06:00

Uriah Y Kim reviews my Kings commentary in a recent issue of Reviews in Religion and Theology . He’s got some criticisms, but overall it’s a fair review. A couple of responses on specific points: 1) He thinks my contention that there is a “seventh-king” pattern is suspect; my counting is off: “If the line of Judean kings starts with Solomon, then Ahaziah is the seventh king; however, if the sequence starts with David or even Saul, then Ahaziah is... Read more

2017-09-06T22:45:46+06:00

Uriah Y Kim reviews my Kings commentary in a recent issue of Reviews in Religion and Theology . He’s got some criticisms, but overall it’s a fair review. A couple of responses on specific points: 1) He thinks my contention that there is a “seventh-king” pattern is suspect; my counting is off: “If the line of Judean kings starts with Solomon, then Ahaziah is the seventh king; however, if the sequence starts with David or even Saul, then Ahaziah is... Read more


Browse Our Archives