2017-09-06T22:45:56+06:00

Hamann: “The connection and agreement of concepts is precisely the same in a demonstration as the relation and sympathy of numbers and lines, sounds and colours are in a musical composition or painting.” Read more

2017-09-06T22:49:10+06:00

As noted in a post earlier his week, Barth sees Kant’s philosophical program as an opening for the biblical theologian to do his own thing on his own basis by his own methods, without paying much of any attention to reason. Milbank wonders if this doesn’t leave a “certain liberal residue, a certain humanistic deposit.” For Barth, it is possible to “recognize certain features of the created order – whether ontological or epistemological – in their pure finitude, without reference... Read more

2017-09-06T22:49:08+06:00

Milbank closes a superb article on the “radical pietists” (Hamann and Jacobi) with this paragraph: “Because [the radical pietists] point theology to a radical orthodoxy they also show how theology can outwit nihilism. Not by seeking to reinstate reason, as many opponents of postmodernity would argue. This is absurd, because nihilism is not scepticism, nor relativism. No, as Hamann and Jacobi understood, the rational Enlightenment already in effect taught nihilism. For nihilism is the purest objectivity, since it is possible... Read more

2017-09-06T22:45:50+06:00

Kant viewed Judaism as a narrow, particular, hostile political entity. The fact that God promised that He would bless the nations through Abraham seems not to have registered with Kant. Kant’s treatment of Judaism has central importance in his construction of modern, Enlightened religion. And in this context, recent work that rehabilitates the universal promise of Judaism (such as in the New Perspective) is not only important for its contribution to biblical scholarship but for its wider theological and cultural... Read more

2007-09-12T10:41:08+06:00

Postmodernism is rigorous disbelief in eschatology, in final judgment. And this arises from and is a reaction to Kant, who (as Hamann recognized) believed he had somehow arrived at the eschaton ahead of schedule and spend his life sending back reports. Read more

2017-09-06T23:45:59+06:00

Postmodernism is rigorous disbelief in eschatology, in final judgment. And this arises from and is a reaction to Kant, who (as Hamann recognized) believed he had somehow arrived at the eschaton ahead of schedule and spend his life sending back reports. Read more

2017-09-06T22:47:49+06:00

Barth’s includes an extensive treatment of Kant in his history of 19th century Protestant theology. According to Barth, Kant represents the 18th-century’s coming to self-consciousness. He saw both the possibilities and the limits of the Enlightenment’s obsessions with reason. He announces that his age is the age of criticism, but in Kant this criticism turns against itself. Kant does not critique certain propositions, but turns the critical apparatus of enlightenment on knowledge per se. The civilization achieved by the 18th... Read more

2007-09-10T22:09:46+06:00

Nicholas Wolterstorff analyzes the “conundrum” of atonement in Kant’s treatment of rational religion. We need to be forgiven for the evil we’ve done, and we are incapable of doing this ourselves. God has to do it. Yet, Kant assumes a radical form of autonomy, which makes our moral value depend completely on our free actions. Kant uses the language of grace, but his assumption about human freedom turns grace into justice: God forgives those who have made themselves worthy of... Read more

2017-09-06T23:45:59+06:00

Nicholas Wolterstorff analyzes the “conundrum” of atonement in Kant’s treatment of rational religion. We need to be forgiven for the evil we’ve done, and we are incapable of doing this ourselves. God has to do it. Yet, Kant assumes a radical form of autonomy, which makes our moral value depend completely on our free actions. Kant uses the language of grace, but his assumption about human freedom turns grace into justice: God forgives those who have made themselves worthy of... Read more

2017-09-06T23:45:59+06:00

Kant’s Book 4 is on “counterfeit service” or “religion and priestcraft.” In this book, Kant launches a critique of cultic religion. He is not condemning cult and ritual per se, but says that it must not be construed as divine service. The statutory laws that govern religious cult, and the officials that direct the cult, are defensible “provided that these officials direct their teaching and order to that final end (a public religious faith).” Kant begins with a distinction between... Read more


Browse Our Archives