In Defense of ‘Arrogant Atheism’

In Defense of ‘Arrogant Atheism’ January 20, 2014

Atheists are often accused of being arrogant, angry, and intolerant. Often these accusations are little more than ad hominem attacks meant to silence criticism that threatens cherished religious superstitions.

However, when a respected member of the atheist community calls for “An End to Arrogant Atheism,” the merits of arrogance in service to the cause of atheism becomes worthy of examination.

In a recent article for Huffington Post, Roy Speckhardt, Executive Director of the American Humanist Association, calls for “An End to Arrogant Atheism.” Speckhardt worries that arrogant atheism “is likely to leave religious people offended by, instead of interested in atheism and rational thinking.”

Claiming to be making “an argument about tactics and attitude” Speckhardt writes:

The problem with arrogant atheism is that it scares away those who would otherwise self-identify as atheists, and it prevents us from building the alliances we need in order to achieve our aims.

Speckhardt laments:

What’s often holding us back is “arrogant atheism,” which is seen when atheists speak as if their view is infallible, and act as if their unwavering non-belief makes them superior to those who do believe.

Speckhardt is right: the so called “arrogant atheism” exhibited by Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and others often alienates and offends the religious sensibilities of many. Further, it is often the case that some who may otherwise be sympathetic to the cause of atheism, and the secular values that many atheists promote, are offended by “arrogant atheism.”

Yet what Speckhardt misses, is that many confirmed atheists hunger for the so-called “arrogant atheism” Speckhardt argues against. Indeed, confirmed atheists need and deserve to hear the unvarnished truth, and that truth often comes across as “arrogant.” Atheists are only human, and like all humans, they want their thoughts and feelings represented in the conversation.

By protecting the religious feelings of others, we risk denigrating the lived experience of atheists and other freethinkers, and, perhaps more importantly, denigrating the values of truth and honesty. Speckhardt chastises Richard Dawkins for pointing out that  “religion is an organized license to be acceptably stupid,” and that “the combined number of Nobel Prizes won by Muslims was less than that won by a single English university.” Yet Speckhardt admits that both points are valid. Speckhardt does not challenge the truth of Dawkins’ claims, rather, his concern seems to be that such claims, while truthful, are impolite.

Ultimately, not every utterance in the service of atheism need be an attempt to convert the fence sitters and those suffering religious delusion. Atheists should feel free to speak for and to each other, without worry as to the feelings of the faithful. Atheists should not apologize for speaking their truth, even if that truth offends the feelings of the faithful and their allies.

Speckhardt is right to be concerned about tactics and attitudes when it comes to the promotion of atheism and the secular humanist values many atheists share. Speckhardt is wrestling with a dilemma all thoughtful atheists, agnostics and other freethinkers face. The sad fact is that many of those closest to us suffer and labor under religious delusion. To challenge their superstition with the cold light of reason is often seen to be hostile, arrogant, intolerant and insensitive.   As the philosopher Daniel Dennett explains:

There is no polite way to suggest to someone that they have devoted their life to a folly.

"Oh, why not. We're in the twilight zone already."

My Pillow Guy Delivers Religious Rant ..."
"But should they put him in solitary, or jam him into some poorly maintained cage ..."

Florida Megachurch Pastor Arrested After Violating ..."
"Would this be reckless endangerment, assault, or some degree of attempted murder?"

Florida Megachurch Pastor Arrested After Violating ..."
"It’s quite obvious why Pillow Guy was there. He all but dropped his drawers and ..."

My Pillow Guy Delivers Religious Rant ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • bamcintyre

    I get so tired of fundamentalists declaring that I am argumentative and rude when I refuse to buy into their fantasy and folly. I’m supposed to honor their religion, but they have no problem belittling my belief in reality and honor to all. (Yeah, then they tell me I must actually be christian if I hold those views, and I tell them they must not be christian because they don’t live those views.)

    • aldrisang .

      Whatcha mean by “supposed to honor their religion”?

  • aldrisang .

    Atheists come in all flavors, just like Christians. No matter how much we may want to divorce ourselves from certain sub-groups within the whole (if only in the public perception), they’ll always be a part of the picture. I’m sure many liberal Christians really want the right-wing fundies to drop dead or shut up, but they won’t have any more luck.

    Personally I think anything higher than a “6” on the Dawkins Belief Scale is pushing it a bit, but at least they are basing their counter-claim (that God/gods positively don’t exist) on sound scientific reasoning and evidence (or lack thereof), so it’s not unreasonable. Besides, “arrogance” based on empiricism and the scientific method is much less obnoxious than arrogance based on faith.

  • Cynic

    “…often alienates and offends the religious sensibilities of many…” – GOOD! It’s high time they WERE offended, justifiably, in the name of logic, reason, and REALITY.

  • Paulstuart Nachbar

    often i think nearly everything human is and always has been a folly, whether or not it results in the development of new cultures of art and science and math various conclusions about the world and logic based on logical or seemingly logical scientific and mathematical and historical arguments of some kind or the more usual life of working too many hours for too little money at generally less than perfect or very well rewarded jobs in order to be able to eat and pay the rent get married perhaps and maybe even have kids with somebody remotely compatible without too many tragedies.(what the average middle of the road iqwise middle class everywhere calls ‘responsiblity ‘ and ‘reality’ but then we as a species often like to argue on amateur or professional levels. If this were not so there would be many fewer jobs whether paid for by spiritually oriented sources and or employers or atheistically oriented sources and employers. both in compeittion for the consumer dollar.with all that that brings. Whoever accumulates what over whatever length of time I’m sure the worms. below would consider everything we do a folly , that is, how seriously we take all such matters. but then they have their jobs too “processing” us. and Im glad i cant interpret whatever remarks they might make critical or humorous upon their greetings or our receptions

  • cat

    Contrary to what Dennett writes, the Socratic method when applied correctly leads superstitious people to realize their own folly.

  • By protecting the religious feelings of others, we risk denigrating the lived experience of atheists and other freethinkers, and, perhaps more importantly, denigrating the values of truth and honesty.

    I used to work with a guy who was infamous for being incredibly insensitive and critical of others. When anyone objected, he’d say, “Whaddya want me to do? Lie?”

    Is that really the course of action you recommend?