Emergency! Can Faithers and Freethinkers Respond Together?

Emergency! Can Faithers and Freethinkers Respond Together? March 18, 2019

Editor’s Note: Talk about timely!  This post was sent to me unsolicited and just BEFORE the horrible mosque shootings in New Zealand.  Too often these days, we find ourselves preparing for devastating emergency situations, realizing the need to plan how to cooperate with people of different religious perspectives.  What keeps us from responding just as humans? Here are some unfortunately timely examples of how it’s possible to work together, irrespective of religion, when something bad is happening. Hopefully this kind of response can be applied on a broad scale.  /Linda LaScola, Editor

=========================

By Chris Highland

No doubt we disbelievers are as overwhelmed by the incessant calamities and catastrophes as many in the faith community. Faced with this ceaseless stream of real or imagined crises, it may be an appropriate time to take a deep breath and open our eyes and minds wide to consider how an emergency can be addressed in a reasonable, cooperative manner on a local level.

While completing a book on my emergence from faith (Life After Faith)—never an actual crisis for me—and compiling stories from my years as a chaplain in My Address is a River, I was asked to become the director of an emergency winter shelter. This would be the first “rotating shelter” in the county, moving from place to place, sanctuary to sanctuary each week.

This was a whole new way of community involvement for me. After nearly twenty-five years as an interfaith chaplain with the last ten years as leader of a street chaplaincy, I was used to walking straight into personal crises while addressing the Big Picture issues of mental health, criminal justice and homelessness/housing. My work brought me in touch with people who were in daily emergency, women and men I never imagined I’d get to know and care about so much. From prisoners in maximum security to survivors camped high on wooded hillsides, from hospitals to shelters and streets, my staff and I were on the front lines of “the war on the poor,” as some say.

I helped to build our chaplaincy boards with business leaders, clergy, social workers, congregants and concerned citizens. Some represented specific religious groups and some were simply compassionate people. We didn’t always know what board- members, volunteers or supporters believed. It simply didn’t matter.

Close working relationships grew between us—Catholics and Protestants, Jews and Muslims, Buddhists and Bahai’s, Wiccans and New Agers and a whole lot of — Others. I was regularly taking a walk, talking on the phone or drinking a tea or a beer with a priest or rabbi, minister or witch, preacher or humanist.

We were focused on helping others—period. Debates and disagreements over personal beliefs or non-beliefs were distractions.

Our annual interfaith service the night before Thanksgiving was inclusive of many faiths and those without faith. Yes, we would have prayers, poems, scriptures and hymns but the highlight of the evening was always the presence and participation of the street community. Their words, stories, songs made it real and deeply meaningful.

Held in a church sanctuary, the actual sanctuary became the people, with homes and without. With beliefs and without.

The dozens of memorial circles and processions we held were also radically inclusive, modeling the way true “community” could be more than defended tribes, where people matter more than philosophies or politics.

I became convinced, because I saw it every day for nearly thirty years, that people from vastly different backgrounds and beliefs, diverse ethnicities, economics or orientations not only could get along and work side by side, but they actually did, usually quite effectively. Not to say it was ever easy, that it wasn’t often a little chaotic and messy. Walking into the tensions of our communities is no walk in the park—though we walked, sat and held gatherings in parks all the time!

Having left my ordination in 2001, I continued with the chaplaincy for another four years before moving to a small cabin on an island in the Northwest where I did trail and farm work, wrote a few books and decompressed from a personal and vocational life packed with emergencies. Little did I know that upon returning to California I would stumble right back into “it”—the perpetual earthquakes of personal emergencies.

As the director of the shelter I was employed by the county detox program and a Catholic social service agency, overseeing a mobile shelter supported by the county, a community foundation and a coalition of religious congregations yet to be organized.

With my colleagues at the detox center and St. Vincent dePaul, I began to coordinate over a dozen congregations, several non-profits, County Health and Human Services and literally hundreds of volunteers. We hired a great staff of women and men who were either unhoused or had “been there” and knew the precarious life outside.

The central purpose was simple, in a complex kind of way: there is an immediate emergency (people are dying outside in the cold) that demands an immediate response.

The irony was, of course, that a secular humanist (me) was the director!

It was amusing to me even while musing over one evident truth:

An emergency can offer new ways of merging as well as emerging.

I got to work constructing a website to help us communicate and collaborate. I wrote:

“Where is home for me, for you, for us? If I say, “The County is my home” then whatever I dwell in from a castle to a car to a sheet of stained cardboard, is a home or a housing or just a homing—a homing in on something that grounds me and centers me. I am my own address.

We can say, I’ve passed through open doors and been met with kindness. I’ve tasted the deliciousness of life from strangers who did not treat me like a stranger. Will we be strangers again? Will they?”

Each afternoon the staff and I had to “play god” by selecting the 30 men and 20 women a sanctuary could accommodate that night. Almost every day I told the crowd in the free dining room downtown that I hated my job. Not the part about getting to know them and directing the shelter — just the part of having to select who was IN and who was OUT. I said I felt like the captain of a ship deciding who could get in the lifeboat with limited space.

Later I wrote:

“A small, temporary lifeboat…where everyone does their part searching for dry, safe, stable land…. Where hospitality brings us all closer to home.”

In my view, there are many emergencies that wouldn’t be so if people of faith and people without faith were willing to put their bickering beliefs aside and work together. It’s not really so difficult.

==================

Bio: Chris Highland was a minister and chaplain for many years in the SF Bay Area.  Now teaching courses on Freethought in Asheville, North Carolina, he writes a weekly “Highland Views” column for the Citizen-Times. His new book, A Freethinker’s Gospel, is now available from Pisgah Press.  Chris has been a member of The Clergy Project since 2012. To learn more, see www.chighland.com.

>>>>> Photo Credits: By Pass a Method – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=25255735

By passenger of the Carpathia, the ship that received the Titanic’s distress signal and came to rescue the survivors – http://narademo.umiacs.umd.edu/cgi-bin/isadg/viewobject.pl?object=21605https://www.archives.gov/publications/the_record/march_1998/titanic.html, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=704248

By American Humanist Association, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=51390220

 

""So we hear things like ‘uncaused first cause’, or even ‘god has always existed’, and ..."

How Do Theologians Learn to Talk ..."
""God is beyond our knowing" is a dodge when theologians can't explain evil and suffering, ..."

How Do Theologians Learn to Talk ..."
"Their congregations show up to talk to The Man Upstairs, to sing songs to him ..."

How Do Theologians Learn to Talk ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • mason

    “In my view, there are many emergencies that wouldn’t be so if people of faith and people without faith were willing to put their bickering beliefs aside and work together. It’s not really so difficult.”

    First, when you write “people without faith” it carries a seed of the pejorative IMHO. I think it at least needs some specificity such as “people without irrational faith in a deity. As a person without irrational faith in any deity, I have more faith in real things https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ab9d3cf11dd57c171dab1e1d202a091042a92664b1c13c5e9d6ab832be1d7a22.jpg than I ever did as a person of irrational faith in a deity.

    Second, when referring to “people of irrational faith” it would be helpful to make a distinction between liberal Christians and fundamentalist Evangelicals: they’re not even similar theistic faith creatures.

    • Linda_LaScola

      good point re depicting “faith” as a given and exclusively positive attribute. Will think on it.

    • What do you have “faith” in? You seem quite sensitive about that.

  • alwayspuzzled

    Back in the day, nobody said, “Hey, what’s your belief?” It was just, “Thanks for coming. Grab a place in line. The march is about to begin.”

    And I think it is still that way. There is a hell of a lot more atheist/theist conflict in the blogosphere than there is in the real world, when there are real people in need of real help and the real people who actually turn out to help don’t give a damn whether someone is religious or not.

    • Linda_LaScola

      I also suspect there’s a presumption that everyone shares a belief in God.

      • alwayspuzzled

        The only shared belief is that there are people who need help and something needs to be done to help them.

    • ElizabetB.

      ….this may be a luxury the US shares with other Western places, while the reason Gretta Vosper began to identify as “atheist” rather than “non-theist” was in order to identify with atheists being killed in countries like Bangladesh….

      • alwayspuzzled

        I think you are right that there is a lot more tolerance (or indifference) in Western cultures than in many other cultures. Interestingly, Vosper’s congregation didn’t seem to have a problem with it. To amend my original claim, I think in Western cultures the theist and atheist labels are much more important in the blogsphere than they are in real life.

    • Good point. This is where “beyond belief/faith” (and beyond non-belief too) makes the most sense.

  • ElizabetB.

    OK… true confession, as Chris’ question has stayed with me this week…. if I have a choice, I donate to NON-conservative-Christian charities, even when I know some that lean conservative-religious do good work, like World Vision — I even read good MSM reports of Samaritan’s Purse in hell holes around the world. So in answer to Chris’ question I have to confess, “only sometimes.” Even at the local level I discriminate if I have the choice. Thanks for making me think, Chris!

    • I think people of conscience give in any way they can, where they think it does the most good.
      Glad to stir more thought here.