My wife just wrote a review of this movie, so I guess I will too. We only went to see it because some Bishop at the Catholic church urged people not to. Prior to that, I asked my wife if I could pay her not to make me see it. I went into the theater, certain that I couldn’t possibly enjoy this film. It really wasn’t as bad as I thought it was going to be, but it still wasn’t any good.
The movie struck me as sort-of a remake of Pretty Woman, except that it wasn’t even THAT good. I didn’t like pretty woman either, because I don’t connect with the fantasy of a billionaire who buys a penniless woman lavish gifts for two hours until the movie ends. Nor could I consider it ‘erotica’. It’s too disproportionate. He’s young and good-looking, but impossibly rich and powerful at the same time. However she is plain and mousey, with no strength or passionate interests; she didn’t have any charm to her personality, and she frankly doesn’t have a good enough body for an erotic film. Really gorgeous women can be captivating, even with no other attributes, but she just wasn’t that pretty. Speaking personally there was nothing there to pique an interest, especially not the interests of a handsome physically-obsessed corporate tycoon. Not a psychologically healthy one anyway. So it was like watching a predator toying with his prey, except that somehow she was in control of him throughout the whole movie. So there wasn’t really anything to like from either angle.
Yeah, it reminded me of that movie too.
Throwing money at a woman when you have an inexhaustible supply of it is, ironically a cheap fantasy. Otherwise I winced at everything he did wrong, which was almost everything he did. Controlling her through monitoring and following her, creating dependance and being visibly jealous of anything that didn’t directly involve or revolve around him. I know people like that, and I’d rather I didn’t.
Ultimately the movie was not erotic and not fun or funny either. And it’s strange that Catholics would object to it, because, (in a sense) it was the first time for both of them, as improbable as that is. She was still a virgin in college? He had never been photographed with a woman despite owning 15 prior sex slaves? He was indomitable and in command, and their sex was portrayed as an uncomfortable experience resulting from some form of self-loathing. That’s what the Catholic clergy teaches, isn’t it?