An Infidel reads Sūrahs 80, 97, 91, 85, 95 & 106

An Infidel reads Sūrahs 80, 97, 91, 85, 95 & 106 May 1, 2019

If you’ve just found this series, see
my 1st post on Surahs 1 & 2.
my 2nd post on Surahs 96, 68 & 73.
my 3rd post on Surahs 74, 111 & 81.
my 4th post on Surahs 87, 92, 89, 93, 94 & 103.
my 5th post jumping to Surah 18.
my 6th post on Surahs 100, 108, 102, 107, 109 & 105
my 7th post was on Surahs 113, 114, 112 & 53.

As before, we will be reading each sūrah [chapter] in the order of revelation. We were reading The Study Quran, but that link has been taken offline and is no longer available for free. There are some other online translations we can look at. But for my own purposes of copying text, we’ll go back to the version we read at the start of this series, The Qur’an; A new translation by M. A. S. Abdel Haleem. Then, as we did before, we’ll compare that with other translations like Quran.com and cross reference with the tafsirs.

Sūrah 80: “ʿAbasa” (He Frowned)

(1) He frowned and turned away (2) when the blind man came to him–– (3) for all you know, he might have grown in spirit, (4) or taken note of something useful to him. (5) For the self-satisfied one (6) you go out of your way––(7) though you are not to be blamed for his lack of spiritual growth––(8) but from the one who has come to you full of eagerness (9) and awe (10) you allow yourself to be distracted. (11) No indeed! This [Qur’an] is a lesson (12) from which those who wish to be taught should learn, (13) [written] on honoured, (14) exalted, pure pages, (15) by the hands of (16) noble and virtuous scribes.

Note that even this far into the scriptures, they still haven’t taught us anything! I don’t think spiritual growth is possible in any sense, (since there’s no such thing as a spirit) but so far the Qur’an hasn’t even shared any theology; nothing but the constantly repeated message that you’d better believe what you’re told or be damned if you don’t. That’s all.

The translator, Abdel Haleem explains that this passage is in reference to the alleged prophet converting unbelievers, but Muhammad was momentarily distracted and frowned at a blind man. It doesn’t explain why that should even bother a blind man. Then Muhammad was reproached by (I can only assume) the angel, Gabriel.

(17) Woe to man! How ungrateful he is! (18) From what thing does God create him? (19) He creates him from a droplet, He proportions him, (20) He makes the way easy for him, (21) then He causes him to die and be buried. (22) When He wills, He will raise him up again. (23) Yet [unbelieving?] man does not fulfill God’s commands.

It was always my understanding that the religion of Islam likely arose out of a conflict among early Christians, with the losing faction banished to Medina following a disagreement at the Nicene Convention. If that were so, we should expect to see similar views on creation. But this passage shows a very different interpretation than we read in the Bible.

Note, as before, that everything that ever happens, happened because Goddidit. Nothing ever happens for any other reason, not even if you meant to do it yourself. Whatever you did, God meant for you to do that. That’s why you did it. You couldn’t do anything otherwise. So you have no free will.

(24) Let man consider the food he eats! (25) We pour down abundant water (26) and cause the soil to split open. (27) We make grain grow, (28) and vines, fresh vegetation, (29) olive trees, date palms, (30) luscious gardens, (31) fruits, and fodder: (32) all for you and your livestock to enjoy.

Not sure what this is supposed to be about. It sounds like Gabriel is crediting the angels for doing everything God wants done, rather than God blinking, wiggling his nose or snapping his fingers to do his own magic. Turns out he has a team of employees to do all those earthly miracles for him. This reminds me of the story of the fairies in the garden, who live underground and push up the daisies, as if that’s why the flowers look like they’re growing. It amazes me that so many people around the world seem to think like this, at least on some level.

(33) When the Deafening Blast comes––(34) the Day man will flee from his own brother, (35) his mother, his father, (36) his wife, his children: (37) each of them will be absorbed in concerns of their own on that Day– – (38) on that Day some faces will be beaming, (39) laughing, and rejoicing, (40) but some faces will be dust-stained (41) and covered in darkness: (42) those are the disbelievers, the licentious.

We actually read a whole sūrah that didn’t mention damnation for the unbeliever, but we’re back on track now. So imagine any catastrophe, like a flood or tsunami, wherein only some people are in a safe place, and they’re watching their neighbors being washed away. Now imagine what sort of amoral monsters the safe people would have to be for them to laugh and rejoice selfishly even as they know the others are suffering. This is the sort of callous inhumanity that the Abrahamic god actually endorses.

Sūrah 97 “Al-Qadr” (Night of Glory)

(1) We sent it down on the Night of Glory. (2) What will explain to you what that Night of Glory is? (3) The Night of Glory is better than a thousand months; (4) on that night the angels and the Spirit descend again and again with their Lord’s permission on every task; (5) [there is] peace that night until the break of dawn.

Abdel Haleem translates Al-Qadr as “The Night of Glory”. Quran.com calls it “The Power”. Al-Quran.info calls it “The Adornment”. Al-islam.org calls it “the Night of Destiny”. Tathsir Ibn Kathir doesn’t help. He calls this chapter, “The Night of Al-Qadr”. Don’t ask me, Man.  This sūrah doesn’t give me any clear indication of what it’s even talking about. Is this the Muslim version of Rapture, maybe? I’ll have to ask my panel of Muslims and ex-Muslims to explain this to me on video, which I will later add to the bottom of this post.

Sūrah 91 “Al-Shams” (The Sun)

(1) By the sun in its morning brightness (2) and by the moon as it follows it, (3) by the day as it displays the sun’s glory (4) and by the night as it conceals it, (5) by the sky and how He built it (6) and by the earth and how He spread it, (7) by the soul and how He formed it (8) and inspired it [to know] its own rebellion and piety! (9) The one who purifies his soul succeeds (10) and the one who corrupts it fails. (11) In their arrogant cruelty, the people of Thamuda called [their messenger] a liar, (12) when the most wicked man among them rose [against him]. (13) The messenger of God said to them, ‘[Leave] God’s camel to drink,’ (14) but they called him a liar and hamstrung her. Their Lord destroyed them for their crime and levelled them. (15) He did not hesitate to punish them.

So far in this series, I’ve done a pretty good job of understanding the implications of what I’m reading. I know this because I’ve been testing that with a panel of people raised in Islam or who still believe in Islam; who have counseled me on video after each of these blog posts. But there is a lot in the Qur’an that isn’t spelled out clearly in the text alone, things you wouldn’t know about unless you were raised with all the background interpretations. And this is where I will actually need such council because the tafsirs aren’t helping me at all this time around.

All I note here is that the authors of most of the supposedly sacred scriptures believed that the earth was “spread out” like a map on a flat circular table, [verse 6] and that our table-top world was covered by a giant dome made of solid crystal. This is what verse 5 refers to when it says that God “built” the sky. Within that dome are the sun, moon, and stars, and the moon is said to follow the sun, which we know it doesn’t really do. We’ve already seen in an earlier discussion that Muhammad thought that the sun dipped into a lake somewhere on the edge of the world only to reappear in another body of water on the other side again come morning.

I will have to ask the panel about the people of Thamuda, and why God needed a camel. I’m guessing that anything the prophet needs, he declares to be God’s property. That’s how some Christian evangelicals evade their taxes.

Sūrah 85 “Al-Burūj” (The Towering Constellations)

(1) By the sky with its towering constellations, (2) by the promised Day, (3) by the Witness and that which is witnessed, (4) damned were the makers of the trench, (5) the makers of the fuel-stoked fire! (6) They sat down (7) to watch what they were doing to the believers. (8) Their only grievance against them was their faith in God, the Mighty, the Praiseworthy, (9) to whom all control over the heavens and earth belongs: God is witness over all things. (10) For those who persecute believing men and women, and do not repent afterwards, there will be the torment of Hell and burning. (11) But for those who believe and do good deeds there will be Gardens graced with flowing streams: that is the great triumph. (12) [Prophet], your Lord’s punishment is truly stern––(13) it is He who brings people to life, and will restore them to life again––(14) and He is the Most Forgiving, the Most Loving. (15) The Glorious Lord of the Throne, (16) He does whatever He will. (17) Have you [not] heard the stories of the forces (18) of Pharaoh and Thamud? (19) Yet still the disbelievers persist in denial. (20) God surrounds them all. (21) This is truly a glorious Qur’an (22) [written] on a preserved Tablet.

Al-Quran.info calls this sūrah “the houses”. Quranx.com calls it “the stars”. And Quran.com calls it “The Mansions of the Stars”. I assume there is some connection to astrology.

Abdel Haleem’s description of this sura is that while no one is sure who the “trench-makers” were supposed to be, one option is that they might have been working for a Jewish ruler of sixth-century Yemen, who tortured Christians in that trench, but it could also refer to Nimrod’s treatment of Abraham (Razi). Regardless, that should be irrelevant now and when this was written.

What I think we’re seeing here is the believers’ love of being persecuted. It’s not enough to make-believe things that are not evidently true or even possible. It’s not enough to willfully believe against all reason. Ambitious pretenders go all out, convincing themselves in the face of social adversity too. Because faith is all about refusing to be reasoned with, and that is best satisfied by those who can claim to be oppressed because of their faith. Instead of seeing opposition as an indication that they got something wrong, believers somehow see it as vindication of their belief. Sometimes, they’re not really being persecuted at all, but they still feel like it, and claim that as a badge of honor among professional victims who are holier than thou.

Sūrah 95 “At-tin” (The Fig)

(1) By the fig, by the olive, (2) by Mount Sinai, (3) by this safe town, [Mecca] (4) We create man in the finest state (5) then reduce him to the lowest of the low, (6) except those who believe and do good deeds––(7) they will have an unfailing reward. After this, what makes you [man] deny the Judgement? (8) Is God not the most decisive of judges?

Even if I believed in God, even if I really wanted to believe, I’d still have a problem with this whole notion of judgement. It’s not just that we are judged, which is already a problem; because it should be that we’re being taught. So we should be able to improve and better ourselves. The problem is that even though it keeps saying “believe and do good deeds”, we know that the good deeds don’t count for anything. Just believe what we tell you or else. And then the “or else” is so over-the-top extreme that it is obviously just a ploy to scare anyone out of independent thought.

Sūrah 106 “Quraysh”

(1) [He did this] to make the Quraysh feel secure, (2) secure in their winter and summer journeys. (3) So let them worship the Lord of this House: (4) who provides them with food to ward off hunger, safety to ward off fear.

I don’t know what a quraysh is. None of my references explain that. So I’m really looking forward to my panel discussion. The one thought that comes to my mind about these last few sūrahs is that, if there really was a god, and he really was inspiring any of these scriptures, then he is an awful author. Surely the incompetent noob who wrote this unintelligible nonsense cannot be the same guy who invented DNA.

"The thing with needing a gun and German shepherds is only reasonable if you feel ..."

Debate: Is Christianity dangerous?
"I'm not a millennial nor a catholic.Is that helpful information for you to ascertain my ..."

Is an Agnostic also Atheist?
"I am a millennial Catholic and I agree. There is only belief or unbelief; nothing ..."

Is an Agnostic also Atheist?
"The New Testament demands that we love our neighbors. It also demands that we love ..."

Debate: Is Christianity dangerous?

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment