Today in my class on the Bible, we started the subject of “the Prophets.” Although we had already covered the “former prophets” aka the Deuteronomistic History, this was our first direct look at the phenomenon of prophecy. Since the student who presented addressed the subject of “false prophets” I shared with the class the story in 1 Kings 22.


There are lots of interesting and intriguing elements in this story. One that is particularly striking is that the story seems to completely undermine the standard presented in Deuteronomy that a true prophet can be identified in terms of what he or she predicts coming true. I’m used to finding divergent views in the Bible, but it is interesting that the Deuteronomistic History itself includes a story that seems to undercut Deuteronomy’s own criteria at this point.
It is just such an unusual and puzzling story. Any thoughts about it?