Picking and Choosing in the News

Picking and Choosing in the News April 15, 2010

Rick Phillips has commented on the resignation of Bruce Waltke over his views on evolution and creation. His view is that acceptance of science over the Bible on even one point undermines the whole thing.

I assume that either he believes that there is a dome over the earth, or rejects the Bible altogether, because apparently he believes those are the only two consistent positions – believe it all, or reject it all. But of course, I’m sure he has found some convoluted way of both reconciling science and the Bible on some major points, and persuading himself that his opposition to evolutionary biology and his literalistic approach to Adam and Eve are not selective, not “picking and choosing.”

Adam Walker Cleaveland shared a tweet he came across advising Jennifer Knapp, a contemporary Christian singer who very recently came out as a lesbian, to read Leviticus 18:22. I am sure the person who tweeted this doesn’t observe everything that is in Leviticus, much less everything in the Bible. Even within Leviticus 18, there is a command not to have sexual intercourse with one’s wife if she is menstruating. I wonder if anyone has done research on whether the “true Christians” mentioned in the tweet are strict observers of this commandment. But as we’ve discussed here recently, just over the page in chapter 19 of Leviticus there is plenty that Christians think is valuable, interspersed with much that is ignored.
Picking and choosing doesn’t bother me per se. If someone finds some things valuable, others not so much, and is honest about their selectivity, what is there to complain about? What bothers me is when people pick and choose, pretend they don’t, and then quote those verses that support their viewpoint, as though they would be quite happy if someone quoted any verse at them that they do not observe in the same way, and that they would quickly change their behavior as a result.

So I call upon Rick Phillips to publicly affirm the existence of the dome, and Ivette Maymi (the author of the tweet) to throw out all her cotton-wool blends. Or alternatively, you could both just acknowledge the complexities and selectivity involved in reading and applying the Bible today. And it would be great if you could also stop insulting and demeaning those who, in what seems to me to be their greater honesty and knowledge of the Bible than yours, acknowledge that the Bible tells us to do many things that we are persuaded we don’t need to do or even should not do, and as a result refuse to use the Bible as a source for sound bites.

I’m including below a cartoon I shared before which I think addresses this subject poignantly.


Browse Our Archives