Two opposing views on the intersection of historical study, naturalism, skepticism, miracles and related issues, expressed in the blogosphere today:
Ken Pulliam’s post focuses primarily on a recent chapter by Richard Carrier asking whether the resurrection traditions are more trustworthy than other ancient accounts of the miraculous which we dismiss.
Michael Barber’s post offers a different perspective, arguing that fairness requires that we leave room for the inexplicable.
Of course, such debates about the question in the abstract are rendered unnecessary when we can simply watch the miraculous happening on YouTube:
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In