I had the privilege of being present for Mark Goodacreโs paper proposing a conjectural emendation of the Gospel of Peter, so that it does not feature a walking, talking cross, but instead referred to Jesus as โthe crucified.โ
Remnant of Giants has blogged about Markโs proposal twice recently, and Mark himself has also done so.
I think Markโs proposal has a lot to be said for it. It fits well with the image of two angels leading/supporting Jesus as he exits the tomb, with his head higher than theirs, rather than being overshadowed and upstaged โ metaphorically if not literally โ by a cross whose presence in the tomb is more perplexing than that of the angels, and rather than his being essentially carried by the angels.
I canโt help wondering, though, whether the image of Jesus having returned to life, but needing some assistance initially, doesnโt seem natural to Mark and I because of a common source we both depend on โ by which I donโt mean Qโฆ












