Why Don’t We Have Both?

Why Don’t We Have Both? February 4, 2014

Out of the mouths of babes. And a little child shall lead them.

If the meme is unfamiliar to you, watch this commercial.

HT Catholic Memes on Facebook

"Well, those are quite a lot of questions about something I wasn't really planning on ..."

More on the (Puppy?) Dogs
"I'm not religious. Answering theodicy is quite difficult. It is one of the issues that ..."

God as Parent
"It's interesting that I'm starting my Early Modern Philosophy course this semester with the debate ..."

God as Parent
"As I’ve said before, we have no choice other than to draw on our experience ..."

God as Parent

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • ‘Cause they contradict each other; that’s why.

    • Shakespeare’s plays frequently contradict science as well, but I’ll gladly take them together.

      • Me too, but not as something inerrant.

        • James doesn’t subscribe to inerrancy; so, for him there’s room for both.

          Hamster, of course, is another story.

  • guest

    I’m fine with having both the Bible and science as long as people understand that the Bible is a collection of myths, legends, poetry and proverbs and science is a method for finding out the truth about the world, and if the Bible contradicts the evidence gathered by scientists, it’s the Bible that’s wrong.

    People taking Genesis literally is stupid. (They’re a great band but their lyrics aren’t factually based).

    • $26634104

      Actually, archeology and contemporary historical accounts back up many things in the Bible…