Geology is the Least of the Flood’s Problems

Geology is the Least of the Flood’s Problems

Someone commented on a post I shared on Facebook, โ€œThe Bible gives clear evidence of the dates [of the flood] in Genesis 5 and 11.โ€

Murray Hogg offered the following reply, which I thought was worth sharing as a post on my blog, and so I am doing so with his permission:

Yep.

It sets the date of Noahโ€™s flood to about 2300 BC <http://creation.com/the-date-of-noahs-flood>.

Problem is, this is a period of history about which we know a fair deal, and there is zero reason to think that there was, at this time, a global flood which destroyed humanity.

I mean, seriously, weโ€™re talking about an event smack bang in the middle of the period during which Old Kingdom Egypt existed and for which we have a continuous list of the Egyptian rulers (just to cite one example).

Thatโ€™s โ€œcontinuousโ€ as in โ€œunbroken by a major civilization ending catastrophe.โ€

I donโ€™t mean to marginalize the contribution of geologists, etc. to this debate, but seriously: one doesnโ€™t even have to look at geology to know that there was NOT a global flood in 2300BC or thereabouts leaving only about half a dozen people alive.

Weโ€™re not talking โ€œpre-historyโ€ here โ€“there are solid historical records which show cultural continuity throughout the world right when the Bible claims every human culture was destroyed.

Still, I suppose itโ€™s much easier to construct a satisfying theory if you ascribe to a doctrine of willful ignorance.


Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the name "Samuel" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.