Although I don’t think this accurately describes the situation, for the sake of argument, let’s assume for the moment that the evidence for the existence of Jesus, or the criteria for evaluating the evidence, is such that the question of Jesus’ existence cannot be answered one way or the other. The evidence is precisely balanced: he could well have existed, he may well have been invented. The question simply cannot be settled – his existence is possible and plausible, but neither probable... Read more