This post is part of a series on how pro-life and pro-choice people can find common ground to work for holistic reproductive justice. The introduction to this series can be found at this link.
In light of the recent arrest of Purvi Patel, a woman who is currently facing 20 years in prison because she had a miscarriage, I need to start this post by being VERY CLEAR that this series is not an excuse for violent pro-life ideologies.
Many pro-life people claim that they are not forcing people into pregnancy. Yet Patel’s story says otherwise. Whether you are using coercion to accuse people of murder when they refuse or are unable to donate their bodies to a fetus for nine months, or whether you actually support criminalizing these people, you are participating in violence.
However, I write this series because I agree with Andrea Smith when she says that we can “think more creatively about whom we could work in coalition with…” (Conquest, pg. 103) If you identify as pro-life, but are willing to let go of positions that would force anyone to become or remain pregnant, I think we can work together.
I write this series to talk about what that “common ground” might look like in practice.
Today, let’s look at one way:
1. Look At The Reasons Why People Seek Abortions
The reasons why people seek abortions are complicated and interrelated, and there is no one simple “alternative” to abortion. Pro-life people who are truly committed to non-violence must remember this. Slogans like, “Adoption, Not Abortion!” erase the nuanced situations that lead people to abortion.
At the same time, however, pro-choice feminist solutions also sometimes oversimplify people’s lives. As historian Rickie Solinger states (as quoted in Conquest, pg. 99):
Middle-class women could afford to choose. They had earned the right to choose motherhood, if they liked. According to many Americans, however, when choice was associated with poor women, it became a symbol of illegitimacy. Poor women had not earned the right to choose.
The focus on choice, as Andrea Smith says, “is connected to possession of resources.” (pg. 99) Put another way, if a poor person wants to have children, but “chooses” abortion because they cannot afford childcare, is that truly a “choice?” The corporate feminisms–and the pro-choice groups that they support–that center upper-class celebrities, women CEOs, and Lean In ideologies don’t do much to provide justice for all pregnant people, only those privileged enough to have access to actual “choice.”
So, why do people get abortions? Whether you are comfortable with the concept of abortion or not, it’s important to look at those reasons if we want justice for pregnant people.
Remember, that these reasons are complicated and often overlap. Let’s resist the urge to over-simplify as we go through them.
Reason #1: People weren’t ready to become pregnant, or do not want any (or anymore) children
Sometimes the mainstream “pro-choice” movements do a good job of addressing the reasons for abortion. I think this is one such area. Most pro-choice movements that I have been involved in want access not only to safe and legal abortion, but also effective birth control and comprehensive sex education.
Though I don’t think there’s anything wrong with abortion, for most people it’s usually easier to avoid an unwanted pregnancy in the first place than to deal with the stress involved in finding out that you’re pregnant when you don’t want to be.
Pro-life people can help prevent abortions by preventing unwanted pregnancy. You can teach your children safer sex practices, and create a family environment where your teenagers who would like to have sex that could lead to pregnancy are not afraid to ask their about birth control options.
You can support comprehensive sex education programs that teach kids age-appropriate material that helps them make safer choices when it comes to sex. Even if you support abstinence, realize that not everyone does, and that it’s important for teenagers to have access to accurate information on pregnancy and prevention.
It’s also important to support access to insurance policies that cover effective birth control. If you were rooting for Hobby Lobby to be allowed to deny coverage for Plan B and other emergency contraceptives, I hate to break it to you, but you’re not going to be preventing many abortions. If you are part of a Christian college that stops student organizations from handing out condoms, you are limiting people’s options.
(Note: the pro-choice movement’s focus on birth control does have some problematic elements. I will be addressing these in a later post)
Reason #2: People who might otherwise want children cannot afford them
To reference Conquest once again, Andrea Smith brings up the point that many pro-choice “heroes” have failed to address “the conditions that put [people] in the position of having to make the decision in the first place.” (pg. 99)
Smith specifically calls out Bill Clinton, who was considered pro-choice, and yet called for welfare reforms that had extremely detrimental effects on people in poverty situations. Often, pro-choice people herald abortion as a solution to poverty. They’ve got it backward.
No one who wants to become pregnant and have children should have to give up that dream just because they can’t afford to feed the kids they have now.
Childcare is also extremely expensive and inaccessible for many. Many people cannot afford to quit their jobs to care for their children, and many lower paying jobs do not provide paid parental leave. For these people, the idea of choice is basically an illusion.
Even people who could afford to quit their jobs for a short time to care for their children may not want to take the risk of losing out on a financially important career or education.
In a world where it is becoming harder and harder even for middle class people to make a living, people may not want to take that risk. What happens when they have to retire and weren’t able to save any money for it? Or when an illness prevents their spouse from working, and they are unable to get their own job because of the gaps in their resume when they stayed home to care for the kids for several years?
And giving birth, not to mention raising a child, is expensive. This is especially true when it comes to children or parents who have disabilities or illnesses that require extra care. Many people, especially those without jobs or those in low-paying jobs, don’t even have health insurance to help cover these costs.
Does your church or Christian college provide parental leave and health insurance for it’s employees? Does your seminary offer affordable childcare programs for students? Are you voting for politicians who support guaranteed livable income for all and a better social safety net? Are you standing in solidarity with low-wage workers who are fighting for a higher minimum wage and benefits?
Economic justice is an area that many pro-choice movements fail to address. Pro-life people who want to be non-violent can help pick up the slack in this area.
Reason #3: People may not want to have children because of an unhealthy or unstable family situation
In the world we live in, it’s hard to be a single parent. Society offers little support in this area, and stigmatizes those who try to raise a child without the help of a partner. Abortion may be an option for single people who find themselves pregnant, but it should not be the only option.
Many pregnant people may find themselves in abusive relationships that they are afraid to leave because of this. It is much harder to leave an abusive relationship when children are involved–in fact, many abusers know this and will try to get their victims pregnant as a means of control. Other people may end up pregnant as the result of rape. These people may not to give birth or raise a child in such an unhealthy situation.
Even in otherwise healthy situations, families may be broken apart because of overlapping oppressions. In our white supremacist society, black men are targeted by the prison industrial complex, and therefore many are unable to be there for their children. Many people of color find themselves as single parents because their partners are in prison, unjustly.
Even black women are unjustly targeted by racist prison systems (see Marissa Alexander). Who wants to give birth knowing that they might be facing 60 years in prison for defending themselves from domestic violence?
Does your church perpetuate stereotypes of single parents, or do they affirm single parents and provide them with the resources they need to care for their children? What steps have you taken to speak out against abuse and rape in your communities? Are you standing in solidarity with those challenging unjust systems that tear otherwise healthy families apart?
I will discuss this more in a later post.
Reason #4: People may not want to give birth because of medical or health issues
I will try to keep this brief, since this post is already nearly two thousand words.
Many people do not wish to give birth because doing so may be a serious health risk for them. Others may learn that the fetus they are carrying as serious health problems, and may be reluctant to give birth as a result.
Do you support universal health care for all people? Are you contributing to research that searches for solutions to serious medical problems that may put pregnant people or their potential children at risk? How will your pro-life communities support the parents of children who are born with health problems or disabilities? Do you have empathy for those who choose abortion because of health risks, or do you continue to shame people into risking their lives by giving birth? Does your community stigmatize or affirm the humanity of people with disabilities and/or mental health disorders?
There is no way to completely prevent the need for elective abortion. Safe and legal access will always be necessary. But if you lean toward a pro-life position on abortion, there are ways to reduce the need for it, while simultaneously reducing the violence that people with the potential to get pregnant have to face on a daily basis.