Index: Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence

Index: Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence August 11, 2012

Part 1: The Bayesian Interpretation of ECREE“: a Bayesian interpretation and defense of ECREE
Part 2: Is ECREE False? A Reply to William Lane Craig“: Craig’s objection to ECREE is based upon an misinterpretation of ECREE.

Part 3: Is ECREE False? A Reply to Kurt Jaros“: ECREE emphasizes the common sense notion that the more implausible (i.e., antecedently improbable) we initially regard a claim prior to considering the evidence, the greater the evidence we will require to believe the claim.
Part 4: NT Reliability, Extraordinary Claims, and the Base Rate Fallacy“: arguments for miracles based solely on the general historical reliability of the New Testament commit the base rate fallacy.
Part 5: Is ECREE False? A Reply to Greg Koukl and Melinda Penner“: the Bayesian interpretation of ECREE shows why Koukl’s objections to ECREE are misguided
Part 6: Is ECREE False? A Reply to Greg Koukl and Melinda Penner (continued)
Part 7: Christian Apologist Glenn Miller Agrees!” 

"Given that, among the billions in the Christian hordes, relatively few are involved in “classical ..."

The Logic of Miracles
"In this case, the people Bradley is talking about are involved in "Classical apologetics". The ..."

The Logic of Miracles
"Well, as I indicated above, the people in the bible seemed to be pretty clear ..."

The Logic of Miracles
"I see.Back to the original point on miracles:To know an event is a miracle, people ..."

The Logic of Miracles

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment