Ian’s Review of Carrier’s Proving History and Carrier’s Reply

Ian’s Review of Carrier’s Proving History and Carrier’s Reply October 13, 2012

An atheist named Ian with a deep background in math and science has written a critical review of Carrier’s Proving History.

A Mathematical Review of “Proving History” by Richard Carrier

Among other things, Ian complains that Carrier uses a version of Bayes’s Theorem (BT) that is “unduly complex” and “highly idiosyncratic.” I disagree. I think one’s assumptions can play a huge role in historical Jesus studies, so it valuable to use a version of BT which explicitly includes background knowledge (B).

Other critical posts on Ian’s site:

 Carrier’s reply may be found here.

"The assertion does NOT explicitly mention a methodology, nor does it clearly describe a methodology.So, ..."

Some Reflections on Epistemology
"What is logic? Logic is the poorly developed ability of a single half insane, semi-suicidal ..."

Some Reflections on Epistemology
"Are you suggesting that human reason is of no relevance to the question of gods? ..."

Some Reflections on Epistemology
"Such reasoning is ILLOGICAL.And whether that matters and is relevant depends entirely on whether logic ..."

Some Reflections on Epistemology

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment