Bobier’s New Paper on the Kalam Argument: “God, Time, and the Kalam Cosmological Argument”

Bobier’s New Paper on the Kalam Argument: “God, Time, and the Kalam Cosmological Argument” August 5, 2013
Christopher Alan Bobier, “God, Time, and the Kalam Cosmological Argument”Sophia (May 2013).
Here’s the abstract:

The Kalām cosmological argument deploys the following causal principle: whatever begins to exist has a cause. Yet, under what conditions does something ‘begin to exist’? What does it mean to say that ‘X begins to exist at t’? William Lane Craig has offered and defended various accounts that seek to establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for when something ‘begins to exist.’ I argue that all of the accounts that William Lane Craig has offered fail on the following grounds: either they entail that God has a cause or they render the Kalām argument unsound. Part of the problem is due to Craig’s view of God’s relationship to time: that God exists timelessly without creation and temporarily with creation. The conclusion is that Craig must abandon either the Kalām argument or his view of God’s relationship to time; he cannot consistently hold both.

HT: Ex-apologist

"Well,sexual activity is self-explanatoryactivity that is not open to the creation of new life in ..."

Aquinas and Homosexual Sex – Part ..."
"Anyway, I have a largely free week and am kind of up for this. If ..."

Aquinas and Homosexual Sex – Part ..."
"I'm asking for a definition of "immoral" that does NOT presuppose any specific theory of ..."

Aquinas and Homosexual Sex – Part ..."
"I don't always notice posts coming through, or I notice but I forget due to ..."

Aquinas and Homosexual Sex – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives